backtop


Print 129 comment(s) - last by th3pwn3r.. on Jun 30 at 2:20 AM


The Supreme Court has cleared the way to start pumping E15 onto the market.  (Source: DigitalTrends)
E15 also expected to create higher carbon emissions, higher food prices

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a complaint filed against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the Alliance of Automobile ManufacturersAssociation of Global AutomakersOutdoor Equipment InstituteNational Marine Manufacturers Association, and the American Fuel and Petrochemicals Manufacturers, which might have challenged upcoming EPA rules which allow E15 blends (15 percent ethanol, 85 percent gasoline).

The decision upholds the District of Columbia’s Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling that the complainants lacked the legal basis to challenge the sale of E15.

In the U.S. the government does not currently demand stations buy blended ethanol, however it constricts the supply of unblended gas by forcing refiners to buy "blending credits" based on the quantity of ethanol they blend in.  To meet upcoming quotas, refiners will virtually have to sell at least some E15 to stations and consumers.

While stations have been slow to adopt higher ethanol blends due to fear of consumer backlash, automakers fear that the decision to back the 15 percent ethanol blend will ultimately force refiners to start pushing E15 out onto the market.

Current prices of ethanol are around 29.66 cents per gallon less than gasoline [source].  But the threat of fines will likely force refiners to bite the bullet and starting pumping out E15, now that their appeal is dead.

E15 permeates and damages parts made of rubber, plastic, metal, and other materials in engines not specially sealed to allow the use of higher ethanol blends.  All automakers certify their vehicles for E10. Some automakers certify their vehicles for E15 use, but many don't. 

Chrysler Group LLC, Toyota Motor Corp. (TYO:7203), Nissan Motor Comp., Ltd. (TYO:7201), Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW), and Volkswagen AG (ETR:VOW) all warn customers not to use E15, saying it will void their warranty.  No ATV or motorcycle manufacturer in the U.S. currently approves of E15 use, according to The Detroit News -- using E15 in any standard motorcycle will void its warranty.

The nation's largest travel organization, AAA, has already warned that the results of allowing E15 to be sold at the pump will be disastrous -- millions of Americans may have their vehicles damaged and warranties voided.  AAA President and CEO Robert Darbelnet, comments, "AAA believes it is both premature and irresponsible to sell E15 to consumers while these issues remain unresolved."

But the EPA's perspective appears to be that Americans should ditch the bikes, ATVs, and older cars, and buy "green" sedans instead; and if you don't like that "tough".

The Renewable Fuels Association is pleased with that approach.  Its CEO Bob Dinneen commented SCOTUS ruling, "I am pleased that today’s Supreme Court action ends a long and drawn-out petroleum industry effort to derail the commercialization of E15.  The uncertainty created by this lawsuit has chilled commercial activity that would provide American consumers more affordable choices at the pump."

corn profits
Big corn is pleased with the decision. [Image Source: Agriculture.com]

E15 is indeed more affordable, but in addition to the engine damage potential, it also gets significantly lower MPG than pure gasoline fuel.  Thus customers may not realize any savings; in fact they may even overall end up paying more when using E15 with compatible vehicles.

In addition to all the aforementioned issues, studies have suggested that going from the corn-field to fuel pump corn ethanol is an energy negative process, consuming more energy than it produces, and offering up higher life-cycle carbon emissions that standard gasoline.  And use of feed corn on ethanol has "accidentally" driven food and livestock feed prices upward.  The ethanol industry again, is relatively unsympathetic, offering the vague argument that corn ethanol preserves domestic security and feeds money into the U.S. economy.

Sources: Renewable Fuels Association, AAA, Detroit News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Death to the RFA
By Motoman on 6/25/2013 5:17:59 PM , Rating: 4
Uh-huh. Let's compare that to the study you linked to back up your claims...oh. Right.

I guess we'll just go ahead and believe you, without any proof, and against the advice of essentially every motor vechicle manufacturer in the world.

Hey, don't worry guys...Mint says it's OK.


RE: Death to the RFA
By Mint on 6/28/2013 7:45:05 PM , Rating: 2
You obviously have zero science background if you can't tell how flawed that study is.

What are these groups asserting? E10 is fine, E15 is not.

What does your study test? E20 vs E15 vs E0 in three engines (one of which failed with all fuels), E20 vs nothing in five engines. E10 was not tested. How does that not raise red flags?

It says "five passed on E20 and by assumption E15 and E0". That assumption creates a bias: You will never have an engine pass on E20 and fail on E0. Vehicle 8 failed on all fuels, proving that their testing methodology can produce failures unrelated to ethanol.

If I flip a nickel and dime and ignore the times the nickel is heads and dime is tails, then of course my results will show the nickel is tails more often than the dime. That doesn't mean the dime is a more reliable way to get heads.

There is no basis for saying E15 "WILL DESTROY YOUR FUEL SYSTEM AND ENGINE" from this study.

Here's a far more expansive study from ORNL:
http://feerc.ornl.gov/pdfs/pub_int_blends_rpt1_upd...
There's no threshold effect between E10 and E15. Some emissions went up while others went down, but it's all linear.

Look, I don't like corn ethanol being used as a fuel. I wish we never went down this road. However, it's now economically competitive without subsidies and the cat's out of the bag. The free market should be allowed to accept or reject E15.


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki