backtop


Print 107 comment(s) - last by crispbp04.. on May 24 at 11:34 AM

She won the $50,000 Intel Foundation Young Scientist Award

A high school student from California has created a way to charge cell phones completely in just 20-30 seconds. 

Eesha Khare, 18, of Saratoga, California, recently won the $50,000 Intel Foundation Young Scientist Award for her fast-charging device. 

The device uses an improved supercapacitor that can store a lot of energy into a small space using a nanorod electrode. It is capable of 10,000 charge-recharge cycles and can fully charge a cell phone in 20-30 seconds. 

Traditional chargers typically take hours to achieve a full charge, and are capable of only 1,000 cycles for rechargeable batteries.


Khare said her supercapacitor has been used to power an LED, and sees her invention being placed in cell phones in the future.

"It is also flexible, so it can be used in rollup displays and clothing and fabric," Khare said. "It has a lot of different applications and advantages over batteries in that sense."

This definitely isn't the first time a high school student has come up with a brilliant invention in recent years. Just last year, 15-year-old Jack Andraka invented a new pancreatic cancer test that earned him the $75,000 prize from another Intel-sponsored fair. 

Source: NBC News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Paper
By EricMartello on 5/20/2013 6:43:46 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
You're missing the point, the battery makers tailor the geometry of the battery to optimize for high current draw or high capacity.


You disagreed with my generalized statement about 1C being a safe charge rate for modern rechargeable batteries, then you found some batteries that you thought would support your idea - but they did not.

You are right, 1C may not always be the OPTIMAL charge rate but it's safe to say that it's VIABLE.

quote:
Look at the discharge graphs, the high capacity ZTA has almost a 250mV drop between the 0.2C (0.6A) and the 1C rate (3A), while the low capacity SAX has only about a 100mV drop between the 0.2C (0.27A) and the 2C rate (2.7A).


Despite this, they both remain within 200 mV of their nominal rated voltages for at least half of their respective capacities...but this isn't what I was talking about.

At which point do you demonstrate where a 1C charge or discharge rate would be unsafe for either of these batteries? You seem to be hung up on the difference between 'optimal' and 'viable'.

quote:
You linked to a Lithium ion CR3032 that could be charged or discharged at 1C, I linked to one that cannot. Your blanket statement of "any modern rechargeable battery at 1C" is wrong.


I'd be willing to bet money that the one you linked to could be charged at 1C even if the spec sheet says no.

I would also say that what's commonly accepted by most people as a 'rechargeable battery' is not one of these niche button cells, rather it would be a cell phone, camera battery, AA or AAA type - all of which will charge and discharge safely at 1C.


RE: Paper
By MrTeal on 5/20/2013 7:59:45 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I'd be willing to bet money that the one you linked to could be charged at 1C even if the spec sheet says no. I would also say that what's commonly accepted by most people as a 'rechargeable battery' is not one of these niche button cells, rather it would be a cell phone, camera battery, AA or AAA type - all of which will charge and discharge safely at 1C.


Actually, you're right there. I thought I'd inserted a link to the 100mAh coin cell I was talking about, but I obviously missed it.
http://www.panasonic.com/industrial/includes/pdf/P...
A button cell is hardly niche, there's billions of them made each year. They're just tailored to a different market, low self discharge and high capacity in a small size without a need for much current draw.

1C isn't some magic number, it's just that rather than choose to list energy storage in joules or some other unit, they settled on Ah. That many batteries can be charged in an hour or less doesn't grant some special physical significance to 1C.


RE: Paper
By EricMartello on 5/20/2013 11:24:53 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
A button cell is hardly niche, there's billions of them made each year. They're just tailored to a different market, low self discharge and high capacity in a small size without a need for much current draw.


What I meant by niche is that coin cells are not a common type. They're used in motherboards, clocks and compact devices that require something to preserve backup memory or whatever. Often they're installed by the factory and the consumer never worries about it until it dies, which can be years. A typical battery-powered device is going to use AA or AAA type batteries...but anyway I know what you were saying.

quote:
1C isn't some magic number, it's just that rather than choose to list energy storage in joules or some other unit, they settled on Ah. That many batteries can be charged in an hour or less doesn't grant some special physical significance to 1C.


EXACTLY! It is nothing special which is why I made my original statement in response to another poster's comment claiming that there was some wide discrepancy as to the typical charge/discharge rate for a battery.

The C in 1C refers to the capacity of a given battery in amp-hours, so 1C means 1 times capacity rating. You could have any number there to describe a particular charge or discharge current.


"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki