backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 24 comment(s) - last by pugz3d.. on Jun 4 at 12:15 AM

Technology is coming soon to netbooks, cell phones, and more

The internet's richest content is heavily driven by Adobe's Flash, a platform allowing rich graphics and interaction.  The mobile community, though, from netbooks to cell phones has limited to non-existent support for Flash.  For netbook users, they can use Flash, but it can be sluggish for lack of proper hardware acceleration.  On smart phones, many users have no access to Flash.  In short, users aren't able to take full advantage of internet on the go.

A new partnership between NVIDIA and Adobe seeks to change that, bringing hardware acceleration of Flash to mobile GPUs.  The pair looks to deploy the technology in upcoming netbooks, tablets, and mobile phones.

The technology will be supported by NVIDIA's Tegra (the company's smart phone platform), and likely its Ion platform (netbooks) as well.  A joint press release describes, "Adobe Flash Player will be accelerated across the range of NVIDIA processors, including NVIDIA Tegra™, enabling users to enjoy uncompromised Web browsing, full H.264 video playback and rich, consistent Flash technology based content any time, any place and on any platform. "

Adobe is also partnering with 25 industry leaders to help develop standards and technology to provide a consistent deployment of Flash across desktop and mobile platforms.  The new organization is called the Open Screen Project. 

David Wadhwani, general manager and vice president, Platform Business Unit at Adobe, cheers the new partnership with NVIDIA, stating, "NVIDIA’s unique expertise makes it an ideal partner for Adobe to integrate cutting-edge graphics and video acceleration into the Adobe Flash Platform, benefiting all types of devices.  Flash Player will leverage the power of the GPU to provide a rich, desktop-compatible Web experience on a wide range of devices."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

All I can say is....
By oTAL (blog) on 6/2/2009 12:41:44 PM , Rating: 5
DIE FLASH DIE!
OH WHY WON'T YOU DIE!!!!

I hope that HTML 5 can finally release us from plugin hell!
Disgustingly insecure and hard to maintain piece of $%&#!




RE: All I can say is....
By phatboye on 6/2/2009 12:54:59 PM , Rating: 5
HTML 5 is nice but the few websites that I've seen with HTML 5 content all had the videos encoded in OGG Theora which cannot match many of the other proprietary codecs out there.

The flash client plugin isn't as bad as it used to be and is slowly getting better but now it faces competition from Silverlight and HTML 5. If Adobe really wants to say competitive they should open source the flash-plugin client or help with the development of already established open sourced clients and just charge for the flash creation software. As silverlight already has a open source client (monolight) and HTML doesn't require a plugin.


RE: All I can say is....
By chromal on 6/2/2009 1:26:58 PM , Rating: 1
Unless HTML5 includes AJAX, you're not likely to see Adobe Flash go away any time soon.


RE: All I can say is....
By Etsp on 6/2/2009 3:43:18 PM , Rating: 3
What does AJAX have to do with Flash? AJAX is based on javascript....


RE: All I can say is....
By omnicronx on 6/2/2009 7:00:08 PM , Rating: 3
More like what does AJAX have to do with HTML5.. (or HTML for that matter). One is a scripting language, the other is a markup language, you will never see them combined.


RE: All I can say is....
By InternetGeek on 6/2/2009 10:38:12 PM , Rating: 2
hmmmm... HTML is made 'dynamic' by using manipulating the DOM using Javascript. In a way they complement each other. More exactly, AJAX refers to using XML, CSS, HTML and the DOM to have a web application behave like a client one (windows one if you like).

What's he's referring to is to some of the features found in HTML 5 that overlap to some of the features found in Flash or Silverlight. As a developer, you could achieve the same effect using either one (including HTML 5 once it's out).


RE: All I can say is....
By InternetGeek on 6/2/2009 10:44:21 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
AJAX refers to using XML, CSS, HTML and the DOM


Should be "AJAX refers to using XML, CSS, HTML, the DOM and Javascript"...

Wiki both terms (Ajax, Html 5) for more info ;)


RE: All I can say is....
By jconan on 6/2/2009 11:43:21 PM , Rating: 2
I thought Ajax was a household cleaning agent of sort after all these years... Thanks for the enlightenment. j/k


RE: All I can say is....
By myocardia on 6/2/2009 1:34:19 PM , Rating: 3
I'll install install Adobe's Flash on one of my systems right after I've installed every known virus. I happen to like viruses ALOT more than Flash. At least they're quasi-useful.


RE: All I can say is....
By theslug on 6/2/2009 1:59:46 PM , Rating: 2
It would also be nice if they fixed the horizontal tearing issue.


RE: All I can say is....
By invidious on 6/2/2009 2:32:31 PM , Rating: 2
I was not aware that flash was such a point of anger for people. Dare I ask why anybody cares?


RE: All I can say is....
By sc3252 on 6/2/2009 2:52:29 PM , Rating: 2
Is being a slow piece of crap not enough?


RE: All I can say is....
By myocardia on 6/2/2009 3:52:23 PM , Rating: 2
Flash equals Apple's version of Java, but carried out even more poorly. Anymore questions?


RE: All I can say is....
By myocardia on 6/2/2009 4:34:30 PM , Rating: 2
That last sentence should have read "Any more questions?"


RE: All I can say is....
By B3an on 6/3/2009 8:14:42 AM , Rating: 2
Hardly, Flash is by far one of most creative web based techologies out there. You can do literally anything with it - games, apps, video, sound, and unlike many other alternatives its a lot more easy and FUN to make all this stuff, any web developer that uses Flash will tell you this. Yes it needs it's security improving, but it's a superior product which is why so many sites use it.


RE: All I can say is....
By akugami on 6/2/2009 3:42:16 PM , Rating: 2
I don't like Flash either but some sites require it. For all the rest...Flasblock plugin for Firefox...where the hell is our 64 bit Flash?


How's this for an idea?
By theapparition on 6/2/2009 12:50:24 PM , Rating: 4
How about Adobe partners with someone who can make a 64bit version of Flash.




RE: How's this for an idea?
By AEvangel on 6/2/2009 2:21:36 PM , Rating: 4
Amen to that....I mean it's not like 64 bit OS have been out for any length of time.


who cares?
By omnicronx on 6/2/2009 6:54:05 PM , Rating: 3
I really don't see the point. Aside from scaling, by design flash will never be able to use hardware acceleration aside from full screen video. Well Silverlight pretty much already has the scaling down without true hardware acceleration, so really whats the point? There are better ways adobe could achieve the same thing without hardware acceleration.

Furthermore without support from Intel and ATI, this means absolutely nothing. Web developers are not going to start streaming rich content that only people with Nvidia cards can use.

Flash is a dying, and there is nothing Adobe is going to be able to do about it.




RE: who cares?
By ET on 6/3/2009 12:39:42 AM , Rating: 2
You're obviously missing the point (since you mentioned Intel and ATI). This is aimed at ARM based netbooks. They have a lot less power than desktops (and probably less than Atom based devices), so would benefit from this. A lot of the web has Flash, like it or not, and these devices require it to succeed.

As for supporting other acceleration, nobody said this won't happen. Qualcomm (which bought ATI's mobile graphics unit) is also said to be working with software developers, including Adobe.


Finally
By dmark07 on 6/2/2009 12:21:25 PM , Rating: 3
Im surprised it has taken this long for adobe to realize they need to offload to the GPU. Even on a more powerful machine, some flash videos when run in full screen will have issues. Hopefully AMD joins in or can benefit from this as well. Can't wait to watch newgrounds on my Mogul or even biteycastle full screen on my old P4 toshiba.




Silverlight already has this
By InternetGeek on 6/2/2009 4:40:32 PM , Rating: 3
Wonder why he didn't mention it




.
By sprockkets on 6/2/2009 5:00:46 PM , Rating: 2
Kinda funny, that I can watch basic flash stuff and games on my Cowon D2. Homestarrunner works OK on it too.

Not useful on that model since it isn't an internet device, and it doesn't do flash video. But still, there are some parts of flash I don't mind.

Funny part is, with HTML5 and Theora/Vorbis in an OGG container video works like crap on Windows with 100% cpu usage, but OK in Linux. Doesn't really matter, because both suck compared to running the same video in smplayer.
FF 3.5B4 should just embed mplayer into the browser, and end up using only 24% cpu to view videos.




By pugz3d on 6/4/2009 12:15:21 AM , Rating: 2
I know little about Flash under the hood, but am a lukewarm fan of Adobe overall. It does seem to be quickly moving up the ranks of the unfavorables. I was just curious if someone who isn't a Flash lover wanted to elaborate more on what should be used instead and why. Also, I see AIR is bringing some interesting apps to Linux and Windows, is it going anywhere?

Finally #PDFDOCXPSODF_FAIL. We got TXT for text and RTF for basics, can we get 1 damn standard for the "moderately advanced" category of word processing that makes up a majority of the market? PDFs are near the top of my list for hated files. http://www.twitpic.com/6kx15 (Playing with Paint.NET as my graphic editing is pretty meager.)




"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov














botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki