backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 120 comment(s) - last by whynot.. on Apr 23 at 1:35 AM

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer reflects on Windows Vista

Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system has been on the market for consumers for a little over a year now. During that time, the operating system has seen its fair share of both praise and criticism.

As is customary with Windows operating systems that have been on the market for roughly a year, Microsoft recently released the first Service Pack for Vista. Service Pack 1 (SP1) addressed a number of shortcomings with the operating system and rolled in a number of hotfixes and patches that have been released via Windows Update over the past year.

Now that Vista has had some time to establish itself in the marketplace and receive a fresh boost of energy with SP1, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is now reflecting on the operating system.

"Windows Vista: A work in progress," said Ballmer to a crowd of Microsoft MVPs in Seattle. "A very important piece of work, and I think we did a lot of things right, and I think we have a lot of things we need to learn from. Certainly, you never want to let five years go between releases. Can we just sort of kiss that stone and move on?"

Ballmer went on to add, "It turns out many things become problematic when you have those long release cycles. The design point, what you should be targeting. We can't ever let that happen again."

Ballmer also noted that there are plenty of happy customers of the Windows Vista operating system as well as Windows XP. He remarked that he has received emails from staunch supporters of the Windows XP operating system, but declined to give any indications that Microsoft would go any further than its intention to provide Windows XP Home to ultra-low-cost PCs (ULPCs) until June 2010.

Windows Vista has been in the news quite frequently in the past few weeks. A week ago, David Cross, a product manager responsible for designing Vista's User Account Control (UAC) exclaimed that Microsoft designed the feature to "annoy users".

More recently, Microsoft's Eric Ligman went off on a rant over the inference that Microsoft purposely included a loophole in Vista to allow consumers and businesses to install a full version of the operating system with an upgrade disc.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Aren't they all though??
By SpaceRanger on 4/18/2008 1:12:43 PM , Rating: 5
Most software projects whether it be OS or Application, are "works in progress". Rarely do you see OS projects die off after 1+ years...




RE: Aren't they all though??
By SectionEight on 4/18/2008 1:23:49 PM , Rating: 2
MS Paint and calculator are probably the only programs that haven't been updated in a long time. Those and software that isn't being supported/is superceded by new programs/maker is defunct. Even games now are WIPs with bugfixes and new content in patches.

While I like some WIPs (I like my OS and games to work), some are just a pain; Acrobat Reader has become too bloated for what I need it for (I am aware of 3rd-party readers).


RE: Aren't they all though??
By masher2 (blog) on 4/18/2008 1:26:25 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, I believe Paint was updated with XP SP2, just 3-4 years ago :)


RE: Aren't they all though??
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 4/18/2008 1:36:22 PM , Rating: 4
There are still people who don't use Paint.NET? :)


RE: Aren't they all though??
By oab on 4/18/2008 4:26:21 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, people who only use paint to take screenshots and don't do any "real" image manipulation.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By darkpaw on 4/18/2008 4:42:36 PM , Rating: 2
Yup, I actually still use MSpaint for just this purpose. Works great for quick screen pastes.

For any manipulation I use GIMP for windows.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By Hare on 4/19/2008 4:11:27 AM , Rating: 2
irfanview FTW :)

Launches in 0.01sec, can do wonders + batch runs.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By omnicronx on 4/18/2008 7:14:38 PM , Rating: 2
Paint.Net is a great tool :)
I like it almost as much as the gimp (on nix that is)


RE: Aren't they all though??
By SectionEight on 4/18/2008 1:49:17 PM , Rating: 2
That may be true, but they didn't make it into some monstrosity that loads itself in the background at startup yet takes 30 seconds to open, checks for updates every 20 minutes, and uses 2 GB of disk space. That is why I still use it for the majority of my quick photo editing.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By Clauzii on 4/18/2008 3:34:27 PM , Rating: 2
What program are You referring too??

Photoshop CS on AMD XP2400+, 1GB RAM starts from 40 GB Maxtor in 20 sec. (5 sec. if it's closed and opened again). And it takes 200 MB on the HD. And updates can be disabled.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By wordsworm on 4/18/2008 9:16:57 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
That may be true, but they didn't make it into some monstrosity that loads itself in the background at startup yet takes 30 seconds to open
For fun, I timed how long it took paint.net to open. Result... 4 seconds. CS2 took about 8 seconds. In either case, I hardly call that a monstrosity. Neither of them prompt me for an update. So, maybe your version is different than mine... hard to say.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By Shining Arcanine on 4/19/2008 8:53:17 PM , Rating: 2
Are you hearing what you are saying? A 4 second startup time for a program is ages!

I have no clue how you can consider that to be acceptable.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By JoshuaBuss on 4/20/2008 7:18:47 PM , Rating: 2
are you hearing what you're saying?

you really get that annoyed at having to wait a few SECONDS? Really??

wow.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By Kougar on 4/18/2008 8:35:55 PM , Rating: 2
Vista updated MS Paint again. They took out a few steps, making it quicker for users to just open, paste, and save screenshots.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By eyebeeemmpawn on 4/18/2008 1:46:05 PM , Rating: 5
The Engineer's creed: If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By Clauzii on 4/18/2008 3:40:33 PM , Rating: 2
Give this man a six, please! :)


RE: Aren't they all though??
By homerdog on 4/18/2008 6:52:10 PM , Rating: 3
6


RE: Aren't they all though??
By darkpaw on 4/18/2008 6:00:24 PM , Rating: 4
OSX is a work in progress too, at each milestone pay Steve Jobs $129.00.


RE: Aren't they all though??
By 777 on 4/18/08, Rating: -1
RE: Aren't they all though??
By just4U on 4/18/2008 9:14:08 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah but you have to factor in the cost of the mac as well. In general I am sure you'd still save by splurging on the Ultimate Edition and comparable hardware.

(Not that I'd recommend Ultimate, Premium is fine)


RE: Aren't they all though??
By darkpaw on 4/18/2008 10:47:32 PM , Rating: 5
All the Vista haters seem obsessed with that $400 copy of Ultimate (retail), when Vista works just fine for $100 copy of Premium (OEM). Aren't options great? Oh yah, I forgot Apple fans prefer having their decisions made for them.