Print 67 comment(s) - last by lexluthermiest.. on Feb 11 at 7:50 PM

It will save USPS $2 billion annually

Many aspects of our lives have made a digital transformation over the last decade or so. We no longer rent physical movies from the video store; we watch them on Netflix or Hulu. We no longer get subscriptions for or pick up the daily newspaper; we read the news online. We don't run to the bank as often for daily finances; we jump on our smartphone, tablet or computer for online banking.

The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) is seeing these shifts in technology as well, but can't seem to keep up. Many letters, bills, etc. can now be sent electronically rather than through the mail. Hence, in an effort to save some serious money, USPS will no longer deliver mail on Saturdays starting August 1, 2013.

Cutting mail delivery down to five days per week will save USPS about $2 billion annually. For fiscal 2012, USPS saw a net loss of $15.9 billion (three times the loss record one year previous).

While mail delivery is getting axed, USPS plans to continue package delivery on Saturdays since this particular area has seen a 14 percent increase since 2010. Mail will also still be delivered to P.O. boxes six days per week as well.

In addition, post offices will remain open on Saturdays to allow customers to drop mail/packages off, access post office boxes or buy postage stamps -- although hours will likely be cut.

USPS is expected to give an official announcement today without explicit congressional approval. Lawmakers have said this approval is necessary for a change like cutting Saturday mail delivery, but the USPS is arguing this claim.

As far as the American people go, USPS expects some opposition from those like rural communities that worry a change in scheduling could make low-cost deliveries of items like medication a thing of the past, and publishers who will have to adjust schedules with publication deadlines.

Just last month, it was reported that USPS wanted to be more digital-friendly in order to keep up with the times. The agency is working on a digital platform called MyPost, which will allow customers to log in and view all packages that they'll be receiving as well as those they've already received instead of searching several different sites that the packages may be coming from.

However, Paul Vogel, president of digital solutions at USPS, revealed that his office is like "a San Jose startup," with only 15 Android/Apple developers, consultants coming and going, one computer and his BlackBerry smartphone. Technological restrictions make upgrading hard to come by.

A few other major obstacles are legislation needed to get permission for new digital products, the USPS' huge instruction manual for just handful of current products (adding digital products and security certifications would turn that 1,500 page book into something unimaginable), and USPS' losses of nearly $16 billion last year led to legislative proposals to keep making cuts (hence, more digital tech may not be in the cards right now).

Source: Boston Business Journal

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Dont blame the internet and email
By Motoman on 2/6/2013 11:58:34 AM , Rating: 2
I don't agree with #2, that is the only thing keeping them alive is bulk mailers.

It's incredibly low-margin. That's the problem. Make it cost more to send bulk mail, and the volume goes down - meaning you need fewer resources to process it. And because it costs more, the margin you make on what remains is much better.

A lot of the time you can do this sort of thing and wind up making the same overall revenue number, but have much better margin on it.

RE: Dont blame the internet and email
By bah12 on 2/6/2013 12:14:17 PM , Rating: 1
A lot of the time you can do this sort of thing and wind up making the same overall revenue number, but have much better margin on it.
Except they would not be allowed by the unions to cut the workforce to make up for the loss in volume. In principal it works, but they are too in bed with the unions to properly lay off the workforce no longer needed. Coupled with the fact that they still have to travel the miles to look for little red flags (and thus cannot lay off any of that workforce), and quite frankly they are better off with the higher volume lower margin as their model does not scale well with volume.

RE: Dont blame the internet and email
By Motoman on 2/6/2013 12:46:11 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, which is why one of my points was getting rid of the union too.

By bah12 on 2/6/2013 12:58:40 PM , Rating: 1
Totally agree there, but if you still require them to drive by each box daily the volume reduction only impacts inter post office miles, and sorting. You'd still have lots of un-productive miles. IMHO they really do need to be allowed by congress to implement a call for pickup model. Do that, and then you can kill all bulk discounts.

Take a look next time you drive out of a subdivision on how many mailboxes have a flag up, yet the postman still has to weave through the entire area looking for them. Luckily he has some revenue generating bulk in his bag or those miles would be all cost.

You and I are on the same page, but I don't think many people really understand just how complex the issues are. It isn't just a management issue. In fact very little of it is. The vast majority of their problems are Congress driven.

Several drastic changes need to occur for them to recover, but alas the union lobby will eventually kill them.

By nshoe on 2/7/2013 12:11:11 PM , Rating: 2
Make it cost more to send bulk mail, and the volume goes down - meaning you need fewer resources to process it.

The problem there is is already costs less to process bulk mail. I have actually been involved in prepping a bulk mailing that a non-profit I volunteered for was mailing out. You have to use machine readable mailing labels, you have to presort the mail by zip code and bundle based on those zip codes. Basically all the post office has to do is throw the bundle in the correct pile, then sort and deliver at the final destination.

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki