backtop


Print 32 comment(s) - last by seraphim1982.. on Apr 1 at 1:57 PM


  (Source: Digital2Disc)
Netflix is stepping up to make Canadian members' lives easier by lowering data usage by two-thirds

Netflix announced yesterday that it would reduce data usage for its Canadian members in an effort to comply with data caps in this area. Neil Hunt, chief product officer at Netflix, made the announcement on the Netflix Blog allowing Canadians to enjoy video streaming through Netflix without data cap worries.

Canadians have experienced recent troubles regarding data, such as the CRTC's decision to end unlimited use internet plans. Many Canadian ISPs "enforce monthly caps on the total amount of data consumed." In addition, AT&T is looking to place new data caps on DSL and U-Verse customers here in the U.S. 

Now, Netflix is stepping up to make Canadian members' lives easier by lowering data usage by two-thirds. According to Hunt, Canadians can now watch 30 hours of Netflix video streaming per month and use only 9 GB of data. Before the data reduction, 30 hours of video streaming would use 70 GB of data. 

Hunt also noted that the reduced data has only a small impact on video quality, but the picture continues to be satisfactory. In fact, a Netflix member can adjust data usage and picture quality with three settings that Netflix created. 

The three settings are "Good," which is the default setting with the low data use per hour of 0.3 GB; "Better," which has better picture quality and uses 0.7 GB per hour, and "Best," which has the highest picture quality and uses 1.0 GB per hour or 2.3 GB per hour when streaming HD. 

The "Good" option allows 625 kbps/64kbps of video/audio while the "Better" option limits video/audio to 1300 kbps/192 kbps and the "Best" option can use up to 4800 kbps/384 kbps for 1080p HD video and 5.1 audio. For non-HD content, the "Best" option would limit video/audio to 2200 kbps/192 kbps. With these settings, the "Good" option would use up to 9 GB for 30 hours of content while "Better" would use less than 20 GB and "Best" would use less than 67 GB.  

No matter which setting you choose, Netflix will stream additional data as a buffer when content starts. Also, start, stop, rewind and seek activity increases the data Netflix streams, but it will amount "to less than a few minutes' worth."

In addition, Netflix adaptive streaming may reduce the data rate stream for those with lower speed, or to decrease interruptions in case of congestion.  

Netflix plans to improve its streaming service without the use of large amounts of data. In the meantime, members can adjust their settings by going to "Your Account" and the "Manage Video Quality" page. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

kudos to netflix
By kattanna on 3/29/2011 12:58:41 PM , Rating: 5
kudos to netflix for being on top of this issue for those who really are affected by offering them control over this.

shame on those ISP's that are doing such to the "customers"




RE: kudos to netflix
By tng on 3/29/2011 1:31:55 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
shame on those ISP's that are doing such to the "customers"
I agree 100%.

I also predict that ISPs that compete with Netflix for things like VOD services will find some other way to undermine the service to swing the push customers back to the service that they provide.... It is nice for them to have such good friends in the government so they can change the rules.

Of course I could just be pessimistic though...


RE: kudos to netflix
By tng on 3/29/2011 1:35:54 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
VOD services will find some other way to undermine the service to swing the push customers back to the service that they provide....

Crap, you think I would see that in the preview of the post.

I meant that the ISPs will find a way to undermine Netflix sooner or later and force customers back to the ISP service.


RE: kudos to netflix
By Iaiken on 3/29/2011 1:41:06 PM , Rating: 2
Why win on the virtues of your services when you can just act underhandedly and maintain the expensive status quo?


RE: kudos to netflix
By WalksTheWalk on 3/29/2011 4:29:12 PM , Rating: 2
This is exactly why the Comcast acquisition of NBC was a bad idea. A huge distribution company should not also be able to have a huge stake in content ownership. It promotes conflicts of interest and anti-competitive behavior.

What does the FCC not understand about allowing companies that are "too big to fail". Either companies are allowed to fail or their size and reach needs to restricted.


RE: kudos to netflix
By tng on 3/29/2011 5:17:28 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Either companies are allowed to fail or their size and reach needs to restricted.
They should be allowed to fail. Restrictions on size and reach, short of stopping a monopoly, is not really a good idea.

Think of all the money we all would have saved if US Government had made the hard decision to let allot of the companies fail instead of bailing them out. At least our Dollar would have been worth something still.


RE: kudos to netflix
By GulWestfale on 3/29/2011 7:14:56 PM , Rating: 2
but millions of additional jobs would have been lost, which would have brought your economy even further down.


RE: kudos to netflix
By tng on 3/30/2011 3:55:05 PM , Rating: 3
I don't know if it would have been millions or not, but it would have been more.

The future is what we all should be worried about and letting companies succeed or fail on their own merits would have meant stronger companies in the future.


RE: kudos to netflix
By eskimospy on 3/29/2011 10:04:13 PM , Rating: 2
Because nobody wants five sets of fiber lines being dug under their house.

This should be obvious.


RE: kudos to netflix
By Kurz on 3/29/2011 11:31:55 PM , Rating: 2
Doesnt have to be dug up. They usually dig on public property and if you want it they come in and wire your house.


RE: kudos to netflix
By zixin on 3/30/2011 1:12:58 PM , Rating: 2
You do realize that the bail outs are loans that the companies have to pay back, such as CitiBank and GM already done. The Government actually made a nice profit on them.


RE: kudos to netflix
By tng on 3/30/2011 3:40:41 PM , Rating: 2
Not true...

GM and allot of the banks got both, bailout money which they did not have to pay back and loans that they did.

In GMs case they used the bailout money to payback the loans in large part shortly after they annouced that they had had a profitable year. Smart the way they did it since the Feds left it open for them to do it that way. They made it seem like in just 2 short years they had made the money to pay it back when that wasn't really the case.


RE: kudos to netflix
By seraphim1982 on 4/1/2011 1:57:14 PM , Rating: 2
Whatever happened to "UNLIMITED" internet......
hahahah


RE: kudos to netflix
By seraphim1982 on 4/1/2011 1:57:16 PM , Rating: 2
Whatever happened to "UNLIMITED" internet......
hahahah


Streaming has a LONG way to go......
By rdhood on 3/29/2011 2:25:35 PM , Rating: 3
We keep hearing how the death knell of Blu Ray is ringing, and it's bell ringer is Netflix/Amazon/Facebook/streamer-du-jour. LOL. Until the infrastructure exists so that most people can stream HD at about 4GB/hr, online streaming will be relegated to the "gimme now" crowed. I dont think people are buying HD sets to watch less-than-DVD quality streaming services.




RE: Streaming has a LONG way to go......
By tng on 3/29/2011 2:57:18 PM , Rating: 2
They have been predictions of the death of DVD with the introduction of Blu Ray, but it didn't happen.

At least Blu Ray was a step up from DVD. For years I have heard about the death of CDs due to mp3 files. Hasn't really happened yet and wont until mp3 files can be ran at 700+kbs like a CD. Same with this, BD had far greater data density and thus better PQ. I can't see that changing anytime soon....


By espaghetti on 3/29/2011 11:51:59 PM , Rating: 2
The death of CD's won't be because of mp3's, most of today's artists just suck. No one buys them.

Then again I'm in my mid 30's. Isn't that when you start talking about these young whipper-snappers and there devil music?


By Taft12 on 3/30/2011 3:16:51 PM , Rating: 2
If you think CD's have been heading in a direction other than death for the past several years, you haven't been paying attention.


RE: Streaming has a LONG way to go......
By Shadowself on 3/29/2011 8:51:04 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Until the infrastructure exists so that most people can stream HD at about 4GB/hr, online streaming will be relegated to the "gimme now" crowed.

How about Blu-ray at a maximum of approximately 20 GB/hr or the more typical average of about 10 GB/hr for most of the movies out today. At 4 GB/hr it is still way less quality than you'll get on Blu-ray.

But you're right, until the online data rate approaches Blu-ray it will be relegated to the "gimme now" crowd. For anyone interested in a true HD (1080p) quality picture Blu-ray will be around for quite some time.


By Netscorer on 3/30/2011 1:53:23 PM , Rating: 2
Massive popularity of Netflix shows that video streaming reaches way beyond "gimme now" crowd. For most of the people Blu-Ray did not provide any substantial benefits over DVD. You can't hear 7.1 surround sound if you only have stereo speakers on your TV and you can't give a damn about 1080p picture if you are not sitting at just perfect distance and angle towards you TV screen or you don't have just perfect lighting in your room as those factors far outweight the resolution factor.
At least DVD brought convenience, reliability and portability over VHS tapes. Blu-Ray does not improve on any of these factors. Netflix streaming does.
And the crappy movie will still stink, whether you watch it over Blu-Ray, DVD or via Netflix streaming, just like good movie would still compel you, regardless the source.


Dunno
By Ammohunt on 3/29/2011 2:18:57 PM , Rating: 3
Good isn't good enough for me i want the highest quality video/audio possible for my home theatre system. They need to build out more local caching servers so the majority of the data isn't carried over the ISP's backhaul. Come to think of it wasn't a huge amount of capicity freed up recently with the takedown of the rostok spam bot net?




RE: Dunno
By AssBall on 3/29/2011 3:39:50 PM , Rating: 1
You have any idea how much it would cost to build, manage, and maintain hundreds of local cache servers with Netflix, Amazon, etc. libraries stored on them, not to mention the legal BS?

In your dreams...


RE: Dunno
By Ammohunt on 3/29/2011 3:57:07 PM , Rating: 4
yes i do since its already been done its called Akamai.


RE: Dunno
By Taft12 on 3/29/2011 5:01:41 PM , Rating: 2
Despite the stunning ignorance of the first responder to your post, you can see the problem created by the conflict of interest such as the NBC/Comcast alliance, or Rogers cable offerings/internet service here in Canada.

It's not that it can't be done. It can and has been done for years all over the internet. It's the political motivation to NOT do it.


RE: Dunno
By sprockkets on 3/29/2011 8:07:13 PM , Rating: 2
errr, it exists already, unfortunately as your cable providers VOD


by only reading title
By darckhart on 3/29/2011 1:45:35 PM , Rating: 5
by only reading the title, i thought to myself that the only way to do this was to lower the quality of the video. i'm sure everyone else thought that too. ok, now how much will they lower it?

Well at dvd res, good = 625 kbps is alright on your 20" monitor but terrible on the 50" tv. And best = 1080p hd = 4800 kbps is downright laughable. i'm glad netflix is being helpful, but geesh, i'll take the mail-me-the-dvds option.

but how bout REMOVING THE DATA CAPS. guess what? STOP OVERSELLING YOUR SERVICE and you won't have any of these "unable to support usage" problems.




RE: by only reading title
By StevoLincolnite on 3/29/2011 4:16:47 PM , Rating: 2
I don't see why providers don't just capture the streams and bring it into their network and make it data-free.

They do it in Australia... Some ISP's provide free Xbox Live/iView/Local Gaming Servers/Steam the works and advertise such features to grab the attention of users.

Kinda works out well for me that way to... I get a cheaper plan as most content doesn't count towards my usage, so I have no need for a massive monthly download limit.


RE: by only reading title
By Netscorer on 3/30/2011 1:58:16 PM , Rating: 2
One way would be to optimize video streaming encoding. Just like with mp3 audio encoding, you can get "pretty good" video without substantial bandwidth.


Caps sucks
By supermitsuba on 3/29/2011 12:58:12 PM , Rating: 2
But at least it is driving innovation for these companies to be efficient and still comply with the demand. Now they just have to get a larger selection of A movies on there and it will be win-win.




By ZachDontScare on 3/29/2011 3:55:27 PM , Rating: 2
I hope they let everyone make these choices. I watch a lot of TV shows online via netflix. I'm not a picture snob, so I dont 'demand' perfect quality video. I'd rather have lower bitrate video and fewer 'internet connection has slowed' messages from their server (which I get even if my connection hasnt actually slowed, so I assume its on netflix's side of things).




FYI
By 3DoubleD on 3/30/2011 11:43:15 AM , Rating: 2
FYI... The attempt to eliminate unlimited plans in Canada was halted by public pressure. I am still enjoying unlimited 15/1 cable from Teksavvy for $50/mo.

Also, for Netflix to ever hope to get me as a customer, they will need a "best-est" quality setting. 1080p video needs at least 10,000 kbps and preferably accompanied by full bitrate (640 kbps) 5.1 AC3. If that was available I might just abandon other means of watching older movies/TV.




Telcos and ISP's
By whiplash55 on 3/31/2011 1:10:57 PM , Rating: 2
Greed knows no borders.




"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki