backtop


Print 13 comment(s) - last by xmichaelx.. on Dec 2 at 4:58 PM

Libraries in the United States are going to receive $3.4M in funding to help accelerate broadband support

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation plans to provide $3.4 million in grants to help libraries across the United States upgrade their internet access to include broadband and wireless support.

According to the American Library Association, 60% of U.S. libraries report having "insufficient" broadband speeds, but libraries are currently being underfunded.

Arkansas, Massachusetts, Kansas, New York, and Virginia were given funds ranging from $367,789 to $977,468 to develop better broadband internet connections throughout the states.  Furthermore, 14 more states are going to work with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to help libraries work to secure stimulus funding.

"Federal, state, and local government investments in connecting libraries to broadband are important steps toward realizing the vision of universal broadband access," said Jill Nishi, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Director of U.S. Libraries, in a statement.  "When libraries have access to broadband, they can effectively deliver critical educational, employment, and government services for residents that lack Internet access elsewhere. As community anchor institutions, libraries can also help drive local broadband adoption."

Despite wider adoption of broadband, almost 40% of Americans today still don't have cable or DSL support in their homes.  In 70% of these communities, a local public library is the only facility that offers broadband internet for free.

Since leaving as the head of Microsoft, Bill Gates has pledged more time and energy into his organization.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Good!
By jvillaro on 12/1/2009 1:30:54 PM , Rating: 5
Somebody is going to find something bad to say about this news, but in the meantime...
Good job, keep it up and thanks!




RE: Good!
By Jephph on 12/1/09, Rating: 0
RE: Good!
By Yawgm0th on 12/1/2009 2:01:09 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
something bad to say about this news
Obviously there are better causes than those libraries' uselessly slow Internet connections. Aren't there homeless kittens somewhere that need money?

Think of the kittens, Bill. Think of the kittens.


RE: Good!
By Shig on 12/1/2009 3:24:54 PM , Rating: 3
I agree, very good.

But one has to wonder why Libraries don't put much larger portions of their budget towards internet access. There isn't much in print that isn't online anymore.

I'd like to see the FCC step up and make broadband required for libraries. One step at a time I spose.


RE: Good!
By AEvangel on 12/1/2009 4:02:35 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
I'd like to see the FCC step up and make broadband required for libraries. One step at a time I spose.


Yeah cause more Govt is the answer to any problem....

/sarcasm


RE: Good!
By phatboye on 12/1/2009 4:21:02 PM , Rating: 3
considering most libraries are ran by the public sector (government) I don't understand the point you are trying to make AEvangel.


RE: Good!
By xmichaelx on 12/2/2009 4:58:26 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
But one has to wonder why Libraries don't put much larger portions of their budget towards internet access.

Most libraries have already gone this way, but massive budget cuts in the face of the recession have really taken a toll. It doesn't help that the cost of subscriptions to scholarly databases rises at about 10% per year. This impacts academic libraries more than public libraries, but the public ones have similar (and additional) problems.

quote:
There isn't much in print that isn't online anymore.

If you go to the library to read the newspaper, this is true. If you go to read books or do any serious research online, you're looking at substantial (annually rising)subscription fees for the online version.


libraries and windows OS
By aapocketz on 12/1/2009 1:57:02 PM , Rating: 2
Kinda diverting a bit, but when I read this it made me think. Whenever I go into a library there is always a bunch of PCs running windows, that are usually locked down somehow to basically just run IE and point to the web or to the library catalog. Do they get some deal with microsoft to have windows on there? Or is it a legacy thing, since IE has such market share? Seems like a perfect situation to be running linux and firefox or other browser. Much cheaper to buy and maintain, and very easy to lock down and secure. In fact a thin client solution may be the cheapest and easiest to maintain solution.

I would love to walk into a library and check out a ebook reader and also be able to browse the catalog for physical books as I walk around.




RE: libraries and windows OS
By Oregonian2 on 12/1/2009 2:16:23 PM , Rating: 2
Our library which is heavily computerized has it's catalogs available online (along with the rest of the county's). So it needs to support IE anyway for obvious reasons. So if support for IE is mandatory anyway, why add the additional cost for "free" other options?


RE: libraries and windows OS
By dlapine on 12/1/2009 3:19:25 PM , Rating: 4
Our local library in central Illinois has gotten funds from the Gates foundation twice for the purchase of a few PC's. The first time, back in 2002, the funds had to be used for Windows PC's. This time around, it was matching funds for whatever PC's the libraries wanted. They are getting better at this. The support for faster networking is a good idea.

As for our library, we have 2 Linux boxes used only for the catalog searches and half a dozen PC's for general purpose internet use, and some old Macs for the kids. We push Firefox as the default browser and have a variety of non-Microsoft software (OpenOffice, Foxit, etc) on those machines as we have a lot fewer issues that way.

As for why we don't just put linux on the box and be done with it, well, it's a lot easier to lock down a Windows box with the free SteadyState software from Microsoft than it is to lock down a generic Linux PC. I know, because I've tried both, and I've been running Linux servers and clusters since 1998. While there might be some cool Linux distro out there that comes pre-locked, I haven't found it yet.

Since the catalogs are available online, our patrons can bring a laptop and use our wireless if they want to walk around and browse.


RE: libraries and windows OS
By stmok on 12/2/2009 1:09:57 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
As for why we don't just put linux on the box and be done with it, well, it's a lot easier to lock down a Windows box with the free SteadyState software from Microsoft than it is to lock down a generic Linux PC. I know, because I've tried both, and I've been running Linux servers and clusters since 1998. While there might be some cool Linux distro out there that comes pre-locked, I haven't found it yet.


Fedora has a kiosk mode called xguest. Its not that hard to implement. Only allows Firefox to run.
=> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/selinux-user-guide/f...

...I use it at our local library, employment/careers office, church and computer access for the underprivileged.


RE: libraries and windows OS
By nafhan on 12/1/2009 3:26:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Seems like a perfect situation to be running linux and firefox or other browser. Much cheaper to buy and maintain, and very easy to lock down and secure.
It certainly does seem like a good idea. However, they probably just buy the cheapest PC they can, and often the cheapest new PC you can buy is loaded with some version of Windows.
Maintenance probably boils down to occasionally installing patches/updates. It's likely that a thin client or Linux PC probably would save little or no money at all, especially if the IT guy doesn't feel like learning or dealing with an alternative OS.


Very thoughtful !
By Beenthere on 12/1/09, Rating: -1
"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki