backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by BruceLeet.. on Apr 23 at 4:26 AM

Updated software at hubs offers 7.2Mbps download speeds

AT&T scored a coup in the mobile phone market when it locked up the exclusive contract for the Apple iPhone and the subsequent iPhone 3G. The iPhone is the most popular smartphone around and continues to win the carrier new customers.

Telephony Online reports that AT&T is currently working to upgrade its existing 3G network to handle double the current peak speeds and more concurrent users. Currently, the AT&T 3G network is capable of a maximum download speeds of 3.6Mbps.

AT&T is upgrading central stations with new software that will double that peak download speed from 3.6Mbps to 7.2Mbps. AT&T has a pair of test networks running today and is certifying devices for operating on the enhanced 3G network.

With 4G on the near horizon, AT&T is also looking at moving speeds higher with the coming implementation of evolved-HSPA or HSPA+ that could triple the peak download speeds of the new upgraded network. HSPA can theoretically support speeds of 14.4Mb/s over a 5MHz downlink, but the technology to enable those speeds wasn't available when HSPA first launched.

The next step would seem to be moving the current 3G network up to the max 14.4Mbps speed, but AT&T says it will not do that. The reason is that there have been technical issues surrounding implementing 14.4Mbps speeds on HSPA and HSPA+ is ready to go and offers peak download speeds of 21Mbps. It makes little sense to upgrade to 14.4Mbps when the company could just as easily go to 21 Mbps.

AT&T's Scott McElroy said that in addition to updating peak download speeds on its network, the company is also adding more capacity to support more users at the faster data speeds. The new backend work may mean that previously unserved areas can get access to 3G networks. That may prove to be the added kick AT&T needs to move even more iPhone 3G devices.

AT&T's main competitor Verizon Wireless plans to begin launching its 4G network later this year.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Gee Thanks
By mofo3k on 4/21/2009 12:04:13 PM , Rating: 3
Thanks a lot for this upgrade AT&T.

Now if you even just roll out regular 3G to my area than maybe I can get excited about this. I have a feeling this will make it take longer for me to get 3G in eastern Iowa unfortunately.




RE: Gee Thanks
By mcnabney on 4/21/2009 12:54:04 PM , Rating: 2
Hasn't Verizon been selling 3G in eastern Iowa for years now? Oh, let me guess, you have an iPhone. Never mind.


RE: Gee Thanks
By Smartless on 4/21/2009 2:37:31 PM , Rating: 3
Damn he's in one of those annoying deadzone commercials.


RE: Gee Thanks
By quiksilvr on 4/21/2009 5:07:20 PM , Rating: 2
So this explains why iPhone is limited to 3.6 Mbps. I always thought it was because they purposefully did it so that when the third iteration comes out they'll do some bullsh|t like "FASTER 3G, OOOOOOH!"


RE: Gee Thanks
By crleap on 4/21/2009 1:39:11 PM , Rating: 2
I'd be happy with reliable 2G in my city of 48k. I can't wait till other carriers support the iphone so I can jump ship to a company who supports... well... a signal.


RE: Gee Thanks
By GotDiesel on 4/21/2009 2:56:15 PM , Rating: 2
AND remove the download cap.. :)


RE: Gee Thanks
By Targon on 4/22/2009 6:28:23 AM , Rating: 2
You missed an obvious point, that when AT&T puts the new 4G equipment in the field, they will move the current 3G stuff they are replacing to other areas, so you won't get 4G coverage, but you will get the 3G coverage in YOUR area as the cities are converted to 4G.

It would be like upgrading the components in your computer. The parts you are replacing won't get sold or thrown out, they will go into the other slower computers you have in the house to make THEM faster. This makes the main machine(s) faster, and it ends up being an improvement for twice the number of people.

I live in one of those areas that gets 3G at home, but often lose it when I am out. I run into problems when it switches into and out of a 3G area, so I have left 3G support turned off. Now, when AT&T upgrades the coverage around my home with 4G equipment, I suspect that the neighboring areas will finally get 3G support. Since no one has a 4G device yet, those currently with 3G devices will find service has improved and 3G is now the normal service type.

Of course, then I get to worry about if the Palm Pre for AT&T(when it finally comes out) will support the new 4G or not, but I won't be able to test until at least January of 2010 when the Sprint exclusive contract goes away.


Latency!
By gevorg on 4/21/2009 2:20:22 PM , Rating: 2
The 3.6Mbps is fine, AT&T should focus on reducing the latency/response times instead.




RE: Latency!
By bbomb on 4/21/2009 4:43:50 PM , Rating: 2
Hell I get a grand total of 600k ish download speeds on current 3G. They cant even get us to the speed of the current 3G and want to make it faster to a limit we cant even come close to touching.


You think 3G sucks?
By SnakeBlitzken on 4/21/2009 3:28:24 PM , Rating: 2
Try working on the Edge network. I'd rather they expand the coverage area first.




RE: You think 3G sucks?
By BruceLeet on 4/23/2009 4:26:18 AM , Rating: 2
Try CDMA, Analog.

We don't have Edge, or any type of G


Hmm
By StevoLincolnite on 4/21/2009 12:03:02 PM , Rating: 2
I'm guessing that 7.2mbps speed is the "Theoretical" maximum achieved on the network? In other words if you are the only person connected to the tower while standing under it?

Here in Australia Telstra launched it's 21mbps Wireless 3G Broadband in March, and I was getting 8mbps down according to the speed test, great speed and coverage, just a pity about the pricing.

The other Ironic thing is that Sol Trujillo was the CEO of Telstra and was an American who rolled that network out, with very little issues, great coverage (UMTS 850mhz) and good speeds, Pity that wasn't replicated over in the states by the sounds of things (Minus the price).




Well thats nice
By RjBass on 4/21/2009 9:17:40 PM , Rating: 2
It's great they wanna roll out faster speeds in certain markets, but how about getting anything at all to some markets and reliability to all markets?

Check this blog post i wrote a couple months ago about AT&T's 3G service. http://www.eggxpert.com/blogs/rj_systems/archive/2...




AT&T 14mb/s service
By FishTankX on 4/22/2009 5:58:03 AM , Rating: 2
Announcing our new 14mb/s service!

14mb/s! So you can hit your download cap in 45 minutes instead of 3 hours!




ROFL @ AT&T's 3G
By chick0n on 4/21/09, Rating: -1
RE: ROFL @ AT&T's 3G
By Mojo the Monkey on 4/21/2009 2:26:52 PM , Rating: 3
If these companies had to compete with the kind of population density that you find in Hong Kong alone, the infrastructure would be much better developed. You cant compare the two. Its very costly to roll out this equipment over large distances in order to cover the same amount of people.


RE: ROFL @ AT&T's 3G
By xti on 4/21/2009 2:35:03 PM , Rating: 5
stop making sense.


RE: ROFL @ AT&T's 3G
By chick0n on 4/21/09, Rating: 0
RE: ROFL @ AT&T's 3G
By 9nails on 4/21/2009 9:30:25 PM , Rating: 2
Coverage is important to the carrier. They're not going to put 21 Mbps speeds in areas where only the cows roam.

In Hong Kong, humans are densely packed into a city where a company can profit from a hundred cell towers. So they can afford higher speeds because the population will be attracted.

In the States, you need several hundred towers to reach the same amount of population. So a company can't afford to put out the blazing fast speeds on each tower that you see in Hong Kong because the money isn't returned on investment.

Coverage and speed are related in this respect.


"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki