backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 169 comment(s) - last by FakeDetector.. on Feb 25 at 3:39 PM


"We [will] really ferret through how far we can dial it up, and what that means for customer experience and customer satisfaction." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
Microsoft plans to step up antipiracy measures to bolster Vista sales

Microsoft didn't seem to have any problems with forecasted sales projections for Windows Vista when analysts were abuzz at the end of 2006. In late November, IDC projected that over 90 million copies of Windows Vista would ship in 2007 -- far outpacing the 67 million copies of Windows XP shipped during its first year on the market.

Now after slow initial sales of Windows Vista, Microsoft is saying that the analysts were "overly aggressive" with their sales projections. According to PC Advisor, Vista sales are off 60% compared to the 2001 launch of Windows XP. Revenue is also down by 23% so far with Vista's launch.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer repeatedly suggested that piracy is the reason why Vista is coming up short in sales. As a result, Ballmer feels that Microsoft must step up its antipiracy efforts to protect Vista sales worldwide. The move to stave off increases in pirate activity will no doubt affect the everyday users of Microsoft's operating systems. "We [will] really ferret through how far we can dial it up, and what that means for customer experience and customer satisfaction," said Ballmer.

"Piracy reduction can be a source of Windows revenue growth, and I think we'll make some piracy improvements this year," Ballmer continued. "We will have strong growth in the Windows business in emerging markets: China, India, Brazil, Russia and many others. Those markets are very high in piracy."

Microsoft is no stranger to piracy and Bill Gates recently had a front row seat when boastful Romanian President Traian Basescu proclaimed that "[Piracy] set off the development of the IT industry in Romania... It helped Romanians improve their creative capacity in the IT industry, which has become famous around the world."

A senior attorney for Microsoft also estimates that over 33% of all Microsoft software available worldwide is pirated.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Price
By Mithan on 2/20/2007 10:34:53 AM , Rating: 5
Maybe they should try competing a bit more on price if they want to increase sales....




RE: Price
By DEredita on 2/20/2007 10:48:04 AM , Rating: 5
IF you order from online hardware/software vendors, such as newegg, the pricing is on par with that of XP. But, like I said - most users probably don't want to shell out the money, time, and effort to upgrade their current machines for Vista. It's too new, unproven, and to be honest - XP runs great and doesn't need nearly as much hardware as Vista does.


RE: Price
By StevoLincolnite on 2/20/2007 11:18:50 AM , Rating: 3
The hardware requirements aren't so bad, I'm running full Aero with a Pentium M 1.6ghz, 1gb of ram, And a Radeon 9700 Pro 64Mb graphics card, and the good thing? Still playing oblivion on medium quality @ 800x600
Vista seems to have allot more swapping to the disk than what windows XP does, But it doesn't seem to affect your productivity at all, Not like you would if you had XP running on 64Mb/128Mb of ram. I did a test I took out a 512Mb Sodimm stick out of my laptop, The load time into vista took significantly longer, But Using Office 2007 and Vista in general didn't change, it was still responsive and performed great, I think that may be partly to the 3D accelerated GUI where you get no stuttering like you would in XP under extreme disk swapping. So far, I have had no driver problems,
Even games like StarCraft which is a Direct X 5 Direct Draw Isometric game still humm's along like nothings been changed, all in all my experience has been great. And even if you do go out and buy vista you can still download the service packs when they eventually get released.

Its been known since the dawn of windows, that in every new release the system requirements increased as new technology's were brought in, If we all wanted an Operating system with low system requirements etc. We would still be in the days of Windows 95 or DOS.


RE: Price
By fic2 on 2/20/2007 11:32:55 AM , Rating: 1
I know two people that have tried upgrading a machine to Vista. One attempted to dual boot with XP. It blew away the XP partition. The other has been attempting to upgrade his media center. I think he has been working on it a week or so without success. Both of these are experienced computer users - first is a windows admin, second is a software developer.

If I want an OS with low system requirements I look towards Linux.


RE: Price
By TomZ on 2/20/2007 1:34:41 PM , Rating: 2
I think your friends are either inexperienced or imaginary. I've personally loaded Vista on a number of machines and experienced no real problems whatsoever. I've even been able to load up some pretty old apps, and more surprisingly, old device drivers (Win2K) and had everything work.

In addition, if your friends are having problems with Vista, why don't they call Microsoft for support? After all, that is the reason why we pay for software. I had to call Microsoft support for one of the machines when I started to load Vista, and they were very helpful. (Turned out to be a bad DVD that I burned.)

Finally, why don't you load Linux on your friends' machines. Then you'll get to personally experience their "joy" of using Linux. Suggestion: you may want to change your phone number, since you'll become their support contact.


RE: Price
By Ardan on 2/20/2007 2:29:19 PM , Rating: 2
I agree because I haven't had issues with old apps or drivers, either. I never have had a problem with installing Vista on computers since it was released either. One of them has Vista and Linux on different partitions of a huge hard drive with XP on another hard drive and we had no problems getting all that up and running. I don't think any of them, my computer included, have had any problems with Vista when it is running either. I'm still able to play BF2142 and others at the 1680x1050 my Samsung 215TW uses, too, without any noticeable drop in frame rate. I have an Athlon 64 X2 4200+ @ 2.81Ghz, 2x1GB Mushkin Redline XP4000 DDR500 ram and a 512mb ATI Radeon X1950 XTX though, so I would hope it isn't slower :P.


RE: Price
By msva124 on 2/20/2007 3:19:50 PM , Rating: 2
Would it help if his friends were Microsoft employees?


RE: Price
By wille22 on 2/20/2007 8:21:48 PM , Rating: 1
(This is not meant to start a flame war)

Tomz, I just read todays posts and i just happened to notice (And maybe I'm just late) But you really do seem to know a lot of information to rebuke anything said negatively about vista. YOU wouldn't happen to work for M or a subsidiary would you?


RE: Price
By TomZ on 2/20/2007 10:21:45 PM , Rating: 2
Thanks for asking, but nope, no business relationship with Microsoft. I've been using Vista daily for a few months now, that's all.

I do own an engineering company that does develop software (as well as electronics), and some of the work we do is on Microsoft platforms. But we also do embedded systems programming and Java as well.


RE: Price
By MrSmurf on 2/21/07, Rating: -1
RE: Price
By KenGoding on 2/21/2007 9:22:22 AM , Rating: 2
I own a company (small computer store in a small town) and I find time to read this site and other sites. I don't post much because I don't care to, but it seems kinda out of line to make such a bold statement as that.


RE: Price
By TomZ on 2/21/2007 9:35:15 AM , Rating: 2
Call bullshit if you want - it doesn't change the facts. :o)


RE: Price
By kmmatney on 2/20/2007 9:59:53 PM , Rating: 2
I tried installing Vista to dual boot on a spare hard drive. For some reason, it decided to corrupt my Windows XP hard drive. I had to do a repair install on windows XP, on call up Microsoft to get things activated again. A big pain. I now have to shut down and manually swap hard drive cables to keep things running in both OSes.


RE: Price
By Rockjock51 on 2/20/2007 3:09:51 PM , Rating: 3
Throughout the course of Vista's betas and now since release I've dual boot installed it with XP 5 times now, without a problem and I'm no admin or developer. Sounds like you either stretched the truth or that's just a lie. I guess they could just be really bad at their jobs too.


RE: Price
By kmmatney on 2/20/2007 10:03:10 PM , Rating: 2
I would consider myself experienced, but Vista hosed up my Windows XP drive when I tried installing it on an empty second hard drive. It could be because my windows XP drive was SATA, while the Vista hard drive was IDE. But I had to do a complete Windows Xp repair install, complete with phoning up Micrsosoft to re-activate.


RE: Price
By kelmon on 2/21/2007 6:59:22 AM , Rating: 3
Alternatively, since we know that part of the problem (or benefit, depending on who you ask) with the Windows platform is that the hardware in any given computer can vary with that of another, perhaps Vista just plays nicely on certain configurations and bad on others. Since this is a possibility I do find your comment to be pretty patronising - just because you had luck doesn't mean that others who didn't are either incompetent or liars.

I have no basis to know whether people complaining of installation problems are making it up or not but I certainly won't tell them that they are "stretching the truth" just because everything worked out OK for me.


RE: Price
By timmiser on 2/20/2007 1:47:00 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
IF you order from online hardware/software vendors, such as newegg, the pricing is on par with that of XP


I don't agree. Windows 95 through XP was $100 for the 'mainstream' retail upgrade edition. The home premium retail upgrade at Newegg is $154 so this represents a significant price increase for a new version of windows that doesn't really represent a major upgrade like XP was.

If you are referring to the OEM version, even that price has gone up ($90 for XP OEM and $120 for Vista OEM).

If you are comparing Vista basic with XP Home; by taking out the major user interface from the Vista product I don't think you can make a fair comparison of those two products.


RE: Price
By Obujuwami on 2/20/2007 10:38:00 PM , Rating: 2
I agree but I thought I would let you in on some info that may change your mind. I own my own it company and we are looking at upgrading our customers to vista and if that you are stating is true then Newegg is making approximately $7+ per unit of vista.

Now, I know that my distributor sells directly to Newegg and they maybe get a $5-10 discount per copy for ordering a 1000 copies. So, with the discount, that means thier profit is about $12-17 per unit...thats a pretty decent price for a OEM copy as I buy Vista Home Premium for $113. Newegg is sellnig Vista for less than a 10% mark up!


RE: Price
By mindless1 on 2/21/2007 5:24:25 AM , Rating: 2
I suspect you are underestimating the discount Newegg might receive on (post-1000) volume purchases.