backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 12 comment(s) - last by Christopher1.. on Nov 17 at 5:47 AM

Congress wants to build a map of America’s broadband service

Congress has signaled that it may be ready for Internet reform that some consider desperately needed, as it has given the go-ahead on two different but important broadband bills.

The Broadband Census of America Act of 2007 has so far made the furthest progress, passing the House in a voice vote last Tuesday. More formally known as H.R. 3919, the Broadband Census of America Act mainly seeks to perform a thorough survey of America’s existing broadband services.

The FCC is ordered to conduct annual assessments on broadband deployment statistics, and aggregate them in a fashion which compares them to other parts of the country, as well as countries. Additionally, the FCC is also required to periodically survey consumers and examine the real-world speeds they experience as well as what applications they use with said service.

H.R. 3919 also requires the Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to maintain a “broadband inventory map” that shows broadband availability geographically, from both public and private service providers. Local “technology planning entities” – city committees, academic, and commercial institutions – are invited to assist with this process, and subject to available funding, may be offered grant money to assist with the assessment process.

More importantly, this broadband map would need to be available to anyone over the internet and identify the broadband offerings of an area down to individual ZIP+4 codes.

S. 1853, a.k.a. the Community Broadband Act of 2007, recently made it through the Congress’ Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. S. 1863 seeks to assist municipalities trying to launch public/private broadband networks similar to Google’s municipal Wi-Fi project, by classifying such networks as public utilities and prohibiting local or state government statutes from regulating or otherwise interfering with the process of building and providing public broadband service.

By reclassifying the municipal broadband as a regulated utility, the bill’s supporters  – which include the likes of Google, Intel, as well as Senator Ted “Series of Tubes” Stevens  – hope that municipalities and rural communities that wish to implement their own broadband service can do so unimpeded by competing corporate interests.

Recent reports indicate that S.1863 should soon be scheduled debate within the Senate.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I don't think this is good.
By tjr508 on 11/16/2007 11:29:44 AM , Rating: 2
Playing politics with the web can only lead to further regulation. I'm writing my congressman and telling him to keep his greedy hands off of the Internet.




RE: I don't think this is good.
By JarvisTheGray on 11/16/07, Rating: 0
RE: I don't think this is good.
By Fin64 on 11/16/2007 3:11:52 PM , Rating: 2
Actually according to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration, investor-owned utility residential rates are consistently about 10% above those of public power utilities -- www.appanet.org/files/PDFs/ppcostsless2005.pdf

Municipal broadband systems have been consistently found to introduce better services, rates and consumer choice than markets where there is no such competitor to the incumbents. Moreover, in many areas of the country municipal systems are the only place where community-wide fiber to the home systems are being developed, this is critically important given our falling status in the world in broadband deployment.


RE: I don't think this is good.
By velma on 11/16/2007 6:45:04 PM , Rating: 2
In Texas, the municipal utilities charge about half of what the corporations charge. Example: If the national average cost of a certain amount of energy is $100 (for easy comparison), the same amount costs on average $140 in Houston and a little higher in Dallas. Both of these cities have corporations "competing" for customers. In Austin and San Antonio, where the electricity provider is the city itself, their rates are about $75.


NO
By BAFrayd on 11/16/2007 10:54:25 PM , Rating: 2
Two sure things will come from this: Federal taxes and Federal regulation.
No No NO!




RE: NO
By Christopher1 on 11/17/2007 5:47:48 AM , Rating: 1
Federal regulation is necessary in this case. I don't understand why people are so against federal regulation of companies like Comcast and other high-speed providers.

We need some regulation to keep things like the "Bittorrent Debacle" from happening again.


Map
By SavagePotato on 11/17/2007 1:09:11 AM , Rating: 3
I would like to help the government out, and have done so in creating an exhaustivlely detailed map of the internet for their cause.

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff53/LithiumPot...




Good idea
By mcnabney on 11/16/2007 10:25:24 AM , Rating: 2
This reminds me of the Rural Electrification Act.




Can of Worms
By drew494949 on 11/16/2007 11:12:36 AM , Rating: 2
Quick, someone check to see if SkyNet is fully authorized in this package.




Wow
By aharris on 11/16/07, Rating: -1
I didn't laugh
By sj420 on 11/16/07, Rating: -1
RE: I didn't laugh
By AlphaVirus on 11/16/2007 12:20:20 PM , Rating: 2
Frantic much?


"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki