backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 137 comment(s) - last by Xietsu.. on May 26 at 11:21 PM


Sarcos Inc. employee Rex Jameson is the Sarcos Suit's test pilot. With the suit he can bench press 500 lbs, head a soccer ball, climb stairs, and punch (pulverize) a punching bag.  (Source: AP)
Real life technologies mimics the comic books with breakthroughs in human exoskeletons.

The summer's hottest blockbuster thus far has been Iron Man -- not even the runaway hit Grand Theft Auto IV could slow it down.  The movie centers around a super hero using a high tech suit to perform heroic feats no ordinary man could.  What's intriguing is just how close real life technology is to creating a slightly less insanely overpowered "Iron Man" suit.

In the first entry of a two part series, this article examines the developments in exoskeleton technology from an enterprising startup recently acquired by a major defense contractor.  The exoskeleton starts with a simple concept -- while large war machines like tanks and armored personnel carriers (APCs) are mighty weapons, they lack the maneuverability of ground soldiers and provide a large target.  However, ground soldiers lack the strength to carry sufficient stopping power to take on heavy vehicles.

Sarcos Inc. has taken this concept and run with it, producing a mature exoskeleton design that may just possibly lead to the first real life "Iron Man" suit.  Sarcos comes from a decidedly non-militaristic background of designing robots for "Jurassic Park" rides at the Universal Studios theme park.  However, the contractor quickly morphed into a military contractor embarking on an exciting new project -- the Sarcos Suit.

While athletic, Sarcos engineer Rex Jameson, standing at 5'11" is no superman.  While he can press a modest 200 lbs on a good day, his strength is by no means superhuman.  Until he puts on the Sarcos Suit that is.  Gripping the claw-like hand guides of the exoskeleton, Jameson recently ripped off dozens of 500 lb presses at a recent demonstration of the suit.

The stunned audience eventually got bored, because Jameson just wasn't stopping, it was far too easy.  Says Jameson, "Everyone gets bored much more quickly than I get tired."

The experience proved an exciting demo of the 150 lb suit's potential to give the soldier of the future superpowers.  The U.S. Army, which is funding Sarcos, hopes that the technology will be used on the battlefield.  It has given Sarcos a $10 million, two-year contract to develop the suit.  Initial applications will be off the battlefield and will include heavy lifting and cargo operations.

The suit works on a basic level by detecting the user's every movement and amplifying it.  The suit currently has a rather impressive 30 minute battery life, and can operate indefinitely tethered to a power cord.  Sarcos hopes to extend the battery life so that the suit can operate for longer periods of time on the battlefield.  They also hope to bring down the cost, which is currently rather high. 

Stephen Jacobsen, chief designer of the Sarcos suit, says that human muscle movement amplification, a frequent comic fantasy, has become a reality.  He states, "Everybody likes the idea of being a superhero, and this is all about expanding the capabilities of a human."

While the army started exoskeleton research as early as 1995, the Sarcos suit is the first major success to date.  The suit so impressed Waltham, Massachusetts-based defense contracting giant Raytheon, that it bought Sarcos Inc. this past November.

Jack Obusek, a former colonel now employed in the Army's Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center, foresees the suits initially providing invaluable support.  From loading heavy ammo crates, to fixing tanks in the battlefield that would otherwise have to be scrapped to prevent American tank from falling into enemy hands, the potential is enormous he feels.

Jacobsen adds that the technology may also serve home-front uses, helping construction workers build, helping firemen carry gear inside burning houses, and helping disabled people move more freely.  Jacobsen states, "We see the value being realized when these suits can be built in great numbers for both military and commercial uses, and they start coming down in cost to within the range of the price of a small car."

While Jacobsen declines to estimate an exact price for the mass-produced version of the suit, the "price of a small car" comment seems exciting indeed.  However, certainly such a possibility would raise questions of restrictions, as having a host of super-power endowed citizens might lead to dangerous possibilities.

Meanwhile Sarcos is concentrating on the power issue.  While noisy, Sarcos says a gas engine is one possibility.  A small gas engine could fit inside the suits backpack, they say.  Obusek states, "The power issue is probably the No. 1 challenge standing in the way of getting this thing in the field."

Obusek says that while fine-tuning is still needed, the good news is Sarcos seems to have overcome the challenge of amplifying muscle movements by pairing super-fast microprocessors to detect joint movement with powerful mechanics.  The system processes its data in a central computer and then actuates powerful hydraulic valves, which mimics the human body's tendons in a natural, but powered up movement.

The suit lags slightly behind human response times.  Obusek states, "With all the previous attempts at this technology, there has been a slight lag time between the intent of the human, and the actual movement of the machine."

In a demonstration, Jameson was able to bounce a soccer ball off his helmeted head, punch a punching bag (not as fast as a boxer, but at a reasonable pace), and slowly ascend a flight of stairs.

Jameson says the suit takes a bit of getting used to. He states, "It feels less agile than it is.  Because of the way the control laws work, it's ever so slightly slower than I am. And because we are so in tune with our bodies' responses, this tiny delay initially made me tense." 

However, he quickly adapted and has discovered that the human body uses the suit in unforeseen ways.  He explains, "I can regain my balance naturally after stumbling -- something I discovered completely by accident.  It takes no special training, beyond learning to relax and trust the robot."

While the suit can't fly, it could certainly lug some impressive firepower on the battlefield someday with a few modifications.  As to the flying, stay tuned for part two of making a real life "Iron Man".



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Bill of Rights?
By dever on 5/16/2008 1:41:30 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
as having a host of super-power endowed citizens might lead to dangerous possibilities
I'm guessing you're not a fan of the 2nd amendment either?

It's funny how people inherantly are comfortable with government (the single entity with a monopoly on the legal use of deadly force) having certain technology and not individuals.




RE: Bill of Rights?
By Misty Dingos on 5/16/2008 1:49:12 PM , Rating: 5
Fear of an over arching government has been replaced by a paranoid fear of your next door neighbor.

I am not sure which of those is sadder.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By michal1980 on 5/16/2008 1:54:33 PM , Rating: 5
why not fear both?

oh and can I get a suit :-p


RE: Bill of Rights?
By tastyratz on 5/16/2008 2:43:23 PM , Rating: 2
there's a waiting period


RE: Bill of Rights?
By Ryanman on 5/17/2008 7:09:48 PM , Rating: 4
because we all know that most gun related deaths are attributed to men shooting their cheating wives, as opposed to gang violence using stolen weapons : D


RE: Bill of Rights?
By i3arracuda on 5/16/2008 2:18:38 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Fear of an over arching government has been replaced by a paranoid fear of your next door neighbor.


My next door neighbor can't control how I live.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By Carl B on 5/16/2008 2:28:55 PM , Rating: 5
But he could kill you.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By Kromis on 5/16/2008 2:51:48 PM , Rating: 1
Wow, that is the most impressive reply I have read today


RE: Bill of Rights?
By Myg on 5/16/2008 3:03:02 PM , Rating: 2
If he had to kill you, that means he couldn't control you. To allow someone to defeat you as a person can be more damaging to your soul/being and those around you then being killed outright.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By Parhel on 5/16/2008 3:09:49 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
If he had to kill you, that means he couldn't control you.


. . . or he could just be crazy.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By sinful on 5/17/2008 2:12:13 AM , Rating: 2
In which case he just might kill you with his bare hands, since people certainly don't need weapons to kill each other....
(it just helps)


RE: Bill of Rights?
By rcc on 5/16/2008 4:43:52 PM , Rating: 3
He that can destroy a thing, controls it.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By HVAC on 5/20/2008 10:20:59 AM , Rating: 2
Wrong.

Control implies an imposition of will strong enough to overcome a target's resistance to said will. Proof of control is in target's behavior when no immediate sense of danger or retribution is detectable.

Destruction of a target can occur without overcoming target's resistance to will.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By Chernobyl68 on 5/16/2008 5:40:26 PM , Rating: 2
yeah, but I'd be dead, and not much concerned that my soul was in good shape...


RE: Bill of Rights?
By i3arracuda on 5/16/2008 3:16:11 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
But he could kill you.


So could any idiot with a gun.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By masher2 (blog) on 5/16/2008 3:36:20 PM , Rating: 5
Or a knife. Or a baseball bat...or even just his fists.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By Schrag4 on 5/16/2008 4:23:05 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah. So we ban guns and rely on the police and military to keep us safe from people with guns. Maybe we should create an arm of the government that will come to our house and cut our steaks for us. I guess we really need frying pans, so I'm ok with a 5 day waiting period and a backround check for those.


RE: Bill of Rights?
By dever on 5/16/2008 4:33:13 PM , Rating: 5
Don't forget sharpened pencils. I've always had a very rational paranoia about sharpened pencils. Or perhaps the pencil-sharpeners themselves

"Pencils don't kill people... pencil-sharpeners do." Or is it the trees from which pencils are made? Ooooh, I know... it's the CO2 taken in by the trees from which pencils are made! Finally, the answer as to why CO2 is bad.