Apple, Google, Adobe, and Intel Pay $324M to Settle Salary Conspiracy Case
April 25, 2014 8:02 PM
Settlement is the largest employment lawsuit in the U.S. tech sector
Four top Fortune 500 tech firms -- Intel Corp. (
), Google Inc. (
), Apple, Inc. (
), and Adobe Systems Inc. (
) -- agreed to a massive settlement in what is believed to be the largest public employment lawsuit settlement in the history of California's Silicon Valley.
I. A Massive Settlement
Together the four firms will pay
(or roughly $5,050 USD per worker before lawyer fees) to a class of 64,000 tech employees who filed suit against these corporate giants over allegations of collusive non-hire agreements, agreements that the plaintiffs' lawyers argue violated federal antitrust laws and drove down wages.
Kelly Dermody, a lawyer at
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein
, the firm representing the plaintiffs, hailed the settlement as a key win. And it's not the first win in the noncompete hiring scandal.
Between 2005 and 2010 a number of tech companies reportedly entered into secret, collusive noncompete agreements that limited wages. [Image Source: Fistful of Talent]
Two other firms -- The Walt Disney Comp.'s (
) Pixar and business software provider Intuit Inc. (
) -- had already pledged an additional $20M USD over similar claims (with Pixar paying $9M USD and Intuit paying $11M USD).
The case had been set to go on trial next month. Legal experts say had it gone to trial Google, Apple, Intel, and Adobe may have wound up paying far more.
The tech companies admit in the face of irreufutable evidence that the did enter into noncompete agreements over recruiting employees from each other. But they argue that those agreements didn't drive down wages.
II. Google's Schmidt Likely Fired HR Employee for Defying Anticompetitive Scheme
But a jury would likely be credulous of that argument, experts say, given the damning sound of emails from some of the executives involved.
For example the late Steve Jobs -- CEO and cofounder of Apple -- personally complained in an email to then-Google CEO Eric Schmidt after he caught wind that a Google recruiter had solicited one of his employees. Eric Schmidt apologized and said the recruiter would be fired. Steve Jobs forwarded the email to a top Apple human resources executive with an ASCII smileface.
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt reportedly fired an employee for hiring an Apple employee
[Image Source: AP]
Another email between a Google HR director and Mr. Schmidt ended in a mutual agreement to cover up the practice to avoid getting sued. The filing states:
Schmidt responded that he preferred it be shared 'verbally, since I don't want to create a paper trail over which we can be sued later?'
The court record noted that the HR director agreed.
In court such views would likely turned the jury against the tech executives, given that many of the documents paint a clear picture that indicates the tech executives may have known what they were doing was illegal and purposefully tried to cover it up.
The case would have been tried before a familiar face --
Judge Lucy Koh
(who presided over
the first trial in Apple's lawsuit against Samsung Electronics
)). The case was scheduled for May in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
in San Jose, Calif.
But the tech firms had a trump card of their own. They threatened to employ a tactic that could have made it so jurors never got to hear the case at all. They were planning to appeal it to a federal appellate court, arguing the class was invalid. If they could ban the plaintiffs from acting as a class, they could much easier beat down any individuals who would likely lack the costly legal representation need to beat the assembled legion of corporate lawyers.
Federal Judge Lucy Koh
In other words, both sides ran a risk if they pushed on ahead through the courts. Instead they decided to settle.
The plaintiffs and lawyers for the companies involved will show up in court on May 27, following a similar hearing to approve the Pixar and Intuit deals next week. At the hearing the two parties will disclose some terms of their settlement, including -- potentially -- how much each company is paying. Typically, companies divide costs in this kind of case by the percentage of employees from that company in the class.
III. No More Noncompete
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) already
probed this possible illegal anticompetitive arrangement
. In 2010 Google, Apple, Intel, and Adobe agreed to
drop their noncompete pacts
, to prevent antitrust fines.
Some companies were opposed to the practice from the start. Facebook, Inc.'s (
) Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg publicly criticized a 2008 offer from Google to avoid poaching each other's employees. But perhaps the harshest criticism came from the now-defunct Palm.
Steve Jobs made the bold move of threatening to sue Palm if it didn't go along with his "likely illegal" scheme. [Image Source: Telegraph UK]
Apple's Steve Jobs
tried to bully Palm
into no longer poaching Apple employees, by
threatening to file suit
. But Palm's Chief Executive Officer at the time, Edward Colligan, was unintimidated, correctly noting it was Mr. Jobs who was likely doing something illegal. He told his foe:
Your proposal that we agree that neither company will hire the other’s employees, regardless of the individual’s desires, is not only wrong, it is likely illegal.
Looks like he was right. Now Apple and those who engaged in similar practices (including Google) are paying big time, even as they continue to insist they did nothing wrong.
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein [press release]
"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il
Apple's Steve Jobs Used Patent Lawsuit Threat to Bully Palm Into No-Hire Policy
January 23, 2013, 4:12 PM
Doomsday for Samsung in U.S., Jury Rules it Slavishly Infringed Apple's Patents
August 24, 2012, 5:56 PM
Google Hires Former Senior Apple Director for "Secret" Project
February 6, 2012, 11:20 AM
Palm CEO Rejected Apple's Jobs' Call for Truce on Poaching Employees
August 20, 2009, 9:12 AM
Google Boss Refuses to Quit Apple Job Amid Probe
May 10, 2009, 3:47 PM
Nokia 3310 with longer battery life
February 28, 2017, 7:05 AM
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 – This Chinese Phablet is the Best
February 24, 2017, 7:25 AM
How Apple watch Series 2 differ from the S1
February 18, 2017, 5:37 AM
Can your smartphone make you a safer driver?
February 15, 2017, 6:20 AM
What do you or do not know about Apple iPhone 7 &7+
February 8, 2017, 9:27 AM
February 6, 2017, 6:49 AM
Most Popular Articles
Gigabit Are you looking for an Ultra Compact board?
February 22, 2017, 6:30 AM
Dell XPS 13 Touch – Rose Gold Edition
February 23, 2017, 7:29 AM
ASUS ROG Maximus IX - Among the Best of the Best
February 21, 2017, 7:50 AM
Comparison: Tag Heuer Connected Modular VS Samsung Gear S3
February 20, 2017, 7:20 AM
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 – This Chinese Phablet is the Best
February 24, 2017, 7:25 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Gaming News of The Day
Feb 28, 2017, 6:56 AM
How much Ram do you need for gaming?
Feb 27, 2017, 6:00 AM
Interesting News of the Day
Feb 25, 2017, 7:37 AM
AMD and More
Feb 24, 2017, 5:55 AM
Feb 23, 2017, 6:30 AM
Feb 21, 2017, 6:12 AM
Here is how startups are helping new parents in raising children
Feb 20, 2017, 6:45 AM
Around the World
Feb 18, 2017, 5:48 AM
News of Future
Feb 17, 2017, 6:30 AM
Amazon parachutes May Float Packages to Customers
Feb 16, 2017, 8:00 AM
Now you Can Watch Facebook on Your TV
Feb 15, 2017, 7:42 AM
Feb 14, 2017, 5:36 AM
Razer Blade Stealth – Little Kaby Lake Powerhouse
Feb 13, 2017, 7:50 AM
Android 7.0 Nougat 7.0 Update Bring Less Battery Life for Samsung Galaxy S7 & S7 Edge
Feb 12, 2017, 7:45 AM
Apple iPhone 8 – OLED Display & Wireless Charging
Feb 11, 2017, 8:09 AM
Feb 10, 2017, 6:15 AM
Feb 9, 2017, 6:00 AM
Eye catching news
Feb 8, 2017, 6:16 AM
Some World News
Feb 7, 2017, 6:15 AM
Feb 6, 2017, 10:11 AM
Feb 5, 2017, 7:27 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2017 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information