backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 245 comment(s) - last by MisterModder.. on Jun 25 at 3:20 PM


Under the new ACTA deal, iPods and other electronic devices will be subject to searches. It will be at border agents' discretion what material is infringing. The searches can be conducted without lawyers present and those found in violation will be fined and have their devices destroyed.  (Source: Canada.com)
Under the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) at Canadian border crossings laptops, discs, and iPods will be subject to search, destruction, and fines if infringed copyright material is found

Wikileaks, known for stirring up controversy, leaked secret plans by the U.S. government to enter into a far-reaching new internet monitoring and regulation act known as the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) with Japan, the European Commission, and Switzerland.  The new act was known in some circles as a "Pirate Bay killer", referring to the Swedish torrent site The Pirate Bay, as the new act criminalized nonprofit "facilitation of copyright infringement".  However, the bill also included provisions which would make many commonly used privacy tools illegal and would demand that ISPs provide the government with complete user histories.

Amid public outcry in the U.S. and Europe, a new country is looking to get into the fray.  News site Canada.com reports on details of the act's effects on another partner nation, Canada. International Trade Minister David Emerson announced in October that Canada will participate in ACTA.  Canadian officials view the act as a new North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) of sorts, this time focusing on copyright instead of trade.

Additional ramifications of the deal of interest to American and Canadian citizens are the new restrictions on travel.  The new act will make border agents essentially "copyright regulators".  They will be authorized under current provisions to search those crossing for illegal copyright materials.  Laptops, iPods and even cellular phones are among the devices that would be searched for illegal content. 

If they found infringed content such as ripped copies of DVDs or CDs they could detain the person.  The penalties are still being ironed out, but a fine for any materials found is planned.  It would be at the discretion of the border agents to determine what infringement is and what isn't.  Under the new act, even legally copied DVDs or CDs would be open to scrutiny.

David Fewer, staff counsel at the University of Ottawa's Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic is very alarmed at this development.  He states, "If Hollywood could order intellectual property laws for Christmas what would they look like? This is pretty close.  The process on ACTA so far has been cloak and dagger. This certainly raises concerns."

The leaked ACTA documents indicate that the new agreement marks a dramatic departure from previous anti-infringement efforts in that it authorizes government action against suspected infringers without any request from the copyright holders.  In the past the copyright holders, or organizations that represented them such as the RIAA or IFPI took action again infringers.  The new act gives government officials "authority to take action against infringers", essentially making them a government RIAA of sorts.

For some users the new act may be "bye bye" to their iPod or laptop.  Under the new act the border agents could destroy any devices found to hold copyright content that is deemed infringed.

The new agreement states that it’s oriented towards increased "civil enforcement" measures.  And don't plan on having a lawyer present; the act includes "authority to order ex parte searches" (searches without a lawyer present) and "and other preliminary measures".

At Canada's borders, agents already search for child pornography.  The new act would expand the frequency of these searches and put iPods, computer discs, and laptops under the search auspices of the border patrol.

Fewer takes issue to the secrecy in the international community surrounding the act.  He states, "We knew this existed, we filed an Access to Information request for this but all it provided us with was the title. All the rest of it was blacked out.  Those negotiations can take place behind closed doors. At the end of the day we may be provided with something that has been negotiated which is a `fait accompli' in which civil society gets no opportunity to critique it."

The new act has also been criticized as it operates outside other international trade organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) or the United Nations.  Under the agreement a governing council consisting of representatives from member nations would be created and make policy decisions.

Michael Geist, Canada research chair of Internet and E-commerce law at the University of Ottawa and expert on Canadian copyright law says that the government's behind doors behavior is quite ominous.  He states, "That's what happens when you conduct all of this behind closed doors.  The lack of consultation, the secrecy behind it and the speculation that this will be concluded within a matter of months without any real public input is deeply troubling"

Fewer and Geist both agree though, that once the act is adopted it will be difficult to back out.  If Canada does not comply, it may face big financial penalties as well, similar to those imposed during the Softwood Lumber trade dispute. 

The final decision on the acts adoption is believed to be made at the upcoming G-8 international summit in July 2008.  The agreement marks the most dramatic piece of international law enforcement and copyright to date.  If adopted it will truly transform the electronics world and touch the lives of many citizens.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Are you kidding me?
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2008 10:02:23 AM , Rating: 5
They can look at your iPod, laptop, etc. to see if the content on it is legit or not? Thats BS.

And people say we here in the US are invading people's privacy.




RE: Are you kidding me?
By JasonMick (blog) on 5/27/2008 10:18:09 AM , Rating: 5
Ummm....the U.S. government wrote and is championing this agreement. Our trade representative planned/wrote a large portion of it. Unfortunately this is a multinational effort...lots of countries are aboard, which makes it scarier.

And they don't just get to look at it. They can destroy it, if they think there's copyrighted material on it.

Want a lawyer? To bad, you don't get one.

Welcome to the brave new world of ACTA and the joys of ex parte searches.

(ps this really reminds me of Harold And Kumar: Escape From Guatanemo Bay)


RE: Are you kidding me?
By spluurfg on 5/27/2008 10:31:22 AM , Rating: 5
I don't get it though... it would be practically un-enforceable. How would they determine whether my ipod music was illegally downloaded or imported from a CD I own but didn't bring with me (hence the point of an ipod)?


RE: Are you kidding me?
By Nihility on 5/27/2008 10:38:34 AM , Rating: 5
Well, if the burden of proof is on you, they can just destroy it and go on with their day. Destroy first, ask questions later.

What could you possibly do about it?


RE: Are you kidding me?
By spluurfg on 5/27/2008 11:27:07 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly: they do have this power, but its like assessing import duties on items -- often enough it's simply not exercised because it's impractical to enforce.


RE: Are you kidding me?
By othercents on 5/27/2008 12:01:55 PM , Rating: 2
Make sure to take a disposable MP3 player with you on trips.

Other


RE: Are you kidding me?
By Adonlude on 5/27/2008 4:29:59 PM , Rating: 2
What a total joke. There is no way to fairly enforce this law. As an electrical engineer you can be sure that my electronic devices will be "broken and in need of repairs" whenever I cross a border.


RE: Are you kidding me?
By mindless1 on 5/27/2008 6:29:07 PM , Rating: 2
That would cause suspicion, seizure, and destruction. Non-working electronics have always raised a red flag, but in the past it was more often considered a bomb threat.


RE: Are you kidding me?
By RjBass on 5/27/2008 11:57:42 PM , Rating: 5
So I think now is a good time for those little MicroSD meory cards.


RE: Are you kidding me?
By imperator3733 on 5/28/2008 11:33:57 AM , Rating: 2
lol


RE: Are you kidding me?
By fonzdaman on 5/30/2008 12:24:06 AM , Rating: 2
As Peter Griffin would say "Canada Sux"


RE: Are you kidding me?
By imperator3733 on 5/28/2008 11:34:08 AM , Rating: 1
Never go to Canada again. Let's see how they like the decrease in tourism.


RE: Are you kidding me?
By michael67 on 5/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: Are you kidding me?
By imperator3733 on 6/2/2008 3:06:00 PM , Rating: 2
Since I live in the US, the only thing that I can do to protest a Canadian decision, like the border "guards", would be to not go there, and thereby not give the country and their economy my money. If enough people were to boycott Canada, they might realize that people do not like their judge-jury-executioner border guards and change their policy.

What I can do (and I have already done this) is send letters to my senators and my representative to express my extreme displeasure about ACTA, and tell them that if they vote for ACTA, they will not get my vote. (Yes, I said that, and I will do that.)

Hopefully, people in Canada will protest this border guard plan and get their representatives to stop it. Same with in Europe. I have done what I can already, so the only thing left for me to do is to not go to any of the countries that wish to enact ACTA and deny their economy of my money.


RE: Are you kidding me?
By Lerianis on 5/29/2008 9:17:49 PM , Rating: 2
Simply put: Sue the government and have this law overturned in court. It infringes WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too far on the "No search and seizure without a warrant" clause in the Constitution of the United States.
This would not even get ONE USE before it was overturned and stricken from the law books.


RE: Are you kidding me?
By bigjaicher on 6/2/2008 1:48:02 AM , Rating: 2
But this isn't a law of the United States, it's a law of Canada regarding citizens of other countries voluntarily entering their land. And if its against their constitution, they'll just refer to how we treat 'enemy combatants.' and call us hypocrites. I don't like the power that is being given out, but assuming that the people are even somewhat ethical (not schadenfreude sociopaths), only obvious acts of piracy will be punished (i.e. an unlabeled CD filled with keygens and such)


RE: Are you kidding me?
By arazok on 5/27/2008 10:46:01 AM , Rating: 5
It's very enforceable, as customs is under no obligation to prove their claims. They are judge, jury, and executioner. If they even suspect content is illegal, they will just take your iPod. Done, have a nice day.

There are many cases of people caught carrying $10,000+ in cash across the border, which by law must be declared. If you are caught by customs, they just take your money, even if there is no evidence of criminal intent.

Reverse onus - it should be unconstitutional.