backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 113 comment(s) - last by xk430.. on Feb 21 at 6:20 PM

Undersea cable owners still won't speculate on cause of cable cuts

Reports are coming in this morning that a fifth undersea fiber optic cable was severed in the Middle East. However, by several accounts, the fifth cable cut is actually a second cut on a different segment of the FALCON cable. How exactly these cables are being cut is still unknown, though Egyptian officials maintain a ship didn’t cause the breakages near the port of Alexandria.

The saga of cut cables and lost bandwidth began on January 23 when the Flag Telecoms FALCON undersea fiber optic cable near the Egyptian port of Alexandria was severed. On January 30 another cable called the SeaMeWe-4 (South East Asia-Middle East- Western Europe-4) cable was cut according to the Khaleej Times Online. Egyptian officials said that a review of ship traffic in the area at the time of the breakage precludes the damage being caused by a ships anchor.

Khaleej Times Online reports that on February 1 another cut appeared in the FALCON cable, which resulted in severe disruption of data service in the Gulf region. The rundown of cut cables in the region includes the FLAG Europe-Asia cable near Alexandria, FALCON near Bandar Abbas in Iran, SeaMeWe-4 near Alexandria, SeaMeWe-4 near Penang, Malaysia, and FLAG near the Dubai coast.

Mahesh Jaishanker executive director of Business Development and Marketing for TeleGeography is quoted by the Khaleej Times Online as saying, “The submarine cable cuts in FLAG Europe-Asia cable 8.3km away from Alexandria, Egypt and SeaMeWe-4 affected at least 60 million users in India, 12 million in Pakistan, six million in Egypt and 4.7 million in Saudi Arabia.”

DailyTech reported that the first pair of cables were severed on January 31, followed by a third cut undersea cable on February 4, and a fourth cut cable on February 5. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Iran
By TomZ on 2/6/2008 11:25:25 AM , Rating: 3
Copied from the last article on this subject...

By BuckNaked on 2/6/2008 1:44:48 AM , Rating: 2

Interesting to see who is being affected the most...

http://www.internettrafficreport.com/asia.htm

Great observation BuckNaked!




RE: Iran
By TomZ on 2/6/2008 11:27:31 AM , Rating: 3
RE: Iran
By FITCamaro on 2/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: Iran
By retrospooty on 2/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: Iran
By Alias1431 on 2/7/2008 3:07:24 AM , Rating: 5
Oh no! What will we do now that all our customer service calls can't be routed to India?!?


RE: Iran
By killerroach on 2/6/2008 11:47:05 AM , Rating: 5
You have to wonder, though... if that is the case, which side would it be coming from? One has to admit, such a cut of Internet access to Iran would probably be seen as a preservation of Islamic cultural values from the excesses of the West...

I don't quite get the CIA theory, mainly because of the fact that India's getting hit pretty good by this cut too, and something tells me that India would be about the last country one would want to anger in that region. Granted, nobody seems to credit the CIA for brilliant thinking...


RE: Iran
By P4blo on 2/6/2008 12:04:28 PM , Rating: 1
The impact upon Inda could be unavoidable. Most countries have multiple links to the outside world and it could be the only way to completely cut off Ahmadinnerjacket and his cronies from the Western Internet is to hack through every fibre line that might / could carry Iranian traffic. At the sime time this could be severing lines that are utilised by other nations.

This is all supposition but when you look at TomZ's link it does seem like Iranian isolation is the goal as that's the only nation to reach this result.


RE: Iran
By bpurkapi on 2/6/2008 12:20:04 PM , Rating: 5
Why does everyone think Ahmadinejad is important? He is a puppet to the higher ups. A quick breakdown of actual responsibilities and powers from Wikipedia:

Ayatollah Ali Khameni: The Supreme Leader of Iran is responsible for delineation and supervision of the general policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran.[69] The Supreme Leader is Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, controls the military intelligence and security operations; and has sole power to declare war or peace.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: The President is responsible for the implementation of the Constitution and for the exercise of executive powers, except for matters directly related to the Supreme Leader, who has the final say in all matters.


RE: Iran
By P4blo on 2/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: Iran
By retrospooty on 2/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: Iran
By encryptkeeper on 2/7/08, Rating: 0
RE: Iran
By qwertyz on 2/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: Iran
By dnd728 on 2/6/2008 12:56:16 PM , Rating: 2
Actually... there *is* someone who can...

Hint:
http://www.oldschoolreviews.com/rev_20/kid.htm


RE: Iran
By tjr508 on 2/6/2008 3:11:43 PM , Rating: 2
What about Paul Allen? He's a twisted tech guy and I hear he has his own submarine.


RE: Iran
By tjr508 on 2/6/2008 4:59:01 PM , Rating: 2
Follow up:

He also has "several former Navy Seals."

http://www.yachtcrew-cv.com/paulallen.htm


RE: Iran
By elessar1 on 2/6/2008 12:29:49 PM , Rating: 2
<conspiracy theory>
First Step before going to war: make your enemy blind...
</conspiracy theory>

And yes....it will bring the oils prices up, even when inventories are high in the states...

http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUST3...


RE: Iran
By VahnTitrio on 2/6/2008 12:36:35 PM , Rating: 4
One thing is for sure; whoever is doing this has a pretty good idea what they are doing. They have to have pretty reliable information about these cables, and even with GPS coordinates being able to exactly locate and damage these cables is no small feat, much less doing so undetected (at least undetected as far as we know).


RE: Iran
By Spuke on 2/6/2008 12:45:23 PM , Rating: 3
What I find most interesting is that this still able to be done while repairs are being made to the other cables. How is that possible?


RE: Iran
By Christopher1 on 2/9/2008 4:39:15 PM , Rating: 1
Because these cables, if I am remembering correctly, are in an area where a lot of ships come through, and a ship temporarily stopping would not be seen as 'strange'.


RE: Iran
By tmouse on 2/6/2008 12:49:03 PM , Rating: 3
Yes Florida and Wisconsin are also prime targets, please there are MANY routers out all through that area. This type of speculation is less than worthless. Lets take a drop of information and blow it totally out of proportion.


RE: Iran
By Ammohunt on 2/11/2008 3:52:17 PM , Rating: 2
you cut the cable in one place. Then you cut it somewhere else and install a device that can "listen in" on traffic while others attempt to repair it.