backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 54 comment(s) - last by matriarch wolf.. on Feb 27 at 3:06 PM

New rules seek to shield minors and bolster the country’s already strict censorship laws

January 20 will mark an era for Australian Internet content, as sweeping new rules will take affect that enforce mandatory age-verification on mature or adult-oriented web pages and services.

According to a press release from the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), “content service providers” are required to verify and enforce the minimum age of all individuals attempting to access content that is rated according to the Australian classification office’s MA15+ (mature, restricted to age 15 and up) or R18+ (restricted to age 18 and up) ratings.

Telcos are under additional controls as well, as the new rules require age verification by the cell provider on “premium rate SMS or MMS services” and “mobile content portals.”

The new rules come from the Australian government’s Restricted Access System Declaration 2007, which governs “age restricted content” across almost every information medium in Australia. All content, including web pages and mobile phone content, is examined by the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) and assigned a rating according to the country’s national ratings system.

Content that is rated above the R18+ rating (namely, X18+ or "refused classification") is banned entirely from the Australian Internet; if that content is found to reside within the country its owner is sent a “takedown notice,” and if content resides outside of Australia it is added to the blacklist on the country’s mandatory Internet censor.

The Declaration makes no mention of how it would handle user-generated content, leaving social networking and similar services in a legal gray area. According to the press release, ACMA will “continue to liaise and consult on these matters” with the industry.

While developing the new rules, ACMA chairman Chris Chapman said that the committee “was guided by its disposition to allow adults to continue to read, hear and see what they want, while protecting children from exposure to inappropriate content,” yet simultaneously acting “conscious of avoiding unnecessary red tape for Australian businesses.”

Australia has long carried a reputation for having one of the most restrictive censorship protocols in the western world. Books, movies, and video games that are rated X18+ (roughly equivalent to AO or NC-17) are heavily restricted in their sale – oftentimes, banned entirely – and content that does not fit into any of the OFLC’s guidelines is banned and blocked from import.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Positive in my mind
By BradCube on 12/26/07, Rating: 0
RE: Positive in my mind
By eye smite on 12/26/2007 7:25:55 PM , Rating: 1
I'm glad to see a gov't taking a real stand on the issue of content and decency. I know America never will, there's no profit in it. This country doesn't do anything unless there's money to be made and porn makes money. Nuff said.


RE: Positive in my mind
By threepac3 on 12/26/2007 7:54:04 PM , Rating: 1
I'm sure some in our(US) government would like to regulate it just as much as you would. I for one think its appalling for the government to step in and regulate it. I'm noticing trend with such countries as Canada and Australia to control as much as possible what people hear in see.


RE: Positive in my mind
By Missing Ghost on 12/27/2007 12:34:35 AM , Rating: 2
Canada? Canada is like the opposite of Australia when it comes to censorship... If you want to talk about countries that act like Australia when it comes to this, I know Poland does all the time.


RE: Positive in my mind
By omnicronx on 12/27/2007 11:43:45 AM , Rating: 2
So very very true, in the states lots of violence is the norm. Canadian shows are the kings of dirty sex jokes. It's no germany, but it is far from censored, you should hear what they can say on the radio here compared to in the states. I don't go a morning without hearing the words 'rusty trombone' or 'dirty sanchez'.


RE: Positive in my mind
By mdogs444 on 12/27/2007 11:47:09 AM , Rating: 2
The "rusty trombone" hahaha. Havent heard that in a while.....how about the "dizzy gillespie"? haha


RE: Positive in my mind
By afkrotch on 12/27/2007 2:27:56 PM , Rating: 3
Hmm....live in Australia. Out of the question. So would I get a takedown notice if I talk to my wife all dirty on the phone? Here's a better idea. Use the money and resources to kill spam entering the country instead. Porn is a legitimate business and they should just tax the sites.

I doubt they can they'll be able to stop much of anything. Millions of torrents for porn are made each day and are distributed through tons of different sites. They going to have the whole population of Australia scouring the internet for this content?

Probably some politician's attempt to garner support from the public.


RE: Positive in my mind
By fake01 on 12/29/2007 8:35:01 AM , Rating: 2
I agree with it. I don't like the idea of my little brothers or cousins hopping on my PC and looking up porn or some dirty content.

Also They may not be able to prevent people from downloading torrents, considering (like you said) there is so many websites to download them from. I mean they can probably put a block on ".torrent" extension, but people can simply put them in ".RAR" files etc.

But they can block the actual torrent program from working. I don't know how, but my school did it. I tried installing several different download managers and torrent programs, and none of them worked. Hell I even installed Firefox and it didn't work.

I guess each program, when they connect to the internet send a code or something so they can detect other clients etc. I guess the ISP's can pick this code up and block them.


RE: Positive in my mind
By eye smite on 12/28/2007 11:03:59 PM , Rating: 1
There are certain things that don't need to be seen on video or internet or anywhere. Take beastiality for instance, do you want to see that? Do you know how many support calls of outraged customers I've taken because they went to whitehouse.com thinking they'd teach their kids about the whitehouse instead of whitehouse.gov. So again I'm glad to see a gov't sticking to decency and enforcing despite what people think. If you want to see bestiality, it's ok, I'm sure you can go to your local XXX video store and rent it just fine.


RE: Positive in my mind
By matriarch wolf on 2/27/2008 3:06:33 PM , Rating: 2
oops


RE: Positive in my mind
By MGSsancho on 12/26/2007 7:56:04 PM , Rating: 5
How about parents doing a better job in watching their childs online activities? you dont even need software or gps. just take the dsl/cable modem with you to work then hook it up on an agreed upon terms. and if the child really needs internet, libraries


RE: Positive in my mind
By amanojaku on 12/26/2007 8:15:35 PM , Rating: 4
Agreed. Parents need to do their jobs, which includes making sure children learn at school, eat a healthy diet, and not look at material unsuitable for minors. Once the government steps in everyone has to worry about what might be the next illegal act. Like chewing gum. It's illegal in Singapore.

There was a time when alcohol was illegal in America (prohibition) and people drank anyway. Drugs are illegal, but I'm willing to bet that will change before I die. Why should any activity that isn't inherently dangerous be illegal? Porn is no different. (Some people can and will argue that alcohol, drugs, and porn are dangerous, but there are plenty of people who can prove otherwise.)


RE: Positive in my mind
By Missing Ghost on 12/27/2007 12:36:49 AM , Rating: 1
Porn is dangerous?


RE: Positive in my mind
By amanojaku on 12/27/2007 3:51:54 PM , Rating: 2
Not that I am aware of, but anyone can claim anything is dangerous. Why do we need "Caution! Hot!" labels on cups of coffee? Duh, I ordered a HOT coffee. But if I spill it on myself I can sue you for 10 million dollars because the label isn't there...

I have heard arguments against porn, none of which I buy into. Take a look at the Wikipedia entry on porn to see what I'm talking about. The only ban I have against porn is that children shouldn't have access to it, because they shouldn't be having sex.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography#Anti-porn...


RE: Positive in my mind
By Oregonian2 on 1/2/2008 8:30:16 PM , Rating: 2
Hormones will probably be outlawed next. :-)

P.S. - Isn't prostitution not-illegal in Australia? I seem to remember something fuzzy along those lines.


RE: Positive in my mind
By andrinoaa on 12/27/07, Rating: -1
RE: Positive in my mind
By TomCorelis (blog) on 12/27/2007 1:32:56 PM , Rating: 3
An "attitude towards authority" is a good thing, in my mind. Much of the "authority" in this world needs to be questioned and kept in check...


RE: Positive in my mind
By Drexial on 12/27/2007 4:09:43 PM , Rating: 3
absolutely.

I for one fully believe that parents need to step up responsibility. Stop passing the buck, It's your kid, stop trying to blame everyone else for their attitude. If you let them play the game its not the makers fault or the fault of the store that sold it to them (not saying they should be selling rated games to minors). I believe most movies and games are rated fairly for their content.

By no means am i saying treat your kid like a prick. But respect them just as you want them to respect you. Give them answers for things, don't make crap up. If they have questions don't say "ummm uhhh a stork dropped you off". You don't have to go into details to make a kid understand what they want to know. Kids aren't as retarded as everyone seems to think they are.

I learned to question things at a very young age. Because my parents gave me real answers to the best of their knowledge I never went through a true rebellious phase. What was I supposed to rebel against? "why did you always have to give me answers when I asked questions?"

Though I should say parents, My mom was far more open with me then my dad. My dad was an ass, and I was an ass back to him, my mom respected me and I respected her back... SHOCKING.

I feel this is the way it should be with all authority. Respect is a two way street.


RE: Positive in my mind
By amanojaku on 12/27/2007 3:57:54 PM , Rating: 2
Sigh... how can I explain this in terms you'll understand...

If I say parents should do their jobs how is that an argument AGAINST authority? Or are you saying parents aren't a form of authority?

What I attempted to point out is the extremes to which a government can go in order to "protect" its citizens. In what way is a ban on pornography protecting anyone? Show me and I'll accept that. But there are plenty of ridiculous laws that are not protecting anyone, and in fact infringe upon personal freedom.