Print 38 comment(s) - last by flyingpants1.. on May 15 at 3:00 AM

i3 EV will cost about the same as a nice 3-Series

BMW debuted the new i3 coupe at the LA auto show late last year. The automaker has now announced that the car will be priced at approximately $40,000 when it goes into production later this year, making it roughly the same price as the company's incredibly popular 3-Series sedan.

The tip on pricing for the electric vehicle comes via BMW of North America CEO Ludwig Willisch. The CEO says that BMW [obviously] does not expect the electric car to be a volume model.

BMW will offer an optional two-cylinder 0.65-liter gasoline motorcycle engine and an auxiliary generator to charge the battery pack. That would make it somewhat similar to the Chevrolet Volt in operation.

The “green” BMW EV is expected to qualify for the $7,500 federal tax credit. BMW also notes that it is currently waiting to hear from federal regulators if buyers who purchase the range-extended version featuring the optional engine will be able to get the $7,500 tax credit as well.

BMW is set to establish a program that will allow buyers of the pure electric vehicle to borrow a gasoline or diesel vehicle for longer trips. He did say that details are unclear at this point but the service will be offered "as an additional mobility package."

BMW currently expects most of it US dealer network, consisting 338 locations, to sell the i3 and the i8 hybrid sports car

Source: Auto News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

It is not electric
By bigi on 5/7/2013 10:12:18 AM , Rating: 4
Cars with petrol engines such as Volt, Fisher, and this are not electric.

I wish this terrible trend has stopped.

Tesla S/X and Nissan Leaf are electric as there is electricity only that propels them.

RE: It is not electric
By axeman1957 on 5/7/2013 10:20:47 AM , Rating: 5
But I wish more auto makers did this.

Electric car with petrol range extensions. Because something needs to bridge the gap until re-charging can be done in as many places as refueling, and as quickly.

If you never use the fuel for your daily commute, but you want to go out of town on the weekends, you can. It is a backup system on an electric car.

RE: It is not electric
By Mint on 5/7/2013 12:36:35 PM , Rating: 1

What's better for pollution? Somebody buying a gas car because they can't live with a pure EV? Or getting an EV with a smaller battery pack but includes a tiny engine that I use 5% of the time?

This is the future. Hopefully we'll get natural gas microturbines instead at some point, but motorcycle engines are fine in the meantime, even if they aren't as efficient as an Atkinson cycle engine (which is why the Volt is also a good direction to go down).

If the Tesla 60kWh (or even smaller battery) put one of these tiny engines in the 'frunk', it would be more usable than the 85kWh version.

RE: It is not electric
By SublimeSimplicity on 5/7/2013 12:57:32 PM , Rating: 3
Rumors (based on patent filings) are that Tesla is a step ahead of this. They are planning to use a consumable metal-air battery from (probably Phinergy) for range extension.

So imagine a 40kWh car (150 mile range) that would be enough for day-to-day needs, combined with an Aluminum-Air battery that costs on par to fuel to use when you need more range. Plus the Aluminum-Air battery/fuel-cell only adds about 100lbs to car and simple integration (no complex gearing, pumps, or wear parts).

RE: It is not electric
By Mint on 5/7/2013 6:40:21 PM , Rating: 2
That's a very interesting idea. I had no idea that using aluminum a non-rechargeable battery could be cost competitive with gasoline. I always wrote off air batteries because of cycling issues.

So I guess once or twice a year you'd go somewhere to swap out the range extender cell for a new one, maybe 1000 miles for $100. Even twice that is reasonable.

That really would be a game changer. I could still see some people prefer a tiny engine with gas tank, though, as even those couple trips per year would be annoying without widespread infrastructure.

RE: It is not electric
By Brandon Hill on 5/7/2013 10:32:27 AM , Rating: 2
There are two versions of the car:

1) A pure EV (a la Leaf, Model S)
2) Range extended EV (a la Volt)

RE: It is not electric
By SublimeSimplicity on 5/7/2013 10:53:39 AM , Rating: 1
Minor correction. The Volt is very similar to a Prius, where the ICE can directly power the wheels. The ICE in the i3 is connected to a generator and is designed to supplement electricity from the batteries. The i3 is much more like the Fisker than the Volt.

pro: ICE operation is efficient, range only limited by size of gas tank
con: Heavy, complicated, expensive

pro: Light, compact, simple
con: Inefficient in gas mode, range still limited by battery capacity.

RE: It is not electric
By Mint on 5/7/2013 12:56:46 PM , Rating: 2
The Volt is very similar to a Prius, where the ICE can directly power the wheels
It can, but this only happens in limited situations. It's basically a serial hybrid with a clever transmission that optionally lets it operate as a parallel hybrid when cruising.

As for the i3/Volt comparison, don't forget that the i3 has the additional expense and weight of a bigger battery, so it's not clear that Volt's drivetrain is "heavy, complicated, expensive". Then you have to look at driving patterns to see if the lower gas mileage on the i3 can offset the motorcycle engine's inefficiency and lack of direct coupling.

BTW, are you sure the i3 has range limited by battery capacity? The generator would only need 20-30hp to be able to cruise at 65mph and maintain a reserve in the battery for acceleration and passing.

RE: It is not electric
By SublimeSimplicity on 5/7/2013 1:01:57 PM , Rating: 2
BTW, are you sure the i3 has range limited by battery capacity?

Yes, reports are that the battery only range is 100 miles and 200 miles with the range extension. So it appears its not capable of keeping up with consumption on its own or they've chosen and extremely small fuel tank for unknown reasons.

RE: It is not electric
By Mint on 5/7/2013 7:51:19 PM , Rating: 2
It's not that unreasonable, as the target buyer isn't expected to drive much with the range extender. The simple engine probably gets 25MPG, so that's be 4 gallons, and a larger tank that rarely gets used is a waste of space in a compact.

Google tells me that it's a 35 hp engine, and that's enough to keep up with consumption, so I suspect you can keep filling up when the battery is depleted. If BMW is smart, they'll let the battery charge a bit with the generator so that it can be occasionally used for acceleration, rather than having only 35 hp in range extending mode.

RE: It is not electric
By lelias2k on 5/7/2013 12:56:48 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry, but that's is incorrect.

The Volt is an extended range hybrid. There are extreme situations when the engine helps the electric motor, but that represents a minimal percentage of the time, if the owner is using it correctly (i.e. charging the battery as it should).

The Prius is a regular hybrid, which is powered mainly by the engine and assisted by the electric motor, but apart from slow speeds, it is always using the engine. That should diminish in the plug-in version, but the regular one is like that.

RE: It is not electric
By SublimeSimplicity on 5/7/2013 1:12:39 PM , Rating: 2
Think about the physics here. The engine is running creating mechanical energy. Instead of putting it directly to use as mechanical energy, the car is going to convert it to electricity (10-15% loss) and then back to mechanical energy (another 10-15% loss).

RE: It is not electric
By Solandri on 5/7/2013 2:41:54 PM , Rating: 2
Whether that's good or bad really depends on what the car is doing. Remember, the ~30% engine efficiency is only true for a specific RPM and specific load. If the RPM or gearing or incline/decline deviates from the optimal, the engine efficiency will be worse.

In that case, the conversion losses from an engine operating 100% of the time at its most efficient RPM and loading to charge a battery, may be smaller than the reduced efficiency of an engine spending most of its time at non-optimal RPM, gearing, and loading.

RE: It is not electric
By SublimeSimplicity on 5/7/2013 4:09:54 PM , Rating: 2
The planetary gearing allows the engine to stay at its optimal RPM, regardless of vehicle speed. However it doesn't do that to generate electricity or I should say that's not its primary goal. As much of the engine power as possible must be sent to the wheels to achieve a high mpg, the leftover is sent to the generator.

The way they need to balance electric load on the generator, torque to the motor to keep the engine in its highest efficiency is an insane engineering feat. I'm surprised it ever made it past the whiteboard.

RE: It is not electric
By nafhan on 5/7/2013 3:26:04 PM , Rating: 2
con: Inefficient in gas mode, range still limited by battery capacity.
Are you certain of that? Trains are serial diesel-electric in order to increase efficiency, and their range is limited by fuel in the tank, not battery capacity.

If you're referencing something particular to this vehicle (and not serial hybrid vehicles in general) that I missed, my apologies.

RE: It is not electric
By SublimeSimplicity on 5/7/2013 4:16:08 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, particular to this vehicle. The range extender isn't powerful enough to maintain interstate speeds.

A diesel-electric train is a very different beast. The choice to decouple to engine from the drive wheels is because of the massive torque. The drivetrain loss to create a gearing that would hold up to torque demands are higher than the losses to go between mechanical and electric energy.

RE: It is not electric
By nafhan on 5/7/2013 6:22:46 PM , Rating: 2
Interesting info about the i3's engine. In this kind of configuration (i.e. range extender can't provide power to drive the vehicle), it seems like it might make sense to have a selectable "long range" mode that would run the ICE whenever battery drain is occurring - this would minimize the chances that you are left in a position where the battery is dead and there's still fuel in the tank.
The drivetrain loss to create a gearing that would hold up to torque demands are higher than the losses to go between mechanical and electric energy.
This sounds like something that may be true for specific implementations, rather than as a general rule. At the very least, it seems like something "they" would be working to rectify. I may also be completely wrong... :)

RE: It is not electric
By Mint on 5/7/2013 8:05:15 PM , Rating: 2
The range extender isn't powerful enough to maintain interstate speeds.
I really don't think you're right. 35hp, even after losses, is plenty for that.

A Leaf gets 102 MPGe on the highway, and that works out to 16kWh average power for the test, including inefficiencies from accelerating/braking and charging loss. A Prius only needs ~15 hp to maintain 60 MPH.

The 35hp range extender in the i3 is plenty for that.

RE: It is not electric
By SublimeSimplicity on 5/8/2013 8:53:51 AM , Rating: 2
I was curious about this, so I ran an experiment this morning in my LEAF. I reset my mi/kwh as I entered the interstate and maintained my speed between 70 and 80mph. The outcome was 3.1mi/kWh. This half of my commute is overall downhill, so lets call it 3mi/kWh to keep the math simple. At 75mi/h * 1/3 kWh/mi = 25kw. The BMW engine is rated at 35hp = 26kW, so with generator losses this is just about right.

So I admit I was wrong. What boggles my mind then, is why they would rate the range with the range extender at 200mi? Why limit it so severely by the size of the fuel tank?

RE: It is not electric
By Mint on 5/8/2013 9:18:27 PM , Rating: 2
I really think it's just space. The idea is to not use the range extender much at all, so it's probably not very efficient (maybe 25 MPG) and they didn't want to waste more than 4-5 gal of space. Stopping for gas every 90 minutes isn't so great, but it's not terrible.

RE: It is not electric
By foxalopex on 5/8/2013 10:52:49 AM , Rating: 2
Actually you probably need more power than 35hp to maintain interstate speeds. I own a Volt which uses a 75hp engine so I have a bit of experience to reflect on this.

While 20hp is enough for highway crusing, you'll probably run into serious problems with 35hp if you are trying to climb a massive mountain. It may not be an issue depending on where you live but having that limitation is a problem. On the Volt, this problem is avoided by using mountain mode which reserves roughly about 1/2 the battery for hill climbing. GM wasn't kidding when they said they tested the Volt from Alaska to Mexico.

Also in very cold climates such as Canada which is where I live, the battery will essentially shutdown if the Volt is left in the extreme cold for hours unplugged. This happens because I don't have a plug at work. This is probably to protect the battery. I can attest trying to drive the volt on a 75hp engine alone isn't very pleasant. The engine sounds like it's really trying hard. While the i3 will likely be lighter than the volt due to amazing amounts of carbon fibre, I have a bad feeling that if only powered by the gas generator, it will likely be completely at full throttle which isn't very healthy for any gas engine.

RE: It is not electric
By SublimeSimplicity on 5/8/2013 11:10:34 AM , Rating: 2
The engine they're using, when in a moped is rated at 65hp. That is obviously peak, non-continuous, and not at all fuel efficient. I'm guessing the 35hp is the max rating for continuous. Not max fuel economy, but max continuous power.

I'm going to guess that it gets a HWY mpg rating of 30 or less on the range extender.

RE: It is not electric
By Qapa on 5/7/2013 11:00:52 AM , Rating: 2
And that might be very important, specially if they do an additional little thing... allow the "option" of adding the range extender later.

The reason being, in some countries you pay 0% car taxes for an electric car. Then making the change you'd probably pay something but not for the overall value of the car, it would be for the value of the add-on, and maybe some additional certification.

RE: It is not electric
By foxalopex on 5/7/2013 10:43:36 AM , Rating: 2
I don't think this is a good way to view this. By electric you mean as in battery power only because in all these cars there's a primary electrical drive motor.

To me an electric car means:

1. It needs to be plugged in to be recharged.
2. Can at least do highway speeds / accelerate on battery power only.

Besides, the addition of a generator is a good move as far convenience is concerned. If this is your only car, it's going to be hard to go on that cross country roadtrip. Plus in cooler climates such as Canada, a battery only system won't work too well if at all in the winter.

Also a lot of folks don't realize this but gasoline has an incredible amount of power in it. The volt's 500lb battery has about a 38 mile range. A volt on gas mode uses about a gallon of gas in that distance which weights no where near 500lb. Keep in mind too a majority of power in a gas engine is also lost as heat which in the winter is good for heating the car. This is why a pure battery car won't be good for everyone on the market for years to come.

RE: It is not electric
By axeman1957 on 5/7/2013 10:50:28 AM , Rating: 2
Good addition to the point I was trying to make... I am still on my first cup of coffee.

RE: It is not electric
By Masospaghetti on 5/7/2013 11:00:20 AM , Rating: 2
They are not pure electric, and they are better for it. Most people want a car with more than ~75 miles of range. While Tesla has managed to break that handily, the battery pack is still extremely expensive and it will be some time until a mass market / non-luxury EV can function as a long distance cruiser.

A small gasoline generator with a small battery pack gives most of the benefits of an EV with none of the downsides.

RE: It is not electric
By Cheesew1z69 on 5/7/2013 8:33:04 PM , Rating: 2
BMW will offer an optional two-cylinder 0.65-liter gasoline motorcycle engine
Pretty sure "optional" you missed?

Car design
By Etern205 on 5/7/2013 9:46:54 AM , Rating: 3
Somehow that car looks like a chubby hamster, where it just woke up on the wrong side of bed.

RE: Car design
By mjv.theory on 5/7/2013 10:45:28 AM , Rating: 2
For several years now Audi ninja have been sneaking into BMW factories at night to beat all the finished cars with an ugly stick. That said, the i8 looks suitably sexy, but this i3 thing is unnecessarily ugly.

RE: Car design
By topkill on 5/7/2013 10:50:27 AM , Rating: 3
What is it about making an EV that somehow causes normally intelligent, and imaginative designers to start envisioning pregnant roller skates or chubby hamsters?

Is this some type of mental illness induced by the EMF of the electric motor or something?

By luv2liv on 5/7/2013 10:36:31 AM , Rating: 2
for that price, i might as well get a luxury car, maybe a Lexus.

RE: $40,000????
By lelias2k on 5/7/2013 12:59:20 PM , Rating: 2
If you don't understand the purpose of such car, then you definitely should.

RE: $40,000????
By Spuke on 5/7/2013 4:02:02 PM , Rating: 2
If you don't understand the purpose of such car, then you definitely should.
He doesn't have to.

RE: $40,000????
By freedom4556 on 5/7/2013 4:09:12 PM , Rating: 2
He shouldn't have to, but the greeny hippies think that he should, so he may someday be forced to (due to lack of consumer choice).

So there you have it
By Dr of crap on 5/7/2013 12:40:27 PM , Rating: 2
A Bemer priced the same as a Volt, and they wonder WHY the Volt doesn't sell?

And BMW comes right out and says it DOESN'T except to sell a lot of these EVs.
WOW imagine that.
GM are you paying attention?

RE: So there you have it
By freedom4556 on 5/7/2013 4:07:22 PM , Rating: 2
Anticipated regulatory compliance is why they're making this (and the Volt). The CEO of Alfa and Mazzer said that he anticipates having to make hybrids to match increasingly loony fleet fuel economy requirements.

By shmmy on 5/7/2013 5:44:52 PM , Rating: 2
This car is also supposed to be mostly carbon fiber to save weight.

Cheaper to drive than a civic
By flyingpants1 on 5/15/2013 3:00:18 AM , Rating: 2
Owning this BMW i3 EV + paying for electricity is now cheaper than owning a Honda Civic sedan + paying for the gas every month.

This car is $32.5k after tax rebate. Let's say you bought this car on a 72 month term, payments would be $450/mo plus electricity.

Payments on a Honda Civic would be $489/mo including 15k miles of gas for 6 years.

This car is enough to handle your 58 miles to work and back every day with electric power, that's 15,000 miles on electric drive only, every year. Plus the extended gas range. It's like a cross between a LEAF and a Volt - enough electric range for 99% of trips, plus a tiny cheap backup.

"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki