backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 171 comment(s) - last by Durrr.. on Mar 19 at 8:09 AM


Among the new features of Windows 7 will be exciting touch capabilities that will alows users to drag and resize windows with a flick of the fingers, similar to the iPhone's interface.  (Source: Gizmondo)
Microsoft looks to learn from the successes and failures of Vista to deliver its strongest OS yet

Windows Vista was supposed to usher in a new era for Windows operating systems, employing a stylish aero graphical user interface and offering many improvements over its previous version. 

However for all its hits, the OS has certainly had its misses.  Initial hardware support for the 64-bit home version was bad leading to multiple incompatibilities, while the more "user-safe" interface with its many prompts (which some don't realize can be disabled) left many annoyed.  Further, the multiple SKUs left many wondering what they were buying, though in Microsoft's defense, the software giant did document the differences between versions extensively online, and worked with retailers to provide this information.

The company was also slammed with a major class action suit, after its executives admitted lying to consumers about computers' "Vista readiness" under pressure from a hungry Intel looking to sell chipsets.  Said one executive, unhappily, "We set ourselves up."

For all its problems, though, Vista delivered a rather solid experience for the majority of users.  Its improved search features, improved office suite, and more interaction-friendly graphics interface have all pleased customers. 


Microsoft is pushing ahead strong on its plans to release its next generation operating system, Windows 7.  Whereas Vista took over 5 years to release -- XP released October '01, Vista's retail release was in January '07 -- Windows 7 will reach customers in a mere 3 years, according to Microsoft.  Leaks also reveal that the Redmond-based company sent a test version of Windows 7 known as Milestone 1 (M1) to select partners in January 2008.

In an email, a Microsoft spokesman, confirmed that 2010 was the correct Windows 7 date -- three years after the consumer Vista release.  He stated, "We are currently in the planning stages for Windows 7 and development is scoped to three years from Windows Vista Consumer GA. The specific release date will be determined once the company meets its quality bar for release."

Microsoft may have already reached Milestone 2 (M2) in the development, which it had projected to reach in March/April, though the company refused to comment on the progress.  Microsoft, under extended supervision by the U.S. government for past antitrust abuses, submitted a copy of Windows 7 to the Technical Committee – the group of technology experts appointed by the Department of Justice and the other plaintiffs in Microsoft's U.S. antitrust settlement. 

The committee released a status update on this examination.  The committee states, "In addition, the [Technical Committee] has begun to review Windows 7 itself.  Microsoft recently supplied the TC with a build of Windows 7, and is discussing TC testing going forward. The TC will conduct middleware-related tests on future builds of Windows 7."

The committee apparently shared an undisclosed issue they already found and would like Microsoft to fix. 

Microsoft has disclosed little about how Windows 7 builds on Windows Vista.  Bill Gates did state in an interview that it will provide revolutionary advances in voice recognition and other natural interfaces.  The OS will also interface with Windows Live Wave 3, the latest version of Microsoft's email/messaging/utility suite



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I don't understand this Apple crap
By pauldovi on 3/13/2008 3:43:37 PM , Rating: 4
Why is everything compared to Apple.

"Similar to the iPhone"

Well god damn, Apple isn't the first company with a touch sensitive LCD device.




RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Etsp on 3/13/2008 3:57:50 PM , Rating: 4
What would you prefer? That they compare it to Blackberries?
(If you don't get it, think fruits.)


RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By JoshuaBuss on 3/17/2008 12:56:10 AM , Rating: 2
I'm pretty tired of hearing about Apple as well. They're only big in mp3 player land, so if an article doesn't have to do with mp3 players or genuinely interesting new apple hardware I just don't understand why it's mentioned.

Marketshare-wise, it juts doesn't make sense to worry about apple that much. so what if a few people like their stuff. a few people REALLY like toshiba laptops or open-source OSes but we don't have to listen to it all the time.. >_<


By Pirks on 3/17/2008 3:23:08 AM , Rating: 1
Marketshare-wise, it just doesn't make sense to worry about those puny personal computers that much. So what if a few people like their stuff. A few people REALLY like those toy computers like Altair/Commodore/Sinclair/etc but we big IBM mainframe guys don't have to listen to them all the time. Let them babble about their puny "PC" toys to take over the market in future, of course everyone knows that market share is everything and we mainframe makers control the market, and will control it forever.

(C) some IBM internal talks from the last century


RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By UNCjigga on 3/18/08, Rating: -1
RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Pirks on 3/18/2008 11:44:21 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
HFS Plus is a crap filesystem that even older NTFS beats hands down for security and performance
The new Mac file system is ZFS, which is read only for now and has not been fully integrated into Mac OS X yet, it's in the form of the developer preview now. Unlike non-existent WinFS that never went further than another empty MS babble, ZFS is real, and it owns crappy NTFS easily (not that NTFS is crappy by itself, but compared to ZFS it's a pathetic joke)


By UNCjigga on 3/18/2008 11:52:18 AM , Rating: 2
I don't care about unreleased features. If its not in release, it doesn't exist. Everyone thought ZFS would make it in to Leopard, but it didn't. Until it comes standard on every new Mac, Apple is beat on the filesystem front.


By djkrypplephite on 3/18/2008 4:26:34 PM , Rating: 2
He uses the iPhone as an example because that's what most people will associate with as a common multi-touch piece of equipment. Stop with the Apple hate, get over it.


By napalmjack on 3/13/2008 3:58:02 PM , Rating: 2
Huzzah, good sir.


By beyazkeyat on 3/13/2008 4:05:55 PM , Rating: 5
Maybe because the article was written by an Apple fanboy ;)

Just saying.


RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Pirks on 3/13/08, Rating: 0
RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Brigandier on 3/13/2008 5:20:11 PM , Rating: 5
You've been making that comparison a lot lately, but I don't think it really holds water. It's more like Diesel vs. Petrol engines, as there can be very svelte Windows PC's. It's just a difference in preference, anyway, you are not luxury for buying a Mac, you are luxurious because you spent a good deal of money on a computer. Macs are not inherently better, nor are they worse than Windows PC's, they are just different.


RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Pirks on 3/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Brigandier on 3/13/2008 5:55:29 PM , Rating: 5
Or you can just get a Cadillac with all those features, even though it is still GM. Or perhaps you want a Corvette, a sexy powerful sports car that is quite fast. You have that thinness and power...to surf the web and watch movies? You can get a very nice WIndows 17 incher and actually enjoy games, and just as much performance as that Mac. Sure, some other features aren't up to snuff, but Corvettes were never meant for taking the family out. It's a trade-off, just because you see a back lit keyboard as the be-all end-all trait for luxury, does not mean others do as well. Great, we get you like Macs, but that doesn't mean they are superior to all Windows products.


RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Pirks on 3/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Brigandier on 3/13/2008 6:26:39 PM , Rating: 5
WHo is babbling about Crysis? I didn't even mention it, actually. And Falcon Northwest(A niche maker, for sure) makes a very solid gaming laptop with car quality paint and the bells and whistles to play most games, all with a 4-5 hour battery. A niche product for sure, but no more niche than a 17 inch $2800 laptop, being realistic the most you see people having is the 13 Inch Macbook(my sister even has one), which is a very niche product. I have never said Apple is bad or sub par and Windows better, I've just said Macs are not the only luxury computer. And anyone that spends $2800 dollars on a computer, be it Mac or PC, has probably just purchased himself a "luxury" computer, and they've probably purchased it according to their definition of luxury.

I am no fanboy, I am a realist, Mac is not the only luxury, and it is not luxury by default, that is all I am saying.


RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Pirks on 3/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: I don't understand this Apple crap
By Brigandier on 3/13/2008 6:57:26 PM , Rating: 3
A 17 Inch 7 pound notebook is not ultra-portable, it may be sexy and powerful, but ultra-portable it is not.