backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 56 comment(s) - last by Jedi2155.. on Jul 11 at 9:47 AM

Apple cuts the price on the 64GB SSD and 1.8GHz processor upgrades

Apple released its 13.3" MacBook Air sub-notebook in January to much fanfare. The notebook weighed in at relatively light three pounds and measured just 0.76" at its thickest point. Because of the slim profile and light weight, the MacBook Air launched with a rather hefty price tag.

The MacBook Air started at $1,799 in its base 1.6GHz configuration and ballooned to $3,098 when equipped with a 1.8GHz processor and a 64GB solid state disk (SSD). With SSD prices now taking a nose dive, Apple is now passing those savings along to the consumer.

While the base 1.6GHz system with an 80GB HDD still rings in at $1,799, the pre-configured 1.8GHz system with a 64GB SSD now only costs $2,598 -- this represents a $500 price cut for consumers. In addition, Apple also cut the price of upgrading from a 1.6GHz processor to a 1.8GHz processor on the base machine from $300 to $200.

Despite the $500 price drop, the 64GB SSD still represents a $599 option and one that many potential customers may have trouble swallowing. This becomes even more apparent given the recent announcement from OCZ concerning low-cost, high-performance SSDs.

OCZ's new 32GB, 64GB, and 128GB SATA-II SSDs ring in at $169, $259, and $479 respectively and will be available shortly. The 64GB and 128GB models will be out on July 11, while the 32GB models will saunter in during the third week of July.

But the availability of OCZ's new low-cost new SSDs may be of little comfort for current MacBook Air owners -- the MacBook Air features a PATA interface which is incompatible with most new SSDs being released these days. Hopefully Jobs and company will switch over to a SATA interface when the MacBook Air gets its inevitable refresh.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Flash becoming cheap
By excelsium on 7/3/2008 5:33:33 PM , Rating: 2
32GB SSD @ $169... :].




RE: Flash becoming cheap
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 7/3/2008 5:36:32 PM , Rating: 2
Amen, brother. I'll be picking up one as soon as they are available :-)


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By tastyratz on 7/3/2008 8:53:57 PM , Rating: 2
I spoke with OCZ and was given this information directly. I posted this in the ocz article as well, but here is all you need for release dates

email 1

It should be available at www.zipzoomfly.com after July 11th, the 64GB and 128GB will be rolled out first and 32GB right after.

email 2

32GB will be out 3rd week of July. Yes, we already sent out of bunch reviewers samples so you will be seeing those benchmarks very shortly.

Tom Wong

OCZ Technology

Senior Account Manager


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By daftrok on 7/4/2008 6:08:27 PM , Rating: 2
There is an error in this article. The upgrade to 1.8 GHz used to cost $300 dollars; now it is a $200 upgrade.

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB003LL/A?mco=...


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By daftrok on 7/9/2008 5:06:08 AM , Rating: 2
Now it's WAS an error.


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By ajfink on 7/3/2008 5:36:45 PM , Rating: 2
And you don't have to buy a piece of fashion hardware to use it.


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By pxavierperez on 7/3/2008 6:11:37 PM , Rating: 2
does it give any considerable weight difference when using the SSD drive?


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By Clauzii on 7/4/2008 3:49:30 PM , Rating: 2
The OCZ drives are 77 Gram each., so compared to an average 2½" drive, it's around 25 grams lighter. But consider that it also produces half the heat (approx.)


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By michael2k on 7/3/08, Rating: -1
RE: Flash becoming cheap
By InternetGeek on 7/3/2008 6:53:17 PM , Rating: 4
They don't want to switch. Simple as that. What they use simply works. And they are good using it, so the combination is the best for them... same as for hundreds of millions.


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By JoshuaBuss on 7/3/2008 7:11:20 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
what is wrong with ALSO being fashionable?


no integrated ethernet, only one usb port, and a non-removable battery for starters?

i hate how apple equates 'elegant and simple' with 'lacking basic functionality'. if they didn't just remove blatantly useful features i'd probably love their stuff.. but when you're one of the more expensive games in town, you can't be missing things.


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By michael2k on 7/3/08, Rating: 0
RE: Flash becoming cheap
By borismkv on 7/3/2008 9:01:54 PM , Rating: 5
Except that both of those computers actually have these things called CD drives that you can use to *gasp* install software with. And an ethernet port that you can use if you actually have a need to use anything other than wireless for networking. And yes, I often do disagree with Apple's design choices because I believe that form should follow function and not the other way around. Yes, it's a pretty, snazzy little laptop. But it sacrifices just a bit too much for my tastes. It was designed to be marketed only to the Apple fanboys of the world. Most of the people that actually *need* a small laptop also need one that's highly functional.


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By hiscross on 7/3/08, Rating: -1
RE: Flash becoming cheap
By murphyslabrat on 7/4/2008 1:24:01 AM , Rating: 5
Your Mom's computer also has a dual-layer DVD-drive, a decent CPU, and enough HDD space to actually work with; all for under $600. So what if it can't fit in a manila envelope...why the hell would you want to put a laptop in one anyway?


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By saiga6360 on 7/4/2008 3:17:43 AM , Rating: 4
Too cheap to buy a carrying case.


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By murphyslabrat on 7/4/2008 2:02:16 PM , Rating: 3
If you are willing to pay 3k on a computer, I doubt a carrying case is going to be an issue.


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By ZaethDekar on 7/4/2008 7:02:36 PM , Rating: 2
Didn't you know that Apple ships the air in the envelope? Cuts down on shipping for the company.


RE: Flash becoming cheap
By just4U on 7/6/2008 7:50:07 PM , Rating: 2
they could use that as their green initiative and the sad thing is it just might work...