backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 12 comment(s) - last by Pirks.. on Aug 7 at 7:37 PM

Leopard, Mac Pro, Gaming, Hardware, Software, iPod

Today marks the first day of Apple's annual World Wide Developers Conference. The event is dedicated to developers for Apple's platform and usually comes with a host of announcements and product unveilings. This year's WWDC06 is one that's quite important for Apple because the company will be talking a great deal about its next major operating system upgrade -- Leopard.

From Cheetah to Tiger, OS X has gone through several versions, all of which have introduced new features and upgrades. Leopard will be Apple's single most important upgrade to date because it includes a host of brand new features and not just updates. Boot Camp, Apple's method of dual-booting both OS X and Windows XP will make a full appearance in Leopard. In its current state, Boot Camp only officially supports Windows XP but there is a possibility that the full version being introduced in Leopard will support other OSes as well. It was originally rumored that Leopard would support OS virtualization but Apple later denied that Leopard would ship with such functionality. Apple has since been documenting Parallel's virtualization software -- the first virtualization application for Intel-based Macs -- across much of its website.

Although Leopard does not appear to be scheduled for release in 2006, hopes are up. The new OS will integrate new desktop searching features competitive with other solutions such as Google's Desktop Search and the searching features being introduced with Windows Vista. Other notable features are VoIP integration and there has been talk about Leopard including geographical mapping features directly integrated into the OS.

A new line of Apple computers are also expected to make an appearance at WWDC this week. Because the conference is focused largely on developers, many are expecting that Apple will introduce new pro-level desktops. Many sources indicate that the desktops will be called the Mac Pro. According to several sources, Apple's Mac Pro will be using Intel's latest Woodcrest Xeon processors.

Following Apple's dual-processor but quad-core G5 desktops, the new Xeon processors are a likely choice because of their ability to operate in a dual-socket configuration, whereas their Core 2 Duo desktop counterparts cannot. With that in mind, DailyTech believes that Apple will be introducing a lower cost, single-chip, Core 2 Duo desktop line called the Mac -- although a showing at WWDC06 may not be likely. The new Mac will be an entry level desktop computer with upgradeability options not available in the iMac such as add-in PCIe expansion, larger memory upgrades, hard drive expansion options and other features not feasible in the iMac. The big difference between the Mac Pro and the Mac will be dual or single processor support.

Another key area for developers is Apple's Xserve family of servers. The transition to over to Intel processors is very likely, and Apple is expected to talk about the direction of its server products this week at the conference. Like the Mac Pro desktops, the Xserve family will be moving over to Intel's newest dual-core Xeon processors.

Software applications will also be a large part of the show. Several key companies including Adobe and Microsoft will be at the show, talking about their respective applications and future outlooks. Interestingly, Apple will be talking about the future of gaming on a Mac and what the company has in stores for game developers. Apple is looking at pushing game development for OS X up a few notches with several sessions detailing about developing next-generation games for Intel-Macs.

Other expectations include updates to the iPod, although exactly what Apple will be talking about is unknown. Although Apple's CEO Steve Jobs may briefly talk about the iPod -- most likely sales numbers and progress -- Apple's presentation and conference sessions do not indicate any heavy focus on any of Apple's entertainment products, although there will be discussions on development for such products.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

How is a Mac different than a PC again?
By archcommus on 8/7/2006 12:12:44 PM , Rating: 2
From the article:
quote:
The new Mac will be an entry level desktop computer with upgradeability options not available in the iMac such as add-in PCIe expansion, larger memory upgrades, hard drive expansion options and other features not feasible in the iMac.


So, if almost everything is upgradeable, and they use Intel CPUs and are capable of running Windows, how is a Mac different than a regular PC exactly? Sounds to me like just a proprietary motherboard, and an operating system that won't run with any third-party boards and chipsets.




RE: How is a Mac different than a PC again?
By epsilonparadox on 8/7/2006 12:25:24 PM , Rating: 2
It isn't. Its in a nicer case though. Apple decided it wasn't content with only 1% of the global pc market and to take on MS, it needed to build a pc with a face lift. People will flock to it since you can install windows and run windows apps on a more stable platform than most winpcs.


RE: How is a Mac different than a PC again?
By archcommus on 8/7/2006 12:35:59 PM , Rating: 2
I will only flock to it if it becomes equally affordable and upgradeable as my PC. I don't think that's going to happen any time soon if ever.


By MonkeyPaw on 8/7/2006 2:28:50 PM , Rating: 2
If it is truely as upgradable as it sounds, you get the cheapest one and then upgrade it with newegg parts. I'd be willing to spend Macmini-esq prices for an upgradable tower that can run OSX. Apple would still make money selling a case, software, and most of the components. By making something that's end-user upgradable, "Mac" only helps Apple's cause. Those that typically know how to upgrade often have a willingness to spend more money on computers. I'd imagine the case will be very well designed, so it would have some enthusiast appeal. Now imagine if you could overclock. OC-camp, anyone? :D


RE: How is a Mac different than a PC again?
By Pirks on 8/7/2006 1:22:22 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Apple decided it wasn't content with only 1% of the global pc market and to take on MS, it needed to build a pc with a face lift. People will flock to it since you can install windows and run windows apps on a more stable platform than most winpcs.

I'd say Apple just targets a slightly different market than your generic PC builder. They traded open architecture for easy to use factor, which shows that they, at least at the present moment, don't want to appeal to a small market of overclockers and newegg self-builders, but they like to establish a major brand similar to Toyota or maybe even Mercedes in a much larger "general public's" PC market. I mean, they want this subconscious image that their PCs are always slicker, thinner, sexier, frendlier and work better than "others", or other "generic" PCs.

I guess their way is the only possible way to take onto behemoth like MS. Linux and OSS in general didn't even scratch MS sufrace on desktop, although they compete well in servers. Jobs somehow struck gold here after years and years of wandering around with NeXT which was way too ahead of its time. It seems that the market has grown and warmed up to accept some of his ideas, and most important PC hardware grown to the levels that can carry another behemoth on its shoulders - I mean new incarnation of NeXT called OS X. Apple is an interesting fusion of NeXT plus some heretical ideas, like build everything on your own (I know they buy Chinese chips/boards/HDDs and everything, I mean system design overall), build your own OS, your own apps for this OS, and complement this with your own retail channel.

Seveal years ago I would have said this is insanity, since everyone is building on top of MS foundation and then just assembles another generic PC and sells it, so why take risk and build your own costly infrastructure, your OS and everything?

It looks like the market just needs and likes good alternatives and a lot of noobs and general public (not AT readers and newegg overclockers) find Apple's model of home computing very attractive. MS was also putting pressure on the market by delaying new OS release infinitely, and yet another factor was the lack of tighter OS/hardware/apps/service/style integration in PC world. Some of brands like Alienware and Shuttle went in that direction but they were too small to build their own integrated empire (with OS/apps and everything).

With OSS everywhere around it was just a matter of time before some company would try to build its own commercial OS on top of it, and add its own hardware design and maybe retail chain. I think there were several Linux companies who tried this model of business long before OS X came around, but I'm not sure if I remember this correctly. They didn't try their own retail chain of course, but they tried selling pre-built and integrated Linux PCs, but the general public's market did not need it, it seems. And then Jobs appeared and just polished that idea - got lotsa money, built some half open source Unix half proprietary NeXT stuff operating system plus apps, made his own fancy case design and he's already got final variable in the equation - his own retail. All it took was just to analyze where MS failed and hit its weak spots, which they did.

Results? Any OS review site with its salivation over OS X and laments about Vista, including Thurriott's and Anand's reviews, speak for themselves. You just have to stay one step ahead of MS and integrate your stuff into OS faster than they do and bingo - limelight is always on you and you live in fame.

In the end I must say the situation where MS has 95% of desktop OS market is unhealthy, and the faster Apple captures its 50% the better - MS needs some push, we all see that they sit and do nothing if there's no competition. MSIE needed FF to appear and Vista needed OS X to appear, so unless you kick MS hard in the nuts several times, they won't move... too bad but I think every company works this way, so MS is nothing special.


RE: How is a Mac different than a PC again?
By jarman on 8/7/2006 6:53:06 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Linux and OSS in general didn't even scratch MS sufrace on desktop, although they compete well in servers.


Compete well? How many web servers are running IIS?


RE: How is a Mac different than a PC again?
By jarman on 8/7/2006 6:56:06 PM , Rating: 2
Much fewer than Apache


By Pirks on 8/7/2006 7:37:49 PM , Rating: 2
That's why they compete well ;-)


Wooo!
By AppaYipYip on 8/7/2006 12:26:21 PM , Rating: 2
Can't wait!




Come on, Merom MacBook Pro...
By kelmon on 8/7/2006 12:49:08 PM , Rating: 2
I think the title says it all. The announcement of one of these will result in my credit card leaping salmon-like from my wallet.




Always makes me laugh
By kattanna on 8/7/2006 2:29:52 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Apple will be talking about the future of gaming on a Mac


now dont get me wrong..i'd love to see more gaming on macs...or more correctly more games portable between various platforms, and apple switching to X86 processors will help with compiler issues and such. But gaming hasnt been trully viable on macs for a long..long time.

and with their ability now to boot into XP on their machines or use the new emulator, *cringes*, there is actually less and less of a reason to make true mac games.





it's getting closer..
By irsyz on 8/7/2006 11:34:00 AM , Rating: 1
1.5 hrs and counting!




"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser













botimage
Copyright 2008 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki