backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 53 comment(s) - last by OvErHeAtInG.. on Aug 26 at 9:25 PM

Without further ado, ATI's fall refresh in the flesh complete with new leaked benchmarks

ATI is set to introduce its new fall graphics card refresh in the form of the Radeon X1950XTX, Radeon X1950 CrossFire and Radeon X1900XT 256MB tomorrow, August 23rd, 2006. The new Radeon X1950 series cards will have 650 MHz core clocks as the previous X1900XTX graphics cards. Memory has been upgraded to GDDR4 clocked at 2 GHz instead of the previous 1.45 GHz on the Radeon X1900XTX. ATI’s Radeon X1900XT 256MB will also launch the same day and fill the void between the Radeon X1900GT and Radeon X1900XT 512MB.

All three new Radeon cards will have the same 48-pixel shaders as previous X1900 cards. The new cards are also fully HDCP compliant too. Only the Radeon X1950 series cards will receive ATI’s new quieter heat-pipe cooler while the Radeon X1900XT 256MB retains the same cooler as the Radeon X1900XT 512MB. Pricing on the new cards are quite competitive at $449 for the Radeon X1950XTX and Radeon X1950 CrossFire and $279 for the Radeon X1900XT 256MB. Availability of the Radeon X1950 series and Radeon X1900XT 256MB is expected in mid September, particular around September 14th.

DailyTech previously came across vendor benchmarks of ATI’s Radeon X1950 series graphics cards that showed Radeon X1950 series cards in CrossFire beat out NVIDIA’s Quad SLI. ATI has a new set of benchmarks in its most recent presentation showing similar results. According to ATI’s internal testing a pair of Radeon X1950 series cards in CrossFire beat out a pair of NVIDIA GeForce 7950GX2s in Call of Duty 2, Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, FarCry, F.E.A.R., Half Life 2: Episode 1 and Serious Sam 2. NVIDIA’s Quad SLI appears to only take the lead in Prey and perform the same in Quake 4. The tests were run at 2560x1600 with 4xAA and 8xAF.

ATI has also performed internal testing of single card performance of the X1950XTX and shows minor improvements over the Radeon X1900XT. When compared to NVIDIA’s GeForce 7950GX2 the Radeon X1950XTX beats it out in all six game benchmarks. As this is ATI’s own internal testing, take it as a point of reference until reviews come out.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Funny ATi benchmarking
By MartinT on 8/22/2006 6:53:09 AM , Rating: 3
The single card benches are skewed as expected, using "MaxAA" on the cards, forcing nVidia's products to use a 2xSuperSampling component not available from ATi. No wonder the GeForces see no land in that chart. (which is also starting at "80%" on the y-axis)

Going by these charts, I'm confident to claim that the X1950XTX loses to a GX2 when both use MSAA only, as well as a pair of X1950s in Crossfire losing a lot of benches to comparable SLi combos up to a >full HD res. (1920x1200, 24" LCD's standard)




RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By CHEATON9800XT on 8/22/2006 7:13:31 AM , Rating: 1
CHEATY-I CHEATON still alive


RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By raven3x7 on 8/22/2006 9:02:59 AM , Rating: 2
At least nVIDIA knows how to cheat. This so dawm obvious.
:O X1900XT at $280? Dawm and i just bought a X1800XL at E200


RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By Sharky974 on 8/23/2006 2:25:12 AM , Rating: 2
More like, at least Nvidia knows they can cheat and no websites will call them on it.

Get it right Cletus.

Nvidia used that same "start at 80%" benchmarks a while ago I remember.


RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By Mister X on 8/22/2006 10:04:15 AM , Rating: 2
a 1900 XTX double as fast as a 7900 gtx, their 9800 pro probably beat a 7900 gtx to hehe


RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By imaheadcase on 8/22/2006 10:52:43 AM , Rating: 2
ATI reasoning is "double the memory speed double the performance cletus!". :D


RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By Sharky974 on 8/23/2006 4:45:14 AM , Rating: 2
Too bad it's not double the memory speed, it's 30% more.


RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By Armorize on 8/26/2006 3:52:07 PM , Rating: 1
and too bad nvidiots havent even thought of using samsungs new gddr4 memory which has been out for quite some time now, you guys get to wait til your precious g80


RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By Slaimus on 8/22/2006 2:11:57 PM , Rating: 2
MaxAA for X1900 nonCF is 6X, MaxAA for 7900 nonSLI is 8X. That 's what they are hiding.


RE: Funny ATi benchmarking
By Sharky974 on 8/23/06, Rating: 0
Should the title be "AMD Readies..." instead
By hstewarth on 8/22/2006 1:27:45 PM , Rating: 2
I would think the title should be "AMD Readies..." instead or as the AMD/ATI thing gone in effect yet.




By AthlonAlien on 8/22/2006 3:25:06 PM , Rating: 2
The article states the X1900XTX has a memory speed of 1.450GHz... that is incorrect. The XTX has a memory speed of 1.550GHz, the XT is the one with the speeds of 1.450.

-LaTeR


RE: Should the title be "AMD Readies..." instead
By shabodah on 8/22/2006 4:38:17 PM , Rating: 2
Well if you want to be technical about it, you're way off. It's DDR3 and DDR4. What's the the first "D" stand for again?!?!? LOL!


By OvErHeAtInG on 8/26/2006 9:25:03 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not sure what you're talking about, but the man was correct. The X1900XTX's RAM is 775 MHz or DDR 1.55. The X1900XT's RAM is 725 MHz or DDR 1.45.


RE: Should the title be "AMD Readies..." instead
By gramboh on 8/22/2006 4:24:25 PM , Rating: 3
Unless AMD chooses to amalgamate ATI into the same company, ATI remains a separate operating company (albeit wholly owned by AMD). Remember the deal has not been finalized yet either.


By hstewarth on 8/22/2006 5:41:27 PM , Rating: 1
That is big question when is deal finalized.. any way - any ATI product can basically be treated like it comes from AMD now anyway.


"nine times faster"
By CHEATON9800XT on 8/22/2006 12:04:43 PM , Rating: 2
before, CHEATY-I said
"X1800XT is nine times faster than 7800GTX in FEAR"

but 2times slower with no soft-shadow CHEAT and
no calculation lightsource CHEAT.

same thing.
tell a pack of lies




RE: "nine times faster"
By Myrandex on 8/22/2006 12:57:02 PM , Rating: 2
And what's the point of talking like a renob?


RE: "nine times faster"
By Sharky974 on 8/23/2006 2:28:34 AM , Rating: 1
"Cheaty-I"

Nvidia cheated in RdMark worse than anybody in industry history.

In fact these benchmarks aren't even cheating, they're just misleading. Cheating would be more like Nvidia shimmering driver optimizations no websites call them on so they get benchmarked at lower image qaulity than ATI cards time after time.

That would be more like cheating, Cletus.

But dont look for any websites to do more then mention it in passing, Cletus. They're in Nvidia's back pocket these days.


RE: "nine times faster"
By CHEATON9800XT on 8/25/2006 10:14:27 AM , Rating: 2
CHEATY-I is CHEATER.
CHEATON is poor performance board for RED fanboy.
yes, everybody know it.

NVIDIA is not.


RE: "nine times faster"
By CHEATON9800XT on 8/25/2006 10:25:32 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/ati_radeon_x19...

CHEATON very poor performance.
CHEAT drivers,
CHEAT benchmarks chart,
CHEAT press release,
CHEAT fanboys

poorman's poorCHEATboard.


in ATi's world...
By arturnowp on 8/22/2006 9:31:20 AM , Rating: 2
and now it looks like not even X1950 but also X1900XTX is faster then GeForce 7950GX when they ain't. All reviews that I've read claims that GeForce is King of the hill or so. If Radeon X1900XTX was faster why would ATi release another card? To drop prices? LOL :D