backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 45 comment(s) - last by rsperry79.. on Apr 3 at 3:00 PM


Vista with 28 days left on activation

Vista after running command before restarting

Vista activation reset after restart
Microsoft-supported feature can stretch Windows Vista grace period up to a year

Despite being the most advanced version of Windows yet, Vista allows surprising freedom for casual pirates to run unauthorized copies of the new operating system. Last month, DailyTech detailed a procedure in which a user may extend his activation grace period on any installation of Vista up to 120 days, up from the 30 days out-of-the-box.

Brian Livingston of Windows Secrets has taken that trial-extending procedure to the next level through with some tinkering of the Registry. The “slmgr –rearm” command run on any version of Vista will reset the grace period countdown back to 30 days, a maximum of three times for a total of up to four months. Newly uncovered is a Registry key that could give up to eight more 30-day trials on top of the three Rearms for as much as a year of non-activated Windows Vista usage.

The specific Registry key is named “SkipRearm” and is found in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\SL. By default, the SkipRearm Registry value is 0, but changing it to 1 will allow the Rearm command to be run “an indefinite number of times,” thus extending the grace period.

While unscrupulous software users may use this to avoid buying a genuine copy of Windows, the SkipRearm method by itself is legitimate. Microsoft’s TechNet site details the feature: “Rearming a computer restores the Windows system to the original licensing state. All licensing and registry data related to activation is either removed or reset. Any grace period timers are reset as well.” Setting the Registry value of SkipRearm to 1 negates any intention of Rearming, but, for some reason, it works to extend the number of times the command may be issued.

The Rearm and SkipRearm features are part of Sysprep, Microsoft’s tool used by administrators to prepare an installation of Windows for imaging or delivery to a customer. An important note on Microsoft’s TechNet documentation on Sysprep reads, “If you anticipate running Sysprep multiple times on a single computer, you must use the SkipRearm setting in the Microsoft-Windows-Security-Licensing-SLC component to postpone resetting the activation clock. Because you can reset the activation clock only three times, if you run Sysprep multiple times on a computer, you might run out of activation clock resets. Microsoft recommends that you use the SkipRearm setting if you plan on running Sysprep multiple times on a computer.”

Livingston presumes that these apparent loopholes in Windows Vista activation exist to ease the burden on corporate IT administrators, who may have to activate thousands of machines upgrading to the new operating system.

On a test of copies of Vista Ultimate and Vista Home Premium from January, the “slmgr –rearm” command worked three times and the SkipRearm key worked eight times for upwards of a year of non-activated Windows. On a copy of Vista Home Premium purchased in March, however, SkipRearm had no effect on extending the use of “slmgr –rearm” at all, suggesting that Microsoft has quietly released an updated version into stores. Livingston believes that business editions of Vista—Business, Enterprise, and Ultimate—will still support the Sysprep commands for their legitimate IT uses.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why, Activation, Why?
By kelmon on 3/22/2007 5:41:38 AM , Rating: 2
I'm sure this has been said many times but why are we even allowing ourselves to be put through this? Without trying to start a flame-war I'll note that Apple's OS doesn't require activation and everyone seems to be happy with that. Why does Microsoft need to do this since it just inconveniences the regular user and never seems to represent much problems to those who don't want to pay for a copy of the OS? I've had to spend time on the phone to Microsoft a number of times in the past trying to activate my legitimate copy of XP after I have upgraded my computer or installed it under a virtual machine (all OK according to the license agreement). This pisses me off and doesn't stop piracy.




RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By Johnmcl7 on 3/22/2007 9:53:38 AM , Rating: 2
Apple in an entirely different position though - you cannot use their software on a generic X86 machine which means the scope for piracy is far smaller. There are those that can pirate the software for updates but at least they still have bought the hardware and have one genuine version. When there were early builds of OS X that could run on generic X86 hardware it spread rapdily and was widely available - if Apple did sell a generic OS X, you'd see exactly the same. Apple simply do not have the piracy problem Microsoft have, if Microsoft only sold their OS on Dell machines(and didn't work on any others) I doubt they would have so many hoops to jump through.

I do agree with you on activation though, it is a pain in the neck - I work in IT and we're meant to be moving from Win2k to Vista early next year and the activation aspect is a concern. In my previous job we had a small number of XP machines so they were just standard licenses and from time to time they were a real pain in the neck with activation.

John


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By BladeVenom on 3/22/2007 5:33:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Apple in an entirely different position though - you cannot use their software on a generic X86 machine which means the scope for piracy is far smaller.


They've gotten OS X to run on non-Apple computers. There's also piracy by running it on a virtual machine.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By alifbaa on 3/22/2007 5:57:52 PM , Rating: 2
I think his point still stands. The amount of piracy of OSX doesn't even begin to compare to that of Windows. The fact that it exists on some level is not the point. The point is that, for Windows, it exists on such a tremendous scale that M$ feels it's necessary to add extra protective measures.

Whether or not those measures are proper or effective is certainly a matter of debate though.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By noirsoft on 3/22/2007 12:46:57 PM , Rating: 2
Because Apple is a hardware company and makes their money on the hardware, not the software. Microsoft doesn't get any money for pure hardware sales and therefore has a definite business need to make sure that people who use their software do so legitimately.

Personally, I've never had any major problems with activation and think people who do are either exaggerating, lying or pirates. Even calling MS to Activate is a trivial and painless operation, which I have had to do on a few occasions as well.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By Tyhr on 3/22/2007 3:01:52 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Even calling MS to Activate is a trivial and painless operation, which I have had to do on a few occasions as well.

The very moment I have to pick up the phone (and obviously wait in stupid queues), it no longer is a trivial thing to me. Time is money. And my time is valuable, as well as my stress level.

If I had to phone my car company every single time I changed or added a new feature just to be allowed to turn it on - I'd freak.

Of course I'm also the guy that can't stand having to phone our internal HelpDesk that has been re-routed to a foreign country where English is not their first language, just to have my password reset. (Don't get me starting on the absurdity of this since we locally operate a HelpDesk to 3 other clients...) Please do not call that painless or trivial.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By nitrous9200 on 3/22/2007 9:45:50 PM , Rating: 2
MS activation changed to an automated system, and it takes less than 5 minutes to activate. (I found that pushing the numbers on the phone keypad was much quicker than saying it out loud.)


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By Seymourbbuts on 3/22/2007 11:28:14 PM , Rating: 2
That only works if you have only activated fewer than 3 times. Beyond that and you are transfered to a person that can sometimes speak great English, and other times cannot, to confirm that your copy of Windows is only installed on one computer and provide an explanation of why you are activating so many times.

I have a crap computer that I spent less than $400 on. Because it is so slow I am always tweaking it to get it to run just that much faster and I frequently crash my installations of Windows, which forces me to reinstall and reactivate.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By kmmatney on 3/24/2007 4:51:55 PM , Rating: 2
The automated system only worked once for me. I recently had to perform a "repair-install" on my machine, and I had to reactivate and talk to a person on the phone. As the pos above states, the automated system cannot be used all the time.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By mindless1 on 3/27/2007 12:50:14 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed, automated push-button activation does not always work. I've had to talk with MS rep even on plain vanilla Dell PC reinstallations.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By Locutus465 on 3/25/2007 2:30:38 PM , Rating: 2
Because beleive it or not, some ppl perfer windows for a variaty of reasons. Those people should be buying their OS's legitimitaly and activiating them though. Activation is designed to stop the casual pirate.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By Christopher1 on 3/25/2007 5:54:10 PM , Rating: 2
Which most piraters are NOT. They are usually people who are too poor to buy Windows legitimately and who are forced to buy it illegally.


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By osalcido on 3/27/2007 6:06:18 PM , Rating: 2
there are free alternatives... and you say pirates are so poor they cant afford 80 dollars for windows vista, huh? How did they pay for a computer that costs hundreds of dollars?


RE: Why, Activation, Why?
By FNG on 3/28/2007 4:10:06 AM , Rating: 2
I agree with using free alternatives as I do and I have a spare $80. However, when a fully functional computer can be put together for $180 (sans monitor), $80 for the OS is a pretty good chunk of change.


But can you download updates and MS software?
By Staples on 3/21/2007 11:40:13 PM , Rating: 2
When I bought Vista, I activated it the day after I installed it. I am not sure if I would have been able to download updates or MS software before the OS had been activated. I believe on XP it will not work because everything now has to validate the OS before installing anything.




By archcommus on 3/21/2007 11:50:20 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, I thought a non-activated version of Windows wasn't all that useful because you couldn't validate or get updates, and so the real challenge for hackers was to figure out a way to make a pirated version appear to be legitimately activated.


By Beany on 3/22/2007 3:49:18 AM , Rating: 2
You can still install all updates for Vista without it being activated.


By FITCamaro on 3/22/2007 7:41:37 AM , Rating: 2
While true if you go to Microsoft's website to update, if you simply wait for the automatic updates to detect what needs to be updated, even a non-activated copy of XP will allow the download and installation of all updates. Just be sure to remove the Windows Genuine Advantage updates.


By therealnickdanger on 3/22/2007 8:05:59 AM , Rating: 2
Even a copy of Windows XP that is exposed as being "pirated" will still automatically get all critical updates. Despite wanting to crush illegal use, they want to ensure that those who do use it illegally still have a solid-running machine. They wouldn't want them switching to Mac or Linux...


RE: But can you download updates and MS software?
By oneils on 3/22/2007 11:03:47 AM , Rating: 4
MS allows them to be updated so that they receive security updates. That way they won't spread viruses.