Print 27 comment(s) - last by nvpyyasnzqya.. on Jul 30 at 9:22 AM

AT&T is receiving support from one U.S. state regulator and 11 state attorneys general who are for the merger

AT&T has been working to acquire Deutsche Telekom AG's T-Mobile USA in a $39 billion deal, but the U.S. Senate's antitrust committee recently expressed doubts in regards to the merger. Now, AT&T is receiving support on the matter from one U.S. state regulator and 11 state attorneys general who are for the merger.

Senator Herb Kohl (D-Wisc.), chairman of the antitrust committee, as well as Representative Anna Eshoo (D-Calif., 14th District), chairwoman of the House Energy and Commerce Communications and Technology Subcommittee, Congressman Edward Markey (D-Mass., 7th District), and Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich., 14th District) are among those opposing the AT&T/T-Mobile merger. They openly expressed their opinions in a letter to the Department of Justice (DOP) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) saying that such a merger would kill competition and hike prices for customers.

"We believe that AT&T's acquisition of T-Mobile would be a troubling backward step in federal public policy -- a retrenchment from nearly two decades of promoting competition and open markets to acceptance of a duopoly in the wireless marketplace," they wrote. "Such industry consolidation could reduce competition and increase consumer costs at a time our country can least afford it."

AT&T responded to the U.S. Senate committee, saying that these opinions are "inconsistent with antitrust law, is shared by few others, and ignores the many positive benefits and numerous supporters of the transaction." AT&T also mentioned that the merger would help it expand a quicker service to more people.

Now, it looks like AT&T has acquired more supporters to help push this merger along. The Louisiana Public Service Commission, which regulates transportation and public utilities in the state, voted 4-1 to approve the merger. In addition, another 11 state attorneys general wrote a letter to the DOP and FCC asking for merger-specific conditions that protect competition as well as public interest, yet doesn't delay the merger.

The 11 state attorneys general supporting the merger are Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Utah, Mississippi, Michigan, North Dakota, South Dakota, West Virginia and Wyoming.

"Their call for federal regulators to expeditiously review and approve the merger further builds on our unprecedented nationwide support from federal, state and local elected officials, national unions, non-profit organizations and high-tech and venture capital firms," said Wayne Watts, AT&T's senior executive vice president and general counsel.

If the merger were to go through, 80 percent of the U.S. wireless market would be consumed by two companies -- Verizon Wireless and AT&T/T-Mobile. Verizon has not mentioned whether it is for or against the merger, but chief executive Dan Mead has said that he is "not concerned" with it. Analysts believe Verizon could benefit from the merger by picking up subscribers during the potentially frustrating period of transition during the merging of both companies.

Sprint, on the other hand, has made its opinion clear -- it is against the merger mainly for competitive reasons, and has also said that bring both companies together will "stifle innovation" in the wireless market.

Ultimately, the choice is up to the Justice Department, which will conduct an antitrust review, and the FCC, which will decide if the merge is best for the public.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By icanhascpu on 7/28/2011 10:51:36 PM , Rating: 5
Cant wait for the higher prices lower caps and smaller fineprint! Thank you law makers!

RE: Sweet!
By Myrandex on 7/28/11, Rating: 0
RE: Sweet!
By chick0n on 7/29/2011 12:12:16 AM , Rating: 1
I just buy a tri-band 3g phone or even better, a quad band 3g phone and I'm good. Like the X10 my bro is using and the N8 that I'm using. What frequency issue ? It's the same exact crap back in the "2g" phone days.

I understand you like the merger especially when you have been enjoying shitty service, ultra high prices and oh wait, did I just said Shitty service? Or did I say "it simply doesn't f-king work?"

RE: Sweet!
By christojojo on 7/29/2011 6:46:44 AM , Rating: 2
Can you please explain in the long run how the lack of competition ever gives the consumer a true advantage?

I can't remember a single (admittedly a cursory look back)merger that did what we were promised.

RE: Sweet!
By Targon on 7/29/2011 8:31:23 AM , Rating: 1
It is a given right now that T-mobile is going to go away, if the merger goes through or not. It is just a matter of when, and what happens to the assets of the company. So, it's not a matter of the merger reducing competition at this point, and is just helping firm up the competition between Verizon and AT&T.

Remember, T-mobile has towers in places AT&T does not, so that alone makes the merger a positive thing for AT&T customers. For T-mobile, which does not have coverage in many many places, those customers will suddenly be on a large network, and as long as ALL the towers are used by AT&T, the T-mobile customers will not experience any reduction in signal strength or anything negative there.

RE: Sweet!
By sprockkets on 7/29/2011 9:02:35 AM , Rating: 5
Well, if TMobile is going away, Att can buy it for pennies on the dollar when and if it ever happens.

Until then, those "regulators" can shove an iphone up their ass.

RE: Sweet!
By quiksilvr on 7/29/2011 9:04:32 AM , Rating: 2
Except the extra fees and ball constricting data caps. Do you honestly think they will keep the same prices for those not in a contract with T-Mobile?

Right now we have the Even More Plus family plan that gives us 1500 minutes and unlimited texting for three people for $85 a month and no contract ties. A similar plan with AT&T would be $110 and requires a 2 year contract.

So pretty much, we'll be switching over to Sprint or Virgin Mobile when the change occurs.

RE: Sweet!
By aharris02 on 7/29/2011 2:29:43 PM , Rating: 2
You seem to exclude the fact that T-Mobile will come out vastly richer if the deal doesn't go through.

If they can't regain their standing with a $3-6B infusion of cash, they have bigger problems.

RE: Sweet!
By gorehound on 7/29/2011 8:05:39 AM , Rating: 2
more people in government who have been bought off by ATT.make sure not to vote for them again.

RE: Sweet!
By atlmann10 on 7/29/2011 10:26:39 AM , Rating: 5
$11,690,000 is what At&t has donated to US members of various political parties in the house, senate, and state governments in 2011.

Here is a link:

You may have to copy and paste it. Net neutrality has basically been hog tied so it impacts nothing much, when this At&t t-mobile thing goes through there will be 2 major providers of cellular communication in the US basically.

Americans just blindly follow there chosen parties politicians. In Europe where capitalism is actually existent in the market, and you can grab home internet of fiber, TV, and a home phone that provides approximately 4 times the bandwidth of an American home for half of the price you would pay in an american city.

On the cellular side of things everything in Europe is also half the price with unlimited data, minutes, and texting from roughly 20 different providers.

America in all reality is dead and owned by mainly 2 political parties and there rhetoric, everything not run by them and fanatics generally is owned by China.

RE: Sweet!
By Gzus666 on 7/29/2011 10:29:55 AM , Rating: 2
If we can convince China that they used to be cool, we may still have a chance to pay later.

By chick0n on 7/29/2011 12:18:25 AM , Rating: 2
Now, AT&T is receiving support on the matter from one U.S. state regulator and 11 state attorneys general who are for the merger.

You mean

Now, AT&T is receiving support on the matter "AFTER" they "bribe ..." grrr oops I mean they paid those lobbyist to "donate" crap load of money to one U.S. state regulator and 11 state attorneys general who are for the merger ?

It's funny that when every f-king body on the street is screaming on this merger, these "regulators/lawmakers" just don't "see" these anger and instead they said "hey, it's actually ok to merge !"

RE: Corrections
By Mathos on 7/29/2011 2:28:10 AM , Rating: 2
In all honesty, if our government keeps going the way it is, they'll piss off enough people to cause a full on revolution. At which point they will be removed from their positions. They're more worried about representing the views of their parties now than they are about representing the views of the people who elected them.

RE: Corrections
By gorehound on 7/29/2011 8:06:58 AM , Rating: 3
Viva Le Revolotion !!!

RE: Corrections
By SniperWulf on 7/29/2011 8:56:42 AM , Rating: 2
Kicking people out of office is only the start. We gotta abolish this lobbying crap too. All those former politicians will do is get a job at some lobbying firm.

RE: Corrections
By Gzus666 on 7/29/2011 10:46:14 AM , Rating: 2
Let's be honest, if a revolution of that sort actually happens, the mob will just kill people, not remove them.

RE: Corrections
By theslug on 7/29/2011 2:51:03 PM , Rating: 2
I really want to know why lobbying aka bribery is even legal. Shouldn't the government be 100% supportive of the people of the nation and not of companies? Any politician that accepts bribes from a company to see things their way, instead of what's best for people in general, is corrupt and should be voted out.

What I also don't get is where you draw the line between lobbying and actual bribery (in the strictest definition of the word), because it seems they are basically the same. Except one's legal and one isn't.

RE: Corrections
By geddarkstorm on 7/29/2011 3:02:04 PM , Rating: 2
There is often a great disparity between how things should be and how things are.

Perfect time to go to T-Mobile
By Stiggalicious on 7/29/2011 10:32:40 AM , Rating: 2
My contract with Sprint ended at the perfect time, that's for sure. I'm going to T-Mobile this weekend.
T-Mobile's new "Value Plan" (which essentially gives you just a SIM card) is $70 a month for 1000 minutes plus unlimited texting for four lines (AT&T would be $120 or $130), and I just bought a brand-new Sidekick LX 2009 for $70 and it does everything I need very well.
All free phones nowadays are really terrible or require an expensive data plan. $15 per month times 2 years is $360. I'll just buy a good, older phone that doesn't have 4G or Facebook apps or built-in Youtube. I don't want any of those anyways, so why pay money for it? I want to be able to have clear conversations and to be able to type things easily (and nothing beats the Sidekick's keyboard).

If T-Mobile merges with AT&T, then I get to talk to more people for free while still paying little to nothing for my service. If they don't merge, then I still get to talk a ton on the GSM network (oh I am glad the days of roaming charges are over).

RE: Perfect time to go to T-Mobile
By Gzus666 on 7/29/2011 10:39:10 AM , Rating: 2
I have never in my life seen someone excited to become a part of AT&T. Are you sure you aren't a robot/AT&T shill?

RE: Perfect time to go to T-Mobile
By cjohnson2136 on 7/29/2011 11:46:21 AM , Rating: 2
Roaming charges...I am on Sprint and have never got roaming charges. I have never heard of anyone getting roaming charges so WTF are you talking about?

RE: Perfect time to go to T-Mobile
By Gzus666 on 7/29/2011 11:49:58 AM , Rating: 2
As I insinuated, he is probably a robot/AT&T shill. BURN THE WITCH!

Don't look now, but...
By The Insolent One on 7/29/2011 4:48:18 AM , Rating: 2
Our country is Fcuked.

RE: Don't look now, but...
By Gzus666 on 7/29/2011 10:19:26 AM , Rating: 2
Nope, it is awesome, what are you talking about? We are doing so well, things are getting better. Hey, look what those celebrities are doing! Steroids in baseball, look at that bird over there! America, fcuk yea!

By foolsgambit11 on 7/29/2011 8:04:24 PM , Rating: 2
In addition, another 11 state attorneys general wrote a letter to the DOP and FCC asking for merger-specific conditions that protect competition as well as public interest, yet doesn't delay the merger.

Of course, the question is whether the government would actually enforce those merger-specific conditions. The federal government has always seemed pretty weak at enforcement. Writing regulations is easy, but ensuring they are followed is hard, and too expensive and time consuming to carry out on just one company.

pure greed
By waddup on 7/30/2011 8:59:21 AM , Rating: 2
their service is already in throttling mode ! they know the 5% will grow to 95%

By nvpyyasnzqya on 7/30/11, Rating: 0
"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki