backtop

Print E-mail del.icio.us 32 comment(s) - last by Domicinator.. on Feb 27 at 8:39 PM

17" MacBook Pro  (Source: Apple)

13.3" MacBook  (Source: Apple)
Apple drops Intel's 45nm processors into its MacBook, MacBook Pro

Apple created quite a ruckus last month when it launched its ultra-slim MacBook Air ultra-portable notebook. The 13.3", three-pound notebook features a cut-down Core 2 Duo processor, 13.3" screen and Multi-Touch trackpad (which accepts gesture commands like the iPhone and iPod touch).

In late January, AppleInsider's inside sources leaked that Apple's MacBook Pro notebooks would be refreshed in the coming weeks to accept new Intel Penryn processors along with Multi-Touch.

The sources were correct and Apple today announced updated MacBook Pro and MacBook notebooks. Apple's MacBook Pro notebooks now feature Multi-Touch, Intel's 45nm Core 2 Duo processors (up to 2.6GHz) and a 512MB NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT graphics processor.

Apple's 15" MacBook Pro (1440x900) comes standard with a 200GB or 250GB 5400 RPM HDD depending on the model selected. A 200GB 7200 RPM drive is optional. The 17" MacBook Pro (1680x1050) features a 250GB 5400 RPM HDD as standard equipment -- a 200GB 7200 RPM HDD and a 300GB 7200 RPM HDD are on the options sheet.

The entry-level 13.3” MacBook (1280x800) also received some minor updates although it doesn't add Multi-Touch to its repertoire. The MacBook is available with a 2.1GHz or 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor and is available with HDDs ranging in size from 120GB to 250GB.

Both the updated MacBook Pro and MacBook models are available now. Pricing for the 15" and 17" MacBook Pros start at $1,999 and $2,799 respectively. The 13.3" MacBook starts at $1,099.

Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Meh...
By mmntech on 2/26/2008 10:35:36 AM , Rating: 2
Nothing really exciting here. Just a speed bump. The vanilla MacBook seems to have received a bit of a price drop in Canada. I seem to remember it selling for $1249 now it's down to $1149, which is still $50 more than it is in the US despite the dollar being at par. I also would have preferred 2gb DDR2 be standard in the base model as well, or at least a faster RAM clock speed. I still might save up for one though given my iBook G4 is really starting to show it's age running Leopard.




RE: Meh...
By dcalfine on 2/26/2008 10:38:23 AM , Rating: 2
The 45nm processor will consume much less electricity, and the multi-touch trackpad can actually make a huge difference in efficiency for some. But, generally, I agree. I was hoping for more.


RE: Meh...
By themadmilkman on 2/26/2008 10:45:41 AM , Rating: 2
Given the popularity of the laptops with college students, I would imagine that an overhaul would wait until the summer to generate excitement for the school purchase season.


RE: Meh...
By DASQ on 2/26/2008 11:25:43 AM , Rating: 3
That's what the June release day is for.


RE: Meh...
By daftrok on 2/26/08, Rating: 0
RE: Meh...
By DASQ on 2/26/2008 12:54:09 PM , Rating: 2
Apple is great for sidesaddling price increases on features.

Notice you cannot upgrade to the DVD burner in the base model. If you'd like to burn DVD's, you need to swallow a $200 upgrade for the DVD burner, and then some extra stuff you didn't need/want. I'm assuming the DVD combo drive unit exists simply to advertise "MacBook's starting at $1099!!"


RE: Meh...
By JDoobs on 2/26/2008 8:12:03 PM , Rating: 2
Just wondering exactly the 'June release day' is and if I should be waiting to buy my Macbook for school?


RE: Meh...
By kzrssk on 2/26/2008 11:32:01 AM , Rating: 2
I'm about to get a MacBook Pro for work, so this is actually exciting for me. I won't have to change or justify anything since it's a refresh, and as I understand it, the price stays the same.


RE: Meh...
By XPguy on 2/26/08, Rating: -1
RE: Meh...
By mikeyD95125 on 2/26/2008 9:57:25 PM , Rating: 2
You mean, " Apple should have to pay you for their laptops.
Their laptops are not very well made. "?

I feel bad attacking an 8 year old on grammar and spelling. :(


iPhone SDK?
By dcalfine on 2/26/2008 10:33:59 AM , Rating: 2
This is great and all, but didn't Apple promise us an iPhone SDK?

Also, how common are these 45nm processors in notebooks? And why aren't they quad-core?




RE: iPhone SDK?
By Lonyo on 2/26/2008 10:38:38 AM , Rating: 2
Because quad core = more power intake, more heat, and are more powerful than necessary for a laptop.
Same reason you see 3+GHz processors on the desktop, but these top out at 2.6GHz.


RE: iPhone SDK?
By kelmon on 2/26/2008 1:32:44 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Also, how common are these 45nm processors in notebooks? And why aren't they quad-core?


More common now since the Penryn launch but I believe that Intel is having supply problems so it's restricting their availability.

Quad-core would require someone to make a quad-core processor for notebooks. Intel has plans for this (not sure about AMD) later this year but the best you'll get here is a desktop processor. As powerful as a desktop processor is, put that in a laptop and you'll either get something as big as a desktop, or will spontaneously combust, or possibly both.

With respect to the iPhone SDK, it's already been reported that Apple will miss the February release date by about 1-3 weeks. However, nothing official has been seen and there's still a few days left to prove the reports wrong.


RE: iPhone SDK?
By winterspan on 2/27/2008 6:41:08 AM , Rating: 2
The Penryn "Core 2 Extreme" laptop quad core part isn't out until late spring/early summer. Even then, I'm sure it has a very high TDP rating, and Apple makes thin and quite laptops, so I doubt you'll see one in a Macbook Pro.


Good changes
By FluxCap on 2/26/2008 10:47:23 AM , Rating: 2
I really like the Pro line of laptops from Apple. I have been a desktop PC gamer for a long time but that is about to be phased out (console gaming exclusively). I would probably buy the cheapest model of the Pro, especially with the same touch screen functionality of the iPhone (I currently use one).




RE: Good changes
By MasterTactician on 2/26/2008 1:02:16 PM , Rating: 2
Funny. I bought the Pro specifically because it was THE BEST 15" sub-5.5lbs gaming laptop at the time (Summer 07), and also the most powerful DX10 laptop on the market (though that wasn't saying much, the 8600M GT is no miracle when it comes to performance, but it gets the job done - Crysis is even playable at med-low settings). I think I've used OSX less than 20 hours in the last 6 months (suck it apple), but Vista Ultimate x64 works like a charm (since the MacPro Bootcamp drivers were leaked earlier this year) - ALL MacBook Pro drivers and functions work in x64.

Sure, I paid a premium, but what other laptop at the time had all of the below:
1) LED Backlit Screen
2) 8600M GT or equally capable GPU for gaming
3) Battery life of 3-5 hrs
4) Weight and dimensions of 5.4lbs, 1" thickness and small bezel around the screen
5) 5.1 / 7.1 Surround sound Output (and input) via a mini Optical port
6) Dual Link DVI (was almost impossible to find on a PC laptop before the 8-series, I'm not sure what things look like now)
7) Backlit and very well-built Keyboard

Overall, I think the Pro justified its price with the extra (and in some cases exclusive) features it provided. It’s also nice to be able to dual boot into OSX if anything goes wrong in Vista (which it did, naturally, last month). I'm quite satisfied with it, though I doubt I fit the "average apple fanatic / form over function" demographic as well as others might lol.


RE: Good changes
By Domicinator on 2/27/2008 8:39:49 PM , Rating: 2
See, you're the kind of Mac user I LIKE. It doesn't bother me so much that people like the hardware. I admit, Macbooks look pretty cool. (Though I have a Gateway laptop that looks very similar to a Pro at least from a distance.) But I shudder to think of a world where Mac OS is the dominant software. I HATE Mac OS. I'm glad people are learning how to dual boot. It brings Apple down a notch when people aren't using that crappy OS and it kind of just turns them into a hardware maker like everyone else.

I think if I had a Mac I would just get rid of OSX completely (if that's possible) and just run Windows on it.


RE: Good changes
By kelmon on 2/26/2008 1:36:34 PM , Rating: 2
I have a 17" MacBook Pro from October 2006 and I still think it's a stunning piece of engineering. However, while gaming under Boot Camp does work, the one game that I wanted to play on it (Dawn of War) keeps crashing even after the official launch of Leopard. Other games that I've tested, like Half-Life 2 run great but DoW always seems to crash after about 30-minutes (BSoD). I don't know how common this but it's something to be aware of.


error
By thornburg on 2/26/2008 11:16:01 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The 13.3" MacBook Pro starts at $1,099


The 13.3" model is known as the MacBook, no "Pro".

It really is too bad this isn't a bigger update--LED Backlit screens on all the models (at least as an option) would have been very nice. Instead, it is only available on the most expensive model, and costs extra.




RE: error
By DASQ on 2/26/2008 11:30:47 AM , Rating: 2
That's a fairly standard Apple product feature line up.

LED backlights would be nice. I'm not very interested in the MacBook's themselves, but the more that are in use on the market, the faster LED LCD's get cheaper.


RE: error
By Chadder007 on 2/26/2008 12:03:53 PM , Rating: 2
Same here....I was wanting LED for Macbook.


RE: error
By ebakke on 2/26/2008 11:33:13 AM , Rating: 2
And where are the higher resolution monitor options?? Cripes!