backtop


Print 8 comment(s) - last by cditty.. on Jul 15 at 7:05 PM

AT&T may not be the biggest LTE network, but it is determined to be the fastest

When it comes to LTE coverage AT&T, Inc. (T) has been a bit behind its archrival Verizon Wireless (co-owned by Verizon Communications, Inc. (VZ) and Vodafone Group Plc (LON:VOD)), which happens to be the nation's largest network.  AT&T has about 300 cities covered; Verizon Wireless has 500 cities covered.

But AT&T is the fastest LTE network.  In recent testing by TechHive, AT&T averaged 13.2/6.5 Mbps versus 9.6/5.5 Mbps for Verizon Wireless.  And it's spending big to try to surge ahead of Verizon in coverage while maintaining its speed lead.

AT&T teased this week that it will make a major announcement on Tuesday, July 16.

One possibility is that AT&T will announce voice-over-LTE.  Current voice communications on all the major American carriers are ferried over older HSPA networks.  Pushing those signals to LTE will allow for less compression and/or more noise reduction, improving call quality.

A second possibility -- seemingly even more likely -- is that AT&T will announce concrete plans for its Advanced LTE rollout.  Advanced LTE promises speeds of up to 1.5 Gbps (in theory), greatly speeding up downloads and data traffic (helping you to hit your cap that much sooner!).

Since 2011 AT&T has promised to unleash advanced LTE (also known as second generation LTE or LTE-advanced) on the market by the end of 2013, with a broader rollout in 2014.

LTE tower
AT&T has promised to roll out advanced LTE for some time. [Image Source: Wind River Blog]

Hardware support for advanced LTE will hit the market in the next couple months courtesy of Qualcomm, Inc. (QCOM) whose Snapdragon 800 has an on-die LTE-advanced modem.

Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KSC:005930) has already released a variant of the Galaxy S IV that's rolling out in South Korea that has a Snapdragon 800 on board.  Samsung's domestic arch-rival LG Electronics Inc. (KSC:066570) -- currently the second largest Android phonemaker after Samsung -- is also preparing to release a Snapdragon 800 handset, the Optimus G2 (which may be rebranded as the Optimus G Pro in the U.S.).  That phone is expected to air at an August 7 launch event in New York City -- which may hint at when AT&T is planning to flip the switch on its second generation LTE network.
 
LG Optimus G Pro
The Optimus G will soon received a Snapdragon 800 upgrade.
 
Last, but not least, Sony Corp. (TYO:6758) has announced that its Xperia Z Ultra -- also Snapdragon 800 equipped -- will launch in Q3 2013.

Source: ComputerWorld



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

My Guess
By bah12 on 7/10/2013 1:51:08 PM , Rating: 2
New and improved lower data caps, you know to "help" protect the normal user from all the evil high data users....

God I hate the obvious anti-competivie coersion going on right now with data caps.




RE: My Guess
By stm1185 on 7/10/2013 2:28:03 PM , Rating: 4
Yeah without significantly higher data caps the value in even doubling the download speed of 4g is suspect.

Cool I can stream BluRay quality 1080p to my phone without WiFi, oh crap I just used up my data cap in 15min...


RE: My Guess
By wolrah on 7/12/2013 9:53:14 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Cool I can stream BluRay quality 1080p to my phone without WiFi, oh crap I just used up my data cap in 15min...


Ugh, this. I get so angry at AT&T's advertising these days because they specifically focus on streaming TV or movies, yet you can't do that without paying $rape to big blue.


LTE
By EnzoFX on 7/10/2013 2:45:26 PM , Rating: 2
Do those test take into account T-Mobile? I thought they were getting better speeds, where there is coverage =P.




RE: LTE
By Labotomizer on 7/10/2013 3:22:28 PM , Rating: 2
I have poor signal in my office and I'm currently getting 26 down and 9 up. I've been on the road between SA and Austin while someone else was driving and hit 30/14 on my hotspot using my tablet. That's all on Verizon. ATT is about the same but that's because SA is one of ATT's strongest cities. We were one of the first two with their LTE.


RE: LTE
By HrilL on 7/11/2013 4:19:15 PM , Rating: 2
Here in Santa Barbara, CA. We got LTE a couple of months ago on At&t. Verizon has been here for about a year longer with LTE . When it first came out my coworkers were getting about 7Mbps/2Mbps on Verizon. Now they barely get 3.5Mbps/1Mbps. While At&t just rolled out LTE and probably has less LTE phones in the area. I get about 20Mbps/7Mbps on average the best speed test I got 32Mbps/12Mbps.

At&t is faster in areas where they have coverage they didn't expand that coverage like Verizon has. If you go on a trip up the 101 Verizon will have LTE most of the way it seems while At&t will have HSPA+ in some areas and HSPA in others and there is even a stretch that roams onto someone else's network so no data at all but calls won't drop. In other areas they only have Edge still. So if you were to go on a road trip and need good internet Verizon is the way to go but if you're mostly in town At&t has the better service.


Speeds
By btc909 on 7/10/2013 4:29:34 PM , Rating: 2
Slower data speeds tie up your towers. Get the data sent and received as quickly as possible. I do agree dump HSPA, and eventually get rid of the data caps. Customers can only do some much on your data network.

I have noticed at peak times Verizon LTE is just plain slow.




Call Quality
By cditty on 7/15/2013 7:05:55 PM , Rating: 2
They really need to work on the audio quality of their calls. Verizon absolutely kills them. My Verizon phone sounds like a land line. My AT&T phone sounds like a garbled digital mess. Both 4G, both have coverage, but it is night and day in my area (Northeast Louisiana) in call quality.




"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki