backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 117 comment(s) - last by goku.. on Feb 12 at 3:45 PM

Just say no; Britain refuses to adopt next generation of Microsoft products

In a rather controversial move, the British public school system announced a countrywide policy decision that it will not adopt Microsoft's Windows Vista or Office 2007 in its schools and offices

The move is the latest in a series of woes for the struggling Vista.  Despite sufficient sales, the operating system has failed to obtain high marks from many critics.  Its detractors included PC World after it featured the OS as its disappointment of the year

Analysts point to the numerous performance and security issues that have caused the OS to struggle to match the success of Windows XP, particularly in the face of Apple Inc.'s stylish OS X Leopard.  Despite being outsold considerably by Vista, Leopard managed to steal much of the media attention and glowing reviews.

The British Educational Communications and Technology Agency, also known as Becta, governs the educational systems tech adoption.  Becta's decision effectively bans adoption of Office '07 and Vista on any existing machines.  Government employees can buy new machines with the software, but the agency strongly recommends against it; suggesting instead to buy Linux products, such as the OpenOffice.org desktop package.

The reasoning behind Becta's decision specifically cited that the new OS and office suite provides little in the way of improvement, while bringing to the table a broad array of potential problems.  In the report
Stephen Lucy, Becta's executive director of strategic technologies, explains, "Our advice is to be sure there is a strong business case for upgrading to these products as the costs are significant and the benefits remain unclear."

The report also blasted Microsoft for refusing to support the Open Document Format (ODF), championed by
International Organization for Standardization.  Microsoft instead chose to adopt another open format known as Office Open XML.  The report states, "Microsoft should provide native support for the ODF file format increasingly used in competitor products and those that are free to use."

The move follows suit with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) decision ban Vista, Office 2007, and Internet Explorer 7 due to similar concerns.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Really??
By Spivonious on 1/15/2008 3:44:56 PM , Rating: 5
I can see not recommending Vista, since it does have it's share of first version woes, but Office? I haven't used it since the public beta but it ran fine and I loved the new interface. It made things much easier to find.




RE: Really??
By JackBeQuick on 1/15/2008 3:46:30 PM , Rating: 5
My sentiment exactly. PowerPoint 2007 and Excel 2007 are fantastic. Word 2007 is pretty marginal in new features, but there's some neat stuff here and there.


RE: Really??
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 1/15/2008 3:48:32 PM , Rating: 5
Yeah, PowerPoint 2007 is pretty much like comparing a Model T to a new Bently. It's totally a great app, and nobody can say anything to change my mind about that :)


RE: Really??
By Souka on 1/15/2008 5:07:45 PM , Rating: 2
The better pivot tables, and more cell count support in Excel2007 is awesome...great for my work.

And of course, Office2007 is growing in support...real bad idea to teach the "future" an old software app...real bad idea.


RE: Really??
By themadmilkman on 1/15/2008 11:53:53 PM , Rating: 2
Since it will still be the standard when they enter the workplace, amirite?


RE: Really??
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 1/16/2008 8:24:08 AM , Rating: 3
Most comapnies will move for rapid adoption of Office 2007, and Vista will come along in time. The tangible benefits professionally for Office 2007 is quite high, with Excel and Power Point being light years ahead of previous versions. Tangible benefits of Vista are reduced support costs, but the cost to procure currently outweighs in the short term, the cost savings in support. This makes adoption of Vista slow. It will be phased in during hardware refreshes, this is typical at most companies.


RE: Really??
By qwertyz on 1/16/08, Rating: 0
RE: Really??
By eye smite on 1/15/08, Rating: 0
RE: Really??
By mikeyD95125 on 1/15/2008 10:30:49 PM , Rating: 1
I don't know which software your referring to (Vista or Office) but it sounds like you have not used Office and are just bashing MS. You should try it out. It is a worthy upgrade over office 2003 or others. And it is much faster than open office.


RE: Really??
By eye smite on 1/16/08, Rating: 0
RE: Really??
By mindless1 on 1/16/2008 9:43:28 AM , Rating: 2
People should try something they don't need? I hate to break it to you but many companies get along fine with Office 2000. They may have a few newer office boxes just to read the odd incompatible files but then again that's one of the reasons cited in the article for shunning O2K7.

It seems hard for some to understand but basically your subjective needs are not objective needs. As much as you may feel O2K7 is important, the basis is not necessarily applicable to others else they would have switched too. We don't live in a vacuum, are aware O2K7 exists and would switch if the need was there.


RE: Really??
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 1/15/2008 3:48:47 PM , Rating: 5
Yeah, I actually like Office 2007's interface and it it's a great upgrade.

Vista, however, I can do without. It's not that Vista is bad, it's just that XP gets the job done.


RE: Really??
By FITCamaro on 1/15/2008 4:06:00 PM , Rating: 5
For a corporate environment, yes, Vista doesn't offer much.

For home users it, to me, offers a lot of advantages. Better security, better user account implementation, DX10, and several other improvements. Sure it uses a little more memory than XP. But you can get 4GB of RAM for under $100. So to me its not an issue.


RE: Really??
By djcameron on 1/15/2008 4:12:21 PM , Rating: 2
I love the new interface in Office 2007. I'm still running Vista on my desktop PC, but there are many things that irritate me. If SP1 doesn't fix the issues, then I will return to XP.


RE: Really??
By Christopher1 on 1/16/2008 3:21:04 PM , Rating: 1
What things irritate you? Many things that people have basically whined about in Vista, they are just things changing and then not liking that.

The only ding I personally had on Vista was that I had Office 2007 get corrupted somehow and it would not re-install, but I was looking through my registry and found the problem there.

There were these WEIRD ass entries under Local Machine in the registry, with all sorts of invalid characters. Once I deleted them..... WOW! I got all my functionality back and Office 2007 would re-install once again.

I really think that I got hit with a virus somehow (don't know how, since I am paranoid about my stuff) but I think I got rid of the virus.


RE: Really??
By goku on 2/12/2008 3:45:48 PM , Rating: 2
I thought microsoft was trying to move away from using the registry and that was a big feature of vista... Sounds like they're all talk and no show. After dealing with the mess that is the registry, I'd much prefer to use INF files once again, at least those can be easily changed/repaired.


RE: Really??
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 1/15/2008 4:13:31 PM , Rating: 2
Even at home, it's not much of an improvement.

I have a desktop PC with Windows Vista Home Premium and an Eee PC with Windows XP Home. Both get the job done.

I don't game on my PC, so I don't give a crap about DX10. Better security and better user account implementations? I'm the only one that uses my PC and I have it behind a firewall and use anti-virus and anti-spyware protection -- just as I do with Windows XP.

Upgrading to Vista was a waste for me. The only good thing was that I got a ton of freebies during the Vista launch with I then unloaded on eBay to bring down the initial cost of entry for Vista.

Now I'm not saying the Vista won't be an improvement for some people, but then again, using XP instead of upgrading to Vista isn't going to hurt most home users at all.


RE: Really??
By TomZ on 1/15/2008 4:24:32 PM , Rating: 3
I disagree. The new multimedia features in Vista make it a no-brainer for home users. Such as built-in DVD player, DVD authoring, better management of photos and other media, etc. These are features that average home users will appreciate in Vista that don't exist in XP.

In addition, the other strong point in Vista is its built-in "self-healing" capabilities in some areas, its ability to self-diagnose and correct some kinds of problems. This is great for home users who may not be highly-skilled PC techs.

By your criteria, any OS can "get the job done," and there would be no point in further development in the OS field. But the reality is that new features and improvements are made in each version that make the user experience better in an evolutionary way. The problem with some folks is that they expect a revolutionary OS upgrade, which quite frankly isn't going to happen because of the maturity of the field.


RE: Really??
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 1/15/2008 4:29:36 PM , Rating: 2
That's if home users even take advantage of those features or even know that they're are there.

Most people I know (friends/family) just install whatever crap comes with their digital camera/camcorder instead of using the stuff that's built into Windows.

And just about every new computer sold today comes with some DVD player installed like PowerDVD or WinDVD (or whatever they call it these days).

I'd really like to know how many people are using the built-in utilities vs. third-party applications.