Print 41 comment(s) - last by voronwe.. on Sep 2 at 11:58 PM

Mission is planned for December, if successful will deliver on 2006 promise four years early

While Mars remains the next major milestone in man's exploration of the final frontier, there's a brewing space race over Earth's largest satellite, the Moon.  The Moon was last visited by mankind in 1972 and only one country -- the United States -- has ever succeeded in a manned Moon mission.  But that could soon change.

I. Rover Program is Ahead of 

In an announcement to state media Wednesday; Chinese officials revealed they hoped to land a lunar probe on the Moon by the end of the year.  Named after a mythical Chinese goddess who legend had it lived on a palace on the Moon, Chang,e-3 will be China's third lunar effort.  It marks the Asian nation's first major effort to make a soft landing -- a crucial precursor to manned exploration and colonization.

A Lunar rover would be another huge milestone for China's space program.  Today, the "Lunar club" of those who sent a probe to the moon (a crash lander or orbiter) is relatively large and includes China, the U.S., the European Union, Japan, India, and Russia.  But a soft landing is a far tougher target.  Only two countries -- the U.S. and Russia -- at the height of their Cold War era prowess managed to land a Lunar rover.  Russia required 21 launches, including 11 failed lander launches, before it accomplished a soft landing with Luna 9.  

Lunokhod 1
Only two countries -- Russia and the U.S. have accomplished soft Lunar landings (Lunokhod 1 rover pictured). [Image Source: Unknown]

China is trying to achieve a soft landing in only 3 launches; and its efforts may be as much as three years ahead of schedule.  So how did it get here?

After early efforts in the 1960s that were ultimately mothballed, China returned to the arena of space exploration in the 90s under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping, the leader who came to define the future face of modern China.  While Mr. Deng will be remembered most for the way he reintroduced capitalism to China and blended it with the country's communist traditions, his space drive holds a special legacy of its own.

Chinese space explorers
Chinese space explorers are known as "Taikonauts". [Image Source: AFP]

Introduced near the end of his 14-year administration, the mission continued unheralded by the Western world after Mr. Deng's 1992 retirement and death in 1997.  Two years later, China tested a space capsule designed dubbed Shenzhou 1 (shenzhou is roughly translated to "divine craft") -- launched aboard a Long March 2F heavy space rocket.  Then in 2003 PLA Major General Yang Liwei became the first Taikonaut as China launched him in a 21-hour orbit in a capsule launched with a Shenzhou 5 rocket.

II. Doubters Abounded

In 2006, China boldly proclaimed that it would send a lunar rover to the Moon's surface by 2017 and send Taikonauts (Chinese astronauts) to the Moon by 2024.  Oft underestimated by the West, many scoffed at what seemed a fantastic claim at the time; others still made derisive comments dismissing the goal as "60 years late”.

After its first manned mission in 2003, China announced in 2006 that it would put men on the moon in two decades. [Image Source: NPR]

But a few, like DailyTech blogger Michael Asher, took China seriously.  Michael wrote:

Honestly, I'm surprised China didn't set a sooner target, given the amount of resources they're pumping into missile and astronautical development. A moon shoot is tremendous national prestige....and, if they decide to leave a base there, a very valuable military, political, and economic asset. 

The Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) -- which in 1990 had crashed landed a crude probe on the Moon -- also kicked off 2006 with bold Moon mission claims of its own, saying it would send men on the Moon by 2030.  China's critics crowed and chuckled when JAXA pulled the plug on its troubled Moon bid a year later.  Japan has since revisited the plans, and managed to send a successful multi-probe mission named SELENE to the Moon in 2007.

III.  China Sees Two Successful Moon Shots

Not long before China's claim the U.S. announced it would be returning to the Moon with the Orion mission, a proclamation that was much cheered.  But not so long after the U.S. perhaps saw the writing on the wall as well, admitting in 2007 that the Chinese would likely reach the Moon before NASA's return (The U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration).  Many were startled by that assessment.

That same year marked China's first major Lunar milestone, successfully launched an orbiter -- Chang'e 1 -- which mapped out the soil on the Lunar surface.

Chang'e 1
Chang'e 1 orbited the Moon for over a year before being directed into a controlled crash.
[Image Source: China Daily]

The success stoked other countries to kick of bold Moon shots of their own.  In 2007 Russia -- the only other nation besides the U.S. to accomplish a soft-landing on the moon -- announced plans of its own to finally send a manned mission to the Moon.  The goal of that mission is a 2025 manned landing.  That objective may prove impossible, as the Russian space program has suffered budget cuts similar to those endured by NASA.

Also that year South Korea announced plans to launch a Lunar probe by 2020.  Even Iran claimed it was headed to the Moon.

China isn't the only young tech power to see proven success.  In 2008 India sent a Lunar probe that intentionally crash landed into the Lunar surface.  China in Mar. 2009 accomplished its own successful Lunar impact.  While China may leap ahead if its Lunar rover mission succeeds later this year, India plans to catch up with a rover of its own in 2016.  India is aiming to land men on the moon by 2020, however that target may be overambitious as the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), India's space agency, has yet achieve manned spaceflight, which China has been successfully doing for a decade now.

IV. A New Space Superpower

Today China's space program is thriving.  Since the 2003 first launch China has sent seven other taikonauts, including two women, into space aboard four Shenzhou missions, the most recent of which was launched in June.  Shenzhou 6 (2005), the second manned mission introduced multiple crewmembers and an extended multi-day orbit.  Shenzhou 7 (2008) marked the first Chinese spacewalk.  Shenzhou 9 launched last year and successfully docked with China's first space station -- Tiangong-1 -- which it launched in 2011.

In short, what little doubt their might have been about China's ability to conquer any space objective that mankind has thus far achieved is today all but erased.  Today when China says it will land a rover by the year's end most believe it.

China Shenzhou
China's Long March rockets have achieved increasing success rates, as manned missions have become a yearly occurence. [Image Source: AFP]

The moment of truth -- the launch and landing -- still lie ahead and undetermined.  If China is successful, it will be four years ahead of its ambitious space program goals and one step closer to establishing a Moon colony.  Those plans are boosted by recent discoveries affirming that there is indeed water on the moon, which could be used not only for drinking, but as a source for other crucial chemicals like hydrogen peroxide and rocket fuel (e.g. H2/O2 pure diatomic gases).  Recent surveys also hinted at rich deposits of mercury, gold, and silver igniting fresh interest in Lunar mining.

The race to "conquer" the Moon and its resources is officially on.  Despite falling behind China, the U.S. is still dreaming big and wants a moon base of its own in the coming decades.  And it recently enlisted a bit of help.  Intriguingly this help -- and much of China's Lunar competition -- comes not from a slew of space capable world powers -- India, Russia, Japan, Iran, the European Union, and the U.S. government -- but from private sector dreamers.

V. Private Sector May Rise to Compete With China

While NASA is still testing some potential tools for use in a Moon mission -- such as the "Mighty Eagle" autonomous lander/hovering testbed -- NASA is increasingly leaning on the private space industry to deliver on its own ambitions of Lunar dominance.  NASA has contracted Bigelow Aerospace to develop a potential Moon base design.  

NASA's budget
NASA's budget has been on a downward tilt. [Image Source: NASA]

Meanwhile SpaceX -- the private aerospace startup founded by Tesla Motors Inc. (TSLACEO Elon Musk -- is carrying out tests winding up to a mid-2015 manned launch of its DragonRider capsule, which is capable of carrying up to 7 astronauts into space.  SpaceX -- which already upset doubters by establishing itself as a major commercial satellite and cargo rocket provider -- has promised a "per seat" cost of $20M USD, versus the current $63M USD per astronaut fee the U.S. is paying Russia for use of the aging Soyuz capsules.  SpaceX is expected to unveil the second-generation Dragon capsule later this year, a design capable of soft landings on the Moon or Mars.

Among the other promising projects are the OpenLuna project, which aims to use open source philosophy to design and launch lunar probes, landers, manned spaceships, and even a Moon colony.  That project's first launch test will be a nano-satellite launch in 2014.

Also on the radar is the Shackleton Energy Comp., a Texas startup that hopes to send a Lunar rover to the moon by 2016 and a manned mission by the next decade.  CEO Bill Stone, a famous cave explorer, tried in 2011 to raise $1.2M USD in seed funding via RocketHub, but only raised $5,517 USD in crowdsourced funding.  That's alarming given that Mr. Stone previously stated his company needed $25B USD to achieve manned missions and profitability.  Of course he might have better luck getting funding from bigger crowdsourcing sites like IndieGogo or Kickstarter.

Space X Moon Base
Elon Musk's SpaceX is among the private firms targeting a Moon mission.
[Image Source: Project Sword]

Another entrant is The Golden Spike Comp., whose staff of former politicians and NASA scientists lends it some name credibility.  The company aims to mine the Moon and is budgeting $7B to $8B USD to achieve initial launch capability, followed by $1.5B USD for a two-person Moon mission.  The company has been contracting Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC) to co-design and evaluate a potential Lunar lander design.

Then there's the $20M USD Lunar X-Prize, sponsored by Google Inc. (GOOG).  So far 26 teams are currently vying for that money (8 have dropped out).  The contest launched in 2007.  So far the most promising entrants have been Asociatia Romana pentru Cosmonautica si Aeronautica (ARCA) -- which completed a pair of successful test launches, including an atmospheric manned flight -- and Moon Express (MoonEx) a startup backed by Silicon Valley entrepreneurs who tested the Lunar Test Vehicle (LTV).  And then there's Astrobotic, another startup, who has paired with SpaceX to launch a probe to drill on the Lunar probes in Oct. 2015.  A semi-completed lander  was unveiled in Oct. 2012.

Source: AFP on Google

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

China is exciting me
By wordsworm on 8/29/2013 10:10:52 PM , Rating: 2
China is getting into some pretty exciting stuff. Whatever the US did back in the stone ages was pretty impressive, I'm sure. But all of that was before I was born and old news by the time I was old enough to realize its importance. Now China is investing in space travel, and I can't help but think they will find a way to commercialize and profit from it.

I have imagined that the moon will become man's first extra terrestrial nation. How long, I wonder, will it take for the first lunar colony to declare itself independent from the country that sends it.

In any case, it sure is uplifting to see that progress is being made after so many years of silence.

RE: China is exciting me
By Samus on 8/30/13, Rating: 0
RE: China is exciting me
By Sandoz88 on 8/30/2013 1:12:09 AM , Rating: 2
Right on Samus!

RE: China is exciting me
By CyberHawk on 8/30/2013 1:20:56 AM , Rating: 3
We settled it in 1969 so we should have the right to keep them off it.

And what gives you that "right"? I read somewhere, that you should proclaim moon soil as American propriety. I don't use this, but .... LOL :-D

RE: China is exciting me
By retrospooty on 8/30/2013 9:07:49 AM , Rating: 2
"And what gives you that "right"? I read somewhere, that you should proclaim moon soil as American propriety"

LOL... I know, its not the last cookie that we can lick like a child to claim it. It's not like we are using it. There is plenty of nothing up on the moon for everyone to not use.

RE: China is exciting me
By Reclaimer77 on 8/30/2013 11:23:25 AM , Rating: 1
We landed there first and planted the flag. By all rights the moon is ours.

By your logic by what "rights" does any country claim its borders? The world belongs to everyone right?

RE: China is exciting me
By retrospooty on 8/30/2013 11:34:40 AM , Rating: 3
"We landed there first and planted the flag. By all rights the moon is ours."

So does that mean the USA belongs to the Natives, The Norse, or Spain?

RE: China is exciting me
By Reclaimer77 on 8/30/2013 12:19:36 PM , Rating: 1
Lol retro you can do better than that buddy :)

I didn't say the Moon was in fact ours. However by all rights of exploration and discovery, it could be.

RE: China is exciting me
By retrospooty on 8/30/2013 12:39:30 PM , Rating: 2
"Lol retro you can do better than that buddy :)"

hehe... I had to take care of a few things, so I couldn't elaborate, but I thought that was pretty good for a quickie.

But I think you see my point. Historically, newly discovered land doesn't automatically belong to the first country to stick a flag in the ground... It belongs to whoever colonizes it and lives on it and/or fights for it and wins. Case in point, USA... The British set up colonies and lived here and it was theirs until we fought them for self control. Same with Spain and many countries in LAT.

My other point was that there isn't anything worthwhile there. Geologically speaking, its the same as the Earth minus atmosphere. There are no minerals or other resources there that we cant get here a million times cheaper. When we went there in 1969 it was an amazing accomplishment, but to do anything worthwhile there, like colonize, mine or whatever... There arent any benefits based on our current tech. It would cost way more than whatever we gain.

RE: China is exciting me
By Reclaimer77 on 8/30/13, Rating: 0
RE: China is exciting me
By retrospooty on 8/30/2013 4:27:43 PM , Rating: 2
I didnt say I want to spread communism, just that I am pretty sure us going there and planting a flag doesn't mean we own it. Typically, the "owner" of a new land is the one that colonizes it... However, with today's technology, colonizing it doesn't make fiscal sense - a huge expendature for very little return. It's a very fiscal conservative view I have there, not communist. You of all people should recognize that and commend me for it. ;)

RE: China is exciting me
By Reclaimer77 on 8/30/2013 4:58:43 PM , Rating: 2
RE: China is exciting me
By retrospooty on 8/30/2013 5:04:58 PM , Rating: 2
LOL - Time for another round of manifest destiny ?

RE: China is exciting me
By WinstonSmith on 9/1/2013 10:45:08 AM , Rating: 2
"We landed there first and planted the flag. By all rights the moon is ours."

There's an international treaty that says no one can claim the moon. Same for Antarctica.

RE: China is exciting me
By JediJeb on 9/1/2013 9:24:49 PM , Rating: 2
What if a private group lands on the moon with no national backing and sets up a colony and declares it sovereign? If the group were not signers of the treaty, then they would not be bound by that treaty.

RE: China is exciting me
By ClownPuncher on 8/30/2013 1:41:25 PM , Rating: 2
Like Britain always did. Put a flag in it and it's yours.

RE: China is exciting me
By retrospooty on 8/30/2013 2:14:25 PM , Rating: 2
Pretty sure that was females... Not land ;)

RE: China is exciting me
By pandemonium on 8/30/2013 2:03:38 AM , Rating: 2
And? Show me where this "we" didn't do the same?

Please see the following light reading. (Okay, I'll make it easy on you. See Table 1.3.2 Source vs. Type Accounting on Page 6.)

Long story short, "they're" adolescent in their space exploration, but "we" did the exact same thing by smashing satellites into other worldly bodies and still are.

Please don't be a hypocrit.

RE: China is exciting me
By Samus on 8/30/13, Rating: 0
RE: China is exciting me
By pandemonium on 8/30/2013 5:52:47 AM , Rating: 3
I provide a credible link and you don't read it; nicely done.

Intentionally smashing into an orbiting satellite and intentionally leaving capsules or debris isn't much different. It's still intentionally cluttering orbital space, and causing future issues; one happens to be more-so than the other. Both are still littering.

So, it's ok to leave junk, just don't smash it - even if it means data could be garnered in the act of.

Humanity is constantly regurgitating experiments that have already been done, in the pursuit of knowledge that was otherwise missed. You're saying once something's been done, it's been done to the fullest extent and there's no need to do it again, right? Is that how it works for you?

Things aren't as cut-and-dry as you believe them to be.

Worthless analogies? Alright, then. Let's play.

So, your guy already jumped off a mountain to see if he could fly and he fell to his death. But, my guy has this crazy idea for wings and he thinks it'll improve upon your guy's failure. By your rationalization, he will also die in exactly the same manner. The experiment was done. Stop jumping off mountains! Nothing good will come of it!!

Are you still driving a Model T? That car's been made several hundred times over again. Just buy the same exact thing when it wears out. There's no reason to improve upon it. It's been done.

Hysterical. Simply hysterical.

Your pride is simply too stunning to even touch with rational thought.

RE: China is exciting me
By Samus on 8/31/2013 12:20:05 AM , Rating: 2
I read your link, and Russia has polluted space about 8:1 compared to the United States with dead satellites.

RE: China is exciting me
By Solandri on 8/30/2013 2:40:23 AM , Rating: 2
Difference is we didn't know any better when we first did it. We (and the Russians) know better now. We told China so they should know better too, but they went ahead and did it anyway.

There's a huge difference between doing something dumb because you didn't know it was bad, and doing something dumb even though you knew it was bad.
(Okay, I'll make it easy on you. See Table 1.3.2 Source vs. Type Accounting on Page 6.)

Just look at the ratios of payloads to total debris (in orbit or decayed) from your table.

US: 1863 payloads, 9317 debris, 5.0 debris per payload
CIS: 3184 payloads, 17328 debris, 5.4 per payload
France: 52 payloads, 1024 debris, 19.7 per payload
China: 111 payloads, 2885 debris, 26.0 per payload
India: 42 payloads, 413 debris, 9.8 per payload
Japan: 125 payloads, 356 debris, 2.8 per payload
ESA: 54 payloads, 104 debris, 2.0 per payload
Other: 436 payloads, 568 debris, 1.3 per payload

RE: China is exciting me
By pandemonium on 8/30/2013 6:08:07 AM , Rating: 2
Difference is we didn't know any better when we first did it. We (and the Russians) know better now. We told China so they should know better too, but they went ahead and did it anyway.

Oh, so you know all of this for a fact ? Please, direct me to this information. For I'd love to see that for myself.

Yup, the ratio is pretty skewed in the direction of, "holy crap, they're just making a mess of things!" And I'm absolutely certain that this means they'll continue to do it because everyone knows that the Chinese never learn anything until they've done it at least a thousand times.

Basing a pattern off a very small running sample of data is extremely future-proof; I tell you.

RE: China is exciting me
By Solandri on 8/30/2013 1:21:29 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, so you know all of this for a fact ? Please, direct me to this information. For I'd love to see that for myself.

Here you go:

So they knew space debris was a problem as early as 2001 and went so far as to establish their own debris tracking program by 2005. But in 2007 they went ahead and conducted an ASAT test which created the greatest amount of debris in the history of space exploration. The satellite was 537 miles up - high enough that some of that debris will remain in orbit for thousands of years.

On our end, the problem was suspected in the 1970s, and confirmed in the 1980s-1990s. NASA and the US Strategic Command both began locating and tracking larger pieces of debris in the 1990s.

Basing a pattern off a very small running sample of data is extremely future-proof; I tell you.

Hey, you provided the data as proof of your assertion. I just crunched the numbers in it to figure out if it was really saying what you claimed it was. If you're now claiming the data set is too small to be useful, why'd you post it in the first place?

RE: China is exciting me
By pandemonium on 8/31/2013 1:24:16 AM , Rating: 2
I'm pretty sure they knew since the 70's, when it became a widely known issue.

Those links don't prove that all of the data collected from the U.S. and Russia was provided to China for their own analysis.

I provided the data and never said anything about it being an infallible proposition for the conduct of future space missions. You inserted that yourself.

RE: China is exciting me
By wordsworm on 9/1/2013 3:11:13 AM , Rating: 2
What country are you from? I'm not sure who could keep them off the moon anyways.

In any case, I'm not sure why anyone would want to stop them from doing it. Who cares who does it. China, America, Russia... regardless, makes me proud of the human race.

No problem
By macca007 on 8/30/2013 6:11:58 AM , Rating: 2
I don't have a problem with any nation heading into space, As long as it is treated as international territory! It is for all humanity not certain nations only.
One giant leap for "mankind". The sooner humanity has another place to call home the better off our species will be, At the moment we are just waiting for some catastrophic event to wipe us out.

RE: No problem
By ShieTar on 8/30/2013 7:07:31 AM , Rating: 3
So what? Being wiped out won't bother anybody who was dead before it happened, and the ones getting killed won't be relieved about the fact that there are other worlds with the same, or after a few hundred generations a similar, species on them. How about we focus on learning how to sustainably and comfortably live on this planet first, and invest into humane living conditions for the billions of people in Africa, South-America and Asia, instead of dumping billions into another dozen people walking on the moon?

RE: No problem
By maugrimtr on 8/30/2013 10:31:19 AM , Rating: 2
While the sentiment is understandable, Space isn't that big of a budgetary concern. Have a look at US military spending. The biggest problem is NASA - successive presidents have left it a directionless ruin by using it as a political chip. Each one announces some crazy plan for manned space exploration - each time it gets under funded and is cancelled by the time the next president rolls in.

Ask yourself this, why is NASA spending dollars on prototyping a moon base when there's no current plan to actually send anyone there? It's patently ridiculous spending. Someone is redirecting funds from projects that matter (like planetary sciences) to propping up a private company which would be doing this research anyway on its own buck.

The only thing NASA ever makes sense about anymore is it's robotic missions. Even there, we should all know how important it is to get more robots/probes/landers into places like the Jovian moons which is a fascinating place with a moon that, probably, has a liquid water subsurface - possibly the only body in the solar system apart from Earth with such a strong possibility of life.

RE: No problem
By sorry dog on 9/2/2013 1:13:06 PM , Rating: 2
The only thing NASA ever makes sense about anymore is it's robotic missions. Even there, we should all know how important it is to get more robots/probes/landers into places like the Jovian moons which is a fascinating place with a moon that, probably, has a liquid water subsurface - possibly the only body in the solar system apart from Earth with such a strong possibility of life.

How come everybody seems to forget about the first A in NASA?
They do a lot of important work in that area of research. I actually think we should split them into two separate agencies... The NAA and the .... um NSA? well guess that one is taken but Space something agency....

RE: No problem
By voronwe on 9/2/2013 11:44:50 PM , Rating: 2
Ask yourself this, why is NASA spending dollars on prototyping a moon base when there's no current plan to actually send anyone there?

Simple answer: NASA isn't spending dollars on prototyping a moon base. Do you know what "prototyping" means?

Second, it's an unfunded Space Act Agreement to chart a path forward for commercial entities to work with NASA to explore space for commercial purposes, i.e. microgravity product development, mining, tourism, solar power, etc.

Third, this is the best space program the US has yet had, yes, including Apollo, even despite Congress using NASA as a pork barrel. There are at least ten manned space vehicles being designed in the US right now, with only one of them NASA-designed, seven of them with direct NASA support. The oft-maligned asteroid retrieval mission is already yielding serious plans for commercial asteroid mining, a first and very necessary post-tourism market to fund all those new vehicles. And the space technology program is quietly retiring risk on things like propellant depots and solar electric propulsion.

So although NASA may be in a transition period, give the agency some credit. They're driving some huge and very cool changes.

RE: No problem
By Reclaimer77 on 8/30/2013 12:26:46 PM , Rating: 2
That sentimental ignorant nonsense is what's set the space program back for a decade.

RE: No problem
By ShieTar on 8/31/2013 4:09:56 AM , Rating: 2
It isn't set back at all, the usefull programms in Science, Earth Observation and Navigation Services are progressing quiet well. Its the pointless pipe-dreams of colonising dead rocks that have been pushed down, and for good reason.

RE: No problem
By Reclaimer77 on 8/31/2013 8:44:12 AM , Rating: 2
A man hasn't left Earth's orbit since the late 1960's. If that's not being put on hold, I don't know what is.

If we had kept up the same pace, we would already have a manned mission to Mars under our belt. Maybe more.

And if you think THAT is worthless, or has anything to do with colonizing "dead rocks", don't waste my time with further discussion.

RE: No problem
By Reclaimer77 on 8/31/2013 8:45:57 AM , Rating: 2
EDIT: Early 1970's actually, but whatever.

RE: No problem
By voronwe on 9/2/2013 11:58:47 PM , Rating: 2
A decade?

Huh. Okay, I'll bite, Reclaimer77. Tell us what you know about the space program.

RE: No problem
By w8gaming on 9/1/2013 6:07:51 AM , Rating: 2
Bill Gates had dumped billions of his fortune to improve living conditions for people living in Africa, seem to have done little at the end. I think to improve the living standards is actually the tougher problem compared to how to get human live off the planet. As for learning to live on this planet comfortably, the first easy step is probably to adjust our working schedule to reduce traffic congestion and stop wasting all those fuels on unproductive activities that benefit no one. But even for something as simple as that, you will find the society is unable to change to better itself. So lets face it, a lot of human problems are self inflicted and you can spend trillions and it will not solve those issues. Can you expect richer countries spend their fortune building infrastructures in poor countries, with the sole aim of improving the human race? Then some freedom fighters come along and destroy most of those infrastructure. It should be obvious now that trying to improve human race is actually a harder problem than trying to establish some colony in outer space.

China's Challenge
By jackthule on 8/30/2013 11:19:49 AM , Rating: 2
I think the difference in the US space effort and that of China is that their program is a single minded effort to further the overall power of China in many ways, including prestige, resource extraction, manufacturing, military and scientific. They probably have a master plan extending decades into the future with a series of necessary steps along the way to be accomplished.
The US space program has been disjointed except for military applications. The Moon program was a historic effort accomplished at great cost, but our only goal was to beat the Russians. Afterwards we dismantled much of the space infrastructure we had built up without having the imagination to build on what we had done. For the past decades NASA has devoted itself to science missions without much thought to developing the economic aspects of space.
After the full scope of the Chinese effort becomes apparent I think the US will be prodded into a more economically meaningful program. The new asteroid mission may be a first step in this direction.

RE: China's Challenge
By w8gaming on 9/1/2013 3:54:24 AM , Rating: 2
I wonder if the asteroid mission is to eventually convert it into a space station, or convert it into spaceship. Seems to be an cheaper way to build a large structure in space than to burn expensive fuels and send all those building materials up. Seems to me until there is a much cheaper way to get energy, the most expensive part of space mission is always the energy. If energy is not an issue, we don't have to throw away all those launchers, can accelerate more and shorten travel time. Instead of having to spend 8 months just to reach Mars, it can probably be done within a month. Health concern will also be minimized as structure will be added to generate gravity and shield radiation, but it all requires lots of energy.

By voronwe on 9/2/2013 11:12:03 PM , Rating: 2
...if Panda Express can just get there and set up a stand before a Chinese manned landing.

Finally, a commercial case opens up for hiring Golden Spike. Those Taikonauts are going to want a nice hot meal!

They had to get it done before...
By voronwe on 9/2/2013 11:50:05 PM , Rating: 2
...somebody got there and won the Google X-Prize.

It would have sucked if a tiny commercial company got their lunar rover to the surface before China's national space program. They couldn't have afforded to take that chance.

Somebody in Beijing probably figured two years was a comfortable margin.

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki