backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 86 comment(s) - last by Holytrinity.. on Mar 28 at 10:10 PM


"No Country For Old Men" is a Blu-ray Disc top-seller
"No Country For Old Men" pushes Blu-ray Disc to nine million sold

With Blu-ray Disc the high-definition winner, it will no longer have to play in any sort of numbers race against a competing format. Still, that does not prevent tracking firms from keeping tabs on the gradual growth of the format.

Particularly since the beginning of 2008, when the writing was freshly written on the wall thanks to Warner Bros., Blu-ray Disc sales have picked up the pace considerably. According to Hollywood in Hi-Def, HMR research figured that Blu-ray Disc movie sales hit the 3 million mark in the first 11 weeks of this year. Should the pace continue, the format should hit at least 15 million units for 2008.

To put things into perspective, only 6 million Blu-ray Disc movies were sold since the format’s inception through 2007. While the growing number of players on the market directly affects software sales, consumers may now be willing to purchase more software with HD DVD out of the picture.

Helping push Blu-ray Disc to the nine million total mark as of mid-March was Miramax’s recent release of No Country For Old Men. Spurred by its Oscar win for Best Picture, No Country For Old Men sold 68,000 units within its first week of release – twice as many as the second best-selling Blu-ray Disc movie, Hitman.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

BR needs a boost
By martinrichards23 on 3/28/2008 7:18:38 AM , Rating: 2
The only thing I see can make BR a success in the short/medium term is if a film comes out that genuinely looks a lot better in HD (and not just to us geeks, but to your mum and dad as well), and it catches peoples imagination, prompting them to purchase a Blu-ray DVD player.

Like when there are large sporting events, sales of large TVs go up a lot because people want to make the most of it.

Something like the new Indiana Jones film would do the trick.




RE: BR needs a boost
By gigahertz20 on 3/28/2008 7:31:57 AM , Rating: 3
WHAT U TALKING BOUT martinrichards23!

Every film that comes out in a Blu-Ray format looks way better than the same title in DVD format. You don't need to be a geek to notice the difference, just a pair of eyes.

BR will be a success as time goes on, players will get cheaper, BR burners will get faster and cheaper, media will get cheaper. It's just going to take awhile like it did for DVD, everybody has their money tied up in DVD players and racks of DVD movies in their living rooms. It will take time for people to eventually switch over just like it did for VHS to DVD. 6 years from now, DVD will be VHS.


RE: BR needs a boost
By 777 on 3/28/2008 7:50:38 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
It will take time for people to eventually switch over just like it did for VHS to DVD. 6 years from now, DVD will be VHS.


Great point! Nobody seems to remember when VHS came out those crappy decks cost $300 - $400.00 and this was way back in the mid 1980's, heaven forbid in beginning of Blu-ray one would have to pay $400.00. Toshiba had dirt cheap prices because it was trying to win the war and was loosing a bundle selling their hardware at those lowball prices.

quote:
Every film that comes out in a Blu-Ray format looks way better than the same title in DVD format.


I guess some people have never seen a DVD on a 50in LCD, it looks terrible! In fact most high def monitors don't play anything standard def that looks good. Sure on a 27" glass tube DVD looks pretty good, but not on these new Hi-def LCD's.


RE: BR needs a boost
By theapparition on 3/28/2008 8:16:59 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Nobody seems to remember when VHS came out those crappy decks cost $300 - $400.00 and this was way back in the mid 1980's

I remember my first VCR. JVC front load (not that crappy top load style). Price family paid for it......$1200 (1980?). Quite a bit more than your numbers, not adjusted for inflation.
I reminded myself that when I paid close to 1k for my first BR player.


RE: BR needs a boost
By martinrichards23 on 3/28/2008 8:52:22 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
I guess some people have never seen a DVD on a 50in LCD, it looks terrible! In fact most high def monitors don't play anything standard def that looks good. Sure on a 27" glass tube DVD looks pretty good, but not on these new Hi-def LCD's.


Exactly, but a lot of people are still using their old CRT tv, and will eventually upgrade to a 32" LCD, they will never care what it looks like on 50".


RE: BR needs a boost
By walk2k on 3/28/2008 1:12:28 PM , Rating: 2
Actually studies show the majority of HD sets sold are between 50-59" (27%. The next most popular size is 40-49" (27%), then your 30-39" at 23%.

And those are 2006 figures, no doubt the trend is towards larger sizes.


RE: BR needs a boost
By CorrND on 3/28/2008 1:46:25 PM , Rating: 2
Do you have a source for these stats? Seems hard to believe.


RE: BR needs a boost
By martinrichards23 on 3/28/2008 1:54:01 PM , Rating: 2
I just don't believe that, certainly not in the UK anyway. Many shops don't even stock them that big, 32" is definitely the standard, 42" would be considered large, and 50" extremely large.

Shops stock far more 26/27" ones than 42".


RE: BR needs a boost
By Hiawa23 on 3/28/2008 9:27:50 AM , Rating: 3
I only bought an HDTV for my PS3 & Xbox 360 gaming, & really fine with standard DVDs, but bought the HD DVD player for Transformers, & other than gaming I really don't need HD for TV & movies. I think the way the economy is & most families here in the states not even owning an HDTV, I expect Blu ray to pickup slowly, but thanks to the PS3, should continue to move alot of players. I just think with every thing that most of American families have to deal with, financially, HD movies are at the bottom of the priorities list.


RE: BR needs a boost
By Pryde on 3/28/2008 7:55:26 AM , Rating: 1
High Def looks a lot better on a true 1080p (1920x1200 Full HD). Problem is that most HDTVs sold are only 720p (1366x768 HD Ready). Normal TVs only have 576p (720×576)

Full HD has 5x the amount of pixel over standard 576p
HD Ready only has about 2.5x as many Pixels over 576p

As the size of the TV gets larger the difference really makes a huge improvement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_telev...


RE: BR needs a boost
By Pryde on 3/28/2008 7:57:51 AM , Rating: 2
Can't see a edit button

1080p is 1920x1080


RE: BR needs a boost
By 777 on 3/28/2008 7:58:28 AM , Rating: 2
Agreed!


RE: BR needs a boost
By theapparition on 3/28/2008 8:27:22 AM , Rating: 2
I disagree with your terms.

Full HD (in the US) is either 1080p, 1080i, or 720p as defined by the ATSC standard. Although, for most arguments, we purist would like to consider 1080p as being "Full HD".

You are correct that most TV's sold are 720p, usually 1366x768 (LCD) or 1024x768 (Plasma) resolution, but that has nothing to do with HD "ready". HD ready means that the TV does not come with a built in tuner.....implies nothing on the resolution capability. A TV that is HD ready will should be able to display a processed HD signal, that's all.

PAL (EU) runs at 576i (not 576p) and NTSC (US) runs at 480i (technically 525 lines, of which 480 are visible).

I agree with the intent of your post, just wanted to correct some details.


RE: BR needs a boost
By 16nm on 3/28/2008 9:53:32 AM , Rating: 1
Full HD is 1080p which is 50% more resolution than 720p which is 50% more resolution than DVD (480p)

720p is just HD, not "Full HD"

It's silly, I know, but that's where we stand today.

I find it's less confusing to see it as:

1080p HD (High)
720p MD (Medium)
480p SD (Standard)


RE: BR needs a boost
By Murst on 3/28/2008 10:39:54 AM , Rating: 2
The difference between the resolutions is much greater than 50%. You have to remember that resolution is width * height...

Arguing what's "Full HD" vs "HD" is just silly. "Full HD" is just a stupid marketing term. Since only 1080p TVs are currently being marketed as "Full HD", however, I think its reasonable to assume that when someone says "Full HD", they are refering to 1080p.


RE: BR needs a boost
By 16nm on 3/28/2008 11:25:44 AM , Rating: 2
That's very true. There are 50% greater horizontal lines but total number of pixels are even greater than that. This only applies to LCD screens, of course.


RE: BR needs a boost
By theapparition on 3/28/2008 12:50:18 PM , Rating: 2
Are you argreeing or disagreeing with me? Not sure.

I stated that as defined by the ATSC spec, there is no such thing as full HD, there is only HD.


RE: BR needs a boost
By 16nm on 3/28/2008 7:37:31 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Are you argreeing or disagreeing with me?


Neither agreeing or disagreeing.


RE: BR needs a boost
By walk2k on 3/28/2008 1:14:36 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe 2 years ago most HDTVs were 720p but today you can barely find a 720p set in the store unless you are talking 30" or less.


RE: BR needs a boost
By walk2k on 3/28/2008 1:16:57 PM , Rating: 2
Well, maybe under 40" that is. Once you get over about 42" 1080p sets dominate the showroom.


RE: BR needs a boost