Print 42 comment(s) - last by typo101.. on Jul 3 at 6:28 PM

Matt Weigman has joined the ranks of famous hackers to fall into the hands of law enforcement and serve hard time. Legally blind, Mr. Weigman carried out a long campaign of phone attacks from age 14 to 19 that earned him 11 years in prison.  (Source: Wired)
Blind phone hacker's reign comes to a close

On June 12, 2006, SWAT police stormed a house in Alvarado, Texas.  They had received a call from what appeared to be the phone number, from an individual who reported that he was holding hostages and had killed family members with an AK47 while high on hallucinogenic drugs.  The operation, which likely cost the state tens of thousands of dollars, came up empty handed -- there were no hostages and no gunman -- merely scared and confused victims.  Miles away, Guadalupe Martinez, a "swatter" -- a phone hacker that spoofs the 911 system with malicious calls -- was laughing.

Many regard phone hacking as a dead pastime, believing it vanished in the 1980s.  However, it is alive and well in some parts of the country, with a younger generation of phone hacker's (known as "phreakers") wreaking havoc.  The latest case is that of a 19-year-old blind phone hacker in the Boston area who went on a similar spree of phone crimes and harassment, which earned him 11 years in prison.

Matthew Weigman, also known as "Li'l Hacker", is legally blind, but that didn't stop him from joining up with a crew of phone hackers and placing hundreds of harassing calls via the 911 system and other phone systems.  The crimes began when Mr. Weigman was only 14, and continued until this year.

Targeting "employers, landlords, families and friends of multiple party line participants" with zeal, Mr. Weigman showed his victims little mercy.  He and his friends would cut phone lines, snoop on conversations, and send police to his enemies' houses in a concerted attempt to get them fired or evicted. 

He and his friends used a variety of classic phone-hacking schemes.  Among them was "pretexting" calls -- calls to phone company workers where the group would pose as employees or customers in an effort to gain useful information.  Mr. Weigman's phreaker friends would also use war-dialing -- auto-dialing thousands of numbers to try to gain access to the phone system.  They would then meet up and trade passwords and intelligence.

Police first caught wind of Mr. Weigman in 2005 when he called officers to the home of Richard Gasper, a TSA screener, whose daughter Mr. Weigman knew personally.  Mr. Gasper's daughter had refused to participate in phone sex with Mr. Weigman, so he responded with the malicious hoax.

In May 2008 Weigman, his brother and another swatter named Sean Benton, according to the U.S. Department of Justice, drove 70 miles to the house of a Verizon Wireless employee who was investigating the incidents.  They tried to "intimidate and frighten him".  Believing he was above the law, Mr. Weigman saw his unsavory dreams come crashing down; in this case the police showed up and he was arrested.

After a lengthy review and trial, three of his friends -- Stuart Rosoff, Jason Trowbridge and Chad Ward -- earned sentences of five years each.  Guadalupe Martinez, the aforementioned friend of the group, received 30 months.  Another phreaker, Carlton Nalley pled guilty, but failed to show up for sentencing.  And Mr. Weigman, the audacious 19-year-old blind phone hacker, earned the longest sentence of them all -- 11 years (135 months).  The sentence is one of the longest to date and brings to an end this crime saga, serving as a warning to other would-be phone hackers of the risk they are taking.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Good riddance
By tastyratz on 6/30/2009 9:25:58 AM , Rating: 4
He gives all of us a bad name with his general unfunny mischief. Not all people who hack are bad.

Since hes blind I guess he just wont see bubba coming while hes in jail.

I'm glad they got him.

RE: Good riddance
By Brandon Hill on 6/30/2009 9:36:32 AM , Rating: 3
Why is it that we always wish that a criminal is "taken" by Bubba in jail? It never fails that the comment will pop up when someone is sent to the slammmer.

RE: Good riddance
By tastyratz on 6/30/2009 9:43:09 AM , Rating: 2
Because jail these days is practically a government paid vacation.
Lots of people locked up couldn't get access to the amenities they have in jail on the outside. If he is in the slammer surfing the web and not missing an episode of Judge Judy, then there has to be SOME part about jail that still sucks...

RE: Good riddance
By MozeeToby on 6/30/2009 10:58:28 AM , Rating: 5
Right, because getting raped every night for 11 years is a fair a just punishment for his behavior. If another country sentenced its citizens to be raped as punishment for crime we would (rightfully) decry the human rights violation.

RE: Good riddance
By invidious on 6/30/09, Rating: 0
RE: Good riddance
By adiposity on 6/30/2009 1:31:44 PM , Rating: 5
I'm sure you'll apply the same argument to yourself when you are gnashing your teeth over the cap-and-trade system, or the govt. health care bill.


RE: Good riddance
By Samus on 6/30/2009 7:42:37 PM , Rating: 2
Brandon, seek out and watch a movie called "Lets Go To Prison" its by the same crew that did "Waiting" minus Dane Cook so if you liked that awkward comedy, you'll love 'prison'.

It's a good 'date' flic too. You can probably find the xvid on piratesbay, at least until August, because its a tough movie to find in hardcopy (although netflix has it)

RE: Good riddance
By MatthiasF on 6/30/2009 12:25:44 PM , Rating: 2
Did you read the article? Five years of torturing other people, and harassing a woman who wouldn't have (phone) sex with him. He then went out of his way to try to intimidate someone helping the investigation against him.

This guy deserved 11 years and let's be honest, it won't be every night. The novelty will wear off and new meat will arrive. It'll only be the first year or two that'll be a pain in the a...oh.

RE: Good riddance
By adiposity on 6/30/2009 1:19:29 PM , Rating: 2
This guy deserved 11 years and let's be honest, it won't be every night.

Apparently you mean, he deserved 11 years AND to be raped a few times. If rape is really a justified punishment, and apparently a lot of people on here think it is, then why don't we make it legal?

Or is your position that the weak or good looking criminals should get a disproportionate amount of raping? Or that the big thugs in prison should develop a taste for raping, so they can be be productive members of society when they get out?

Advocating prison rape seems extremely short-sighted to me. Do you really want to institutionalize rape? Or is it just pleasing to you to think of someone you don't like getting raped, even though technically it isn't allowed? Does it bother you at all that someone who may be innocent of a crime they are arrested for might be easily raped in this system you advocate? Does it bother you that a person who had a few pounds of pot with them might get raped while in prison?

Or is all crime the same to you? Any crime that can result in prison is deserving of the possibility of rape? Wow, what a nuanced position.


RE: Good riddance
By HakonPCA on 6/30/09, Rating: -1
RE: Good riddance
By adiposity on 6/30/2009 1:52:17 PM , Rating: 2
I guess so, since I don't detect anything sarcastic about his response. More like gloating.


RE: Good riddance
By MatthiasF on 6/30/2009 7:03:29 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe it was a sarcastic gloat?

Anyway, the guy's blind. You really think they put blind people in with the general population at a prison? He'll be at some minimum security facility with a setup for the visually impaired.

The real irony is that this facility probably has better televisions, even though no one can see them.

RE: Good riddance
By PrimarchLion on 6/30/2009 6:43:34 PM , Rating: 3
I agree with you, but I think it should only be legal in self defense.


RE: Good riddance
By ClownPuncher on 6/30/2009 12:41:32 PM , Rating: 4
Jail is not like vacation in any way, please stop talking like you know anything about it, other than what you watched on tv.

Advocating rape as punishment screams maladjustment.

RE: Good riddance
By typo101 on 7/3/2009 6:28:37 PM , Rating: 2
You know you have a problem when somebody named ClownPuncher can call you maladjusted AND have a point.

RE: Good riddance
By SlipDizzy on 6/30/2009 9:46:59 AM , Rating: 4
Going to prison for 11 years would be terrible, but going to prison for 11 years and being "taken" every night would be much worse. Also, I assume the media has burned the image of prison rape into all of our minds. Personally, the thought of prison isn't what scares me, its the thought of the "man-on-man" interaction that keeps me away from committing crimes.

RE: Good riddance
By mattclary on 6/30/2009 10:00:09 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly. +++

RE: Good riddance
By Brandon Hill on 6/30/2009 10:22:50 AM , Rating: 2
Or maybe you've seen one too many episodes of Oz :)

RE: Good riddance
By SlipDizzy on 6/30/2009 11:53:00 AM , Rating: 4
Actually I've never watched OZ. However, I have watched Shawshank Redemption about 50 times.

RE: Good riddance
By threepac3 on 6/30/2009 12:43:36 PM , Rating: 2
Or American History X... sends shivers down my spine.

RE: Good riddance
By grandpope on 6/30/2009 11:55:34 AM , Rating: 3
One is "one too many".

RE: Good riddance
By VoodooChicken on 6/30/2009 9:49:34 AM , Rating: 3
Bubba don't play that. Bubba is a good boy that was the victim of circumcision evidencs. Bubba was at the wrong places at the wrong time. Don't mess with the Bubba and the Bubba don't mess wit you.

RE: Good riddance
By userengel on 6/30/2009 10:38:52 AM , Rating: 1
ubba is a good boy that was the victim of circumcision evidencs.

I think you mean circumstantial... at least I hope you do.

RE: Good riddance
By mindless1 on 6/30/2009 6:16:59 PM , Rating: 2
I would refrain from using the word "we", it's usually only pathetic losers who think like that, trying to blame society, and by extension any individual in that society who did something that didn't effect the commenter one single bit, for their miserable lives.

RE: Good riddance
By ggordonliddy on 6/30/2009 6:32:10 PM , Rating: 2
I'm Bubba and I resemble that remark.

RE: Good riddance
By HomerTNachoCheese on 6/30/2009 11:34:12 AM , Rating: 2
Why Bubba? Everyone always forgets about Tiny.

RE: Good riddance
By EasyC on 6/30/2009 12:33:45 PM , Rating: 2
The term "hacking" has become so loosely defined over the years. A majority of people who consider themselves "hackers" do nothing more than pirate software/music or follow tutorials and copy scripts to bring down legacy web sites.

While this kid DID use social engineering (one of the components of REAL hacking), it sounds like him and his buddies got the latest copy of the Anarchists Cookbook and went on a spree of prank calls using fake numbers. Kids have been making prank calls to 911 for years. Hell people make stupid calls to 911 that aren't pranks and waste the governments money. I heard about a woman who called the police because McDonalds wouldn't give her the sandwich she wanted.

Granted this kid did alot more than just a couple prank calls and cut a couple phone lines, I hardly consider it worthy of 11 years of rape as you so... elloquently iterated.

RE: Good riddance
By michaelklachko on 6/30/2009 2:40:54 PM , Rating: 1
Not the case here. He was called "one of the best phone hackers alive " by Kevin Poulsen:

I think that a year or maximum two in jail would be more appropriate punishment for this kid. After all, what he did is a harassment, not even sexual. If you rape or badly physically hurt someone you are likely to get way less than 11 years, even after a second offense.

RE: Good riddance
By jlips6 on 6/30/2009 10:03:18 PM , Rating: 2
yeah, those weren't really shenanigans at all

Pun intended?
By sdegroft on 6/30/2009 9:29:19 AM , Rating: 4
Mr. Weigman saw his unsavory dreams come crashing down

Did anyone else see the humor in this statement?

RE: Pun intended?
By HomerTNachoCheese on 6/30/2009 11:37:59 AM , Rating: 2
I hear ya!

editor needed much?
By smackababy on 6/30/2009 9:31:06 AM , Rating: 4
Police first caught wind of Mr. Weigman in 2005 when he sent police to the home of home of Richard Gasper, a TSA screener, whose daughter Mr. Weigman personally.
What does that even mean?

Just a suggestion for all who write anything: please read over your work before publishing it. You can catch a lot of simple errors if you do.

with zeel
By mattclary on 6/30/2009 9:49:57 AM , Rating: 3

Operational cost is BS
By ggordonliddy on 6/30/2009 6:35:25 PM , Rating: 2
The operation, which likely cost the state tens of thousands of dollars

I'm sick of these reports saying that government operations cost X amount of money. As if the employees aren't getting paid if the operation doesn't occur?

Minimum security prison?
By Alexvrb on 7/1/2009 10:12:29 PM , Rating: 2
If he escapes from prison, I'm gonna laugh my butt off!

well, look at the bright side
By Totally on 6/30/2009 10:01:43 AM , Rating: 1
for everyone we lock up, a pedo is released...oh wait.

By Beenthere on 6/30/2009 1:55:25 PM , Rating: 1
Dumb and Dumber describes this fool. Maybe he can get a cell with the Pirate Bay owners? What goes around comes around.

By msfreeh on 6/30/09, Rating: -1
By NARC4457 on 6/30/2009 9:58:36 AM , Rating: 2
And this is related to the article, how?

By MrPoletski on 6/30/2009 11:46:41 AM , Rating: 2
The article mentions phreaks...

By invidious on 6/30/2009 12:17:26 PM , Rating: 2
Perhaps he believes that because the law enforcement is made up of imperfect humans, that gives anyone free reign to disregard the law and prey on the innocent. Such a person would see this article and its implications as an attack on that belief and they would try to justify themself.

Or maybe they just like to post random links as they troll our forum.

By rippleyaliens on 6/30/2009 6:45:17 PM , Rating: 2
Getting Raped in prison doesnt happen as much as ya think.. BUT this guy sounds like either a fat guy, or some skinny terd. HE will be someones BIATCH.. He will be raped, or worse, depending on his SMILE, GET IT>>... IF he goes to a medium security prison, and with that sentence he prob will.. HE will have a very RUDE awakening comming. If he is black, then he best get with the black gangs, whites- white gangs, hispanic, etc.... Either way, for making stupid phone calls, he is in a world of hurt. He is definetly gonna get beat up, BADLY.. (Fresh Fish)... Prob raped.. AND if he ops for protected housing, then he has 11 years, of being in a cell 23hrs a day, solo.. Horrible food.. Yah he can watch TV, but that is about it. No movies, it will be 11 years till he can shower solo... Sounds like a nerdly guy, so, he is indeed a walking target..

Even Charles Manson got beat up, and almost killed in prison, even in the protected wing.. This guy is in for a world of hurt...

"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles
The Growing Epidemic of Child Hackers
June 2, 2008, 10:14 PM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki