backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 104 comment(s) - last by AlphaVirus.. on Apr 25 at 1:51 PM


  (Source: Rockstar Games)
Lawmaker calls for free, family-friendly wireless internet access open to the public; another auction required

With the internet littered with foul, explicit material, parents worry more and more about their children finding out what the internet fully has to offer. The solution, proposed by Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-CA), is to open up spectrum.

Eshoo proposed a new act on Monday, dubbed the Wireless Internet Nationwide for Families Act, instructing the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to auction off 2155-2175MHz band of spectrum.

The winner of the auction of is required to use the spectrum to create free, nationwide wireless internet service that blocks all pornographic websites. It would be a service targeted directly towards families.  Eshoo hopes the auctioning of the spectrum would attract types of national broadband service providers.

"The cost of broadband service is a barrier for too many families who want broadband, with more than 100 million Americans without broadband at home," Eshoo said. "The results of the 700 MHz auction disappointed many of us who hoped that a new entrant would emerge. 70% of the spectrum auctioned went to only two carriers. While the auction required under this legislation is open to anyone, it is my hope that the bold conditions of requiring free, family friendly service will encourage the entry of a new kind of national broadband service provider."

The two carriers Eshoo speaks of are Verizon and AT&T, already top-tier broadband carriers in the U.S.

The question is whether other service providers will take to this new plan. One company has already stepped up, adopting the idea years ago. M2Z Networks offered to pick up white space in order to provide free, family-friendly public wireless internet. It was turned down in 2006, but with Eshoo reigniting the fire, M2Z may very well get it wants. Since the space will be auctioned, the network company will have to put up quite a mean fight first.

If the act is passed, the winner of the auction would have ten years to provide coverage to at least 95% of the U.S. No information has been released concerning possibly auction dates.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I see a rash of tinyurls
By JasonMick (blog) on 4/22/2008 3:08:49 PM , Rating: 5
Okay either that or some other "work around". Blocking attempts seem so silly to me. What is this China?? And in all honesty porn sites are probably less damaging to children these days than myspace/facebook/aim/blogs etc. Lets face it-- if you let your kids wantonly explore the dark recesses of the internet unsupervised (dateline nbc anyone?), you're a pretty crappy parent, and you're kids are pretty screwed offline or not. A filter is not going to give children what they really need-- a parent with interest and parenting skills.

Sheesh silly censors.




RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By FITCamaro on 4/22/2008 3:27:41 PM , Rating: 5
Hell you can walk into any book store if you want porn. Ever seen some of those books in the relationship aisle? Many show full nude shots, in detail, of sexual positions and even tips on chicks sucking d*** and how to enjoy anal (Sorry me and the gf were in there last night laughing at some of the topics of the books. Her idea.).

Your local Barnes & Noble offers free uncensored access far easier than the internet. And for free. Hell you even get some education into the subject if you want. Now to go buy that leather whip and some handcuffs...


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By JoshuaBuss on 4/22/2008 3:40:59 PM , Rating: 2
Man, you're so right.. I'm also surprised by what you can find in an average innocent bookstore.

For the curious developing child, it's a landmine of pornography and explicit instruction on how to enjoy oneself sexually...

and as someone else mentioned, they'll have to block wikipedia.. it's chock-full of adult material too.


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By Ryanman on 4/23/2008 3:18:42 PM , Rating: 2
pff. As a "curious, developing child" I wish I had received more explicit instruction on how to use a condom and enjoy myself with the GF instead of moralizing speeches from my sex ed teacher.
There's no way for me to prove it of course... but curiosity DID kill the kat. Maybe less censorship is the better way to go, considering how hard it is to control like you and Fit said. You can block the internet, but you can't put blinders on kids.

Although I have seen a couple on leashes : /


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By kmmatney on 4/22/2008 3:49:43 PM , Rating: 2
Yes but how many 7 year kids are going to go into a bookstore and search that out. By contrast, a 7 year old can easily do a google image search in about 2 seconds on the home computer. Nude shots are no big deal, I could care less if my kids saw that, but some of the other stuff...


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By FITCamaro on 4/22/2008 3:59:24 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
but some of the other stuff...


Mexican midgets getting banged by a dog while sucking off a donkey?


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By EntreHoras on 4/22/2008 4:09:31 PM , Rating: 2
Come on!!

How can I get that image out of my head now??


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By FITCamaro on 4/22/2008 4:23:22 PM , Rating: 2
Go watch normal porn.


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By ImSpartacus on 4/22/2008 6:35:25 PM , Rating: 3
Oh damn it, it's blacked!


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By Some1ne on 4/22/2008 5:17:00 PM , Rating: 5
"And when the woman has four penises in her at the same time, then stands over the men and pees on them, is that part of being in love too? Five midgets, spanking a man...covered in Thousand Island dressing. Is that making love?"


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By Crassus on 4/22/2008 9:53:57 PM , Rating: 2
Depends on how much you're into Thousand Island dressing. I'd prefer French ;)


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By timmiser on 4/23/2008 1:17:11 AM , Rating: 2
That is what I would call, "Advanced love making".


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By Omega215D on 4/23/2008 4:15:16 AM , Rating: 2
"Advanced Love Making" would be the Kama Sutra... which is available in many stores =D


By TomCorelis (blog) on 4/22/2008 4:28:13 PM , Rating: 2
What about the romance novel section? Some of those books should require an ID to purchase... but they don't. And to think us dudes have to sheepishly peek behind black covers while our wives and girlfriends freely read the romance section.

Hell, why don't we just card people for Song of Songs in the Bible too?


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By Ringold on 4/22/2008 8:04:06 PM , Rating: 2
If no one else dares defend cesnorship of porn.. I guess I will, in this instance.

Am I the only one that thought it might not be a bad business idea to help be able to afford a low-cost service when such a large portion of bandwidth gets consumed by porn? It could be a possible cost-saving measure.

The constitutional issue I don't see if private enterprise is providing it, though I can understand the fear.


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By BarkHumbug on 4/23/2008 5:33:21 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
when such a large portion of bandwidth gets consumed by porn?


Do you have proof of this or is it an assumption? I thought it was consumed by illegal P2P downloads as proclaimed by others?

It seems the "large portion of bandwidth"-card is played quite often when it comes to defending throttling/banning/etc of "frowned-upon" internet traffic.

Example: I don't like pictures of cute babies, it would be beneficial to ALL of the internet if they were banned as they "consume such large portion of bandwidth".


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By Ringold on 4/23/2008 11:33:47 AM , Rating: 2
I don't know how much bandwidth is consumed exactly, but it's fairly common knowledge a huge portion of websites out there are pornographic, and I assume they are getting accessed. :)

I don't see a problem, however, throttling a low-cost service, even if they try to block P2P. We're talking about a low cost plan for the poor. I pay $45 or so for my cable connection, and for it I have vastly different expectations of service. For a low cost plan, and a more expensive one, I expect consumers to get what they pay for. Pay little, get little.


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By BarkHumbug on 4/24/2008 9:54:45 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
it's fairly common knowledge a huge portion of websites out there are pornographic, and I assume they are getting accessed. :)

Yes, but I am assuming they are accessed for a brief period of time, at least if you're young, so I still don't buy the "large portion of bandwidth" argument. If the aim was to target large bandwidth-consumers just ban P2P, or streaming media services for that matter.

quote:
I pay $45 or so for my cable connection, and for it I have vastly different expectations of service.

Unless you have Comcast apparently, then you don't know what to expect. ;)

quote:
I expect consumers to get what they pay for. Pay little, get little.

Or in this case, pay nothing, get no porn.

Don't worry, I get it, it's a proposal to shelter the children from the dark side of the web. I guess they could name it "Decent Family Internet", and don't you get caught by your neighbors using anything else because we all know the only reason you pay for internet is...


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By whynot on 4/23/2008 12:03:37 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think it is a bad idea for a company to provide internet access that automatically blocks porn. If the market demands it. The problem is this is not a market based solution, it is imposed on by the government in exchange for a slice of radio spectrum.


RE: I see a rash of tinyurls
By arielshai on 4/24/2008 2:28:12 PM , Rating: 2
ummmm - proxy sites duuuuuuu!


Call me crazy