backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 167 comment(s) - last by Penti.. on Aug 6 at 4:27 PM

GM tosses the turbocharged three cylinder engine out in favor of a naturally-aspirated four cylinder

Ever since the Chevrolet Volt was first announced in early 2007, it has garnered a lot of attention due to its radical design and unorthodox approach to vehicle propulsion. The Volt's main source of power comes from a lithium-ion battery pack which can provide enough juice to power the vehicle for 40 miles. When the battery pack's charge dips below 35%, a 1.0-liter, turbocharged three cylinder engine was commissioned to charge the batteries back to 100%. Alternatively, the Volt can be recharged using a household electrical outlet.

According to GM's Executive Director of Hybrid Powertrain Engineering, Larry Nitz, the Volt will be ditching the complex turbocharged three-cylinder engine in favor of a more conventional naturally-aspirated 1.4 liter four cylinder engine. For its given application in the Volt, Nitz says that the four cylinder engine provides better fuel economy which is key in a eco-friendly vehicle like the Volt.

Another advantage to going with the four cylinder engine is in refinement. While four cylinder engines aren't always known for smoothness or utmost refinement, they are much better in these respects than three cylinder engines. "The objective is to keep the engine off and when the engine comes on, you don't want to know it's on," said Nitz. "You want it really smooth and four cylinder is smoother than a three."

When it comes to packaging, the naturally-aspirated four cylinder engine doesn't have to accommodate the turbocharging or its requisite plumbing; thus it's lighter than original three cylinder engine envisioned for the Volt. The four cylinder engine, however, is still slightly longer than the three cylinder engine with its attachments, so changes to the vehicle packaging had to be made.

Nitz went on to say that the Volt's 16 kWh battery will provide the best range of performance for the vehicle when operating at a 35% to 85% charge. Once the four cylinder gasoline kicks in at below 35% charge, it will provide 50 kW to power the vehicle instead of the usual 100 kW provided by the lithium-ion battery pack.

Even when operating in this reduced capacity, the Volt will still be able to respond on command when a surge of power is needed. "Zero to sixty, passing maneuvers, you'll be fine, the ability to actually use more than about 50kW doesn't exist very frequently," explained Nitz.

The Chevrolet Volt has made the news quite frequently over the past month. Most recently, GM announced that it would work with utility companies to provide the infrastructure necessary to support electric charging facilities for electric vehicles like the Volt.

Earlier this month, it was reported that GM reduced the capacity of the fuel tank from 12 gallons to 7.2 gallons -- this cut the estimated driving range from 600 miles to 360 miles. Finally, GM Vice Chairman "Maximum" Bob Lutz in mid-June expressed his confidence that the Volt will arrive in showrooms in 2010.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Compromises to bring it to market?
By Darkskypoet on 7/27/2008 6:00:23 PM , Rating: 2
Is this just to bring it to market on time? Or are these compromises in place to lower the price? Or perhaps the fuel cap, and engine length are directly related in a design sense, thus its the simplest way to make the engine change. Either way, the drop in power from the engine, anybody following the volt enough to know if this is cause for concern performance wise?




RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By MisterChristopher on 7/27/2008 6:07:24 PM , Rating: 2
Don't know, but hopefully it will reduce total vehicle costs.


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By DigitalFreak on 7/27/2008 7:22:25 PM , Rating: 2
I doubt it. They just recently raised the expected price from $30k to $40k.


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By phxfreddy on 7/27/08, Rating: 0
By Jim28 on 7/27/2008 9:03:17 PM , Rating: 1
Been there, done that, got the wrinkles in my dick to prove it. God does it hurt!


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By shabby on 7/27/2008 7:54:09 PM , Rating: 2
Add some options, taxes, freight and its 50k out the door.
A fuel efficient 50k car... good job gm. I think i'll buy a 15k kia rio and swim in the 35k i just saved.


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By GlassHouse69 on 7/28/2008 1:11:21 AM , Rating: 2
yeah but your kia is a laughable piece of shit.

ill be riding around in my supercharged mini with driving lamps and style.

the volt has style.


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By 306maxi on 7/28/08, Rating: 0
By StevoLincolnite on 7/28/2008 5:02:28 AM , Rating: 2
Style can be brought in through Aerodynamics.


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By afkrotch on 7/28/2008 5:51:54 AM , Rating: 1
I don't think either the Mini or the Volt have style. Unless you're a woman.


By foolsgambit11 on 7/29/2008 2:19:37 PM , Rating: 2
I guess with an name like afkrotch, we should expect sexism like that.


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By Samus on 7/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By Noya on 7/28/2008 7:13:56 AM , Rating: 1
Touche.


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By Chaser on 7/28/2008 8:28:55 AM , Rating: 5
Um not Touche. As demonstrated by the Prius this is more than just gas mileage savings. The Volt is a significant step away from volatile gas price fluctuations. As the article indicates it can be plugged in to be recharged. A noteworthy option for many car owners.

And this "they don't do anything exceptionally well". My suggestion for your broad stroke, baseless dribble is to speak with your wallet and buy your exceptionally well Kia. Volt is a major undertaking for GM. And they are doing a fairly good job at responding to the market. Lets let the car make it to the market and then let the judging begin.


By teldar on 7/28/2008 5:01:01 PM , Rating: 3
Ok, that sounds far too rational. What are you doing posting after a little thinking?

T


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By kc77 on 7/28/2008 8:52:30 AM , Rating: 4
While it would be easy to bash GM on thier reluctance to actually promote fuel efficiant vehicles, in terms of quality they rank up their pretty high. Their luxury brand easily competes with any of the others out there, even if it does come in a drab grey with oversized buttons.


RE: Compromises to bring it to market?
By FITCamaro on 7/28/2008 9:51:33 AM , Rating: 3
Just another GM basher who hates American cars.