backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 108 comment(s) - last by joset00.. on Dec 17 at 1:53 PM

To make 45nm process manufacturing easier: just add water

Intel has said on multiple occasions that its 45nm process is on track for production 2007. In fact, Intel began sampling its Penryn 45nm chips just several weeks ago. At the IEDM, IBM and AMD described three technologies that hope to compete with Intel’s 45nm development: the use of immersion lithography, which AMD says will “deliver enhanced microprocessor design definition and manufacturing consistency,” ultra-low-K interconnect dielectrics to enhance performance-per-watt ratio and multiple enhanced transistor strain techniques.

Current process technologies use conventional lithography, which has significant limitations in defining microprocessor designs beyond the 65nm process technology generation. Immersion lithography uses a projection lens filled with purified water as part of the step-and-repeat lithography -- think of the same principles applied to immersion microscopy.

Immersion lithography provides increased flow of light, depth of focus and improved image fidelity that can improve chip-level performance and manufacturing efficiency. For example, the performance of an SRAM cell shows improvements of approximately 15 percent due to this enhanced process capability, without resorting to more costly double-exposure techniques.

In addition, AMD and IBM say that the use of porous, ultra-low-K dielectrics reduces interconnect capacitance, wiring delay, as well as lowering power dissipation. This advance is enabled through the development of an ultra-low-K process integration that reduces the dielectric constant of the interconnect dielectric while maintaining the mechanical strength. The addition of ultra-low-K interconnect provides a 15 percent reduction in wiring-related delay as compared to conventional low-K dielectrics.

In spite of the increased packing density of the 45nm generation transistors, IBM and AMD demonstrated multiple enhanced transistor strain techniques that give an 80 per cent increase in p-channel transistor drive current and a 24 per cent increase in n-channel transistor drive current compared to unstrained transistors. The companies claim that their achievement results in the highest CMOS performance reported to date in a 45nm process technology.

In November 2005, AMD and IBM announced an extension of their joint development efforts until 2011 covering 32nm and 22nm process technology generations. AMD and IBM expect the first 45nm products using immersion lithography and ultra-low-K interconnect dielectrics to be available in mid-2008.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

th wonders of AMD
By sbanjac on 12/12/2006 11:19:24 PM , Rating: 3
It is a wonder how AMD manages to follow INTEL even though it has been since ever a year behind when it comes to fabrication processes. Imagine what would happen if AMD had the resources INTEL has.




RE: th wonders of AMD
By Ender17 on 12/12/2006 11:50:59 PM , Rating: 2
Intel isn't an ACRONYM


RE: th wonders of AMD
By asliarun on 12/14/2006 1:46:51 AM , Rating: 2
"Intel isn't an ACRONYM"

Yes, it is. Intel stands for "Integrated Electronics".
Having said that, i do understand what you were trying to point out to the parent poster :-)


RE: th wonders of AMD
By bighairycamel on 12/14/2006 7:15:23 AM , Rating: 2
Then it should be called IntEl gosh darn it.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By AnnihilatorX on 12/17/2006 12:58:03 PM , Rating: 2
ACRONYM isn't an acronym either
:P

The reason he used caps is exactly the same reason as you used caps in ACRONYM, to emphasize


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Viditor on 12/13/2006 12:31:25 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
It is a wonder how AMD manages to follow INTEL even though it has been since ever a year behind when it comes to fabrication processes


1. AMD's 45nm is only 6 months behind Intel
2. The AMD/IBM 45nm process looks to be significantly better than Intel's, but in any case it is VERY different.

I don't think you can actually compare the 2 companies...for instance, if AMD had Intel's resources, they might never have been this driven.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By masher2 (blog) on 12/13/2006 12:46:37 AM , Rating: 2
> "AMD's 45nm is only 6 months behind Intel..."

Bet you a cookie otherwise....that, despite what AMD says now, their first 45nm products will be 9-12 months behind Intel's.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Viditor on 12/13/2006 12:51:09 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Bet you a cookie otherwise

That's a bet! (I prefer Tollhouse...)

http://news.com.com/2061-10791_3-6142714.html

"One of the big questions in the chip industry today is whether Advanced Micro Devices can make the hop to 45-nanometer manufacturing in 18 months, as the company has promised. One prominent analyst says that, so far, the chances look good...
So why the optimism? AMD (and its development partner IBM) have reduced the defect density, the measure of defects per square centimeter) on its test 45-nanometer chips. "The big issue is defects, which IBM and AMD seem to have a leg up on,"


RE: th wonders of AMD
By masher2 (blog) on 12/13/2006 1:01:12 AM , Rating: 2
Well, that article openly wonders if AMD can meet 45nm in another 18 months. Intel is supposed to meet Q307, which, even if AMD makes this goal, 6-9 months behind.

And, as that article points out, it took AMD 26 months to move from the 90 to the 65 node (27, if you consider the fact that Brisbane's probably won't be available for another month yet). For half of that 26 month period, AMD was still proclaiming it was "on track", though they clearly weren't.

Finally, I have to point out the 45nm node transition is considerably more complex than was the 65. Intel demoed 45nm chips a year ago, and they're still 9-12 months out from shipping CPUs. AMD is still having trouble showing us 65nm chips, much less 45s...I find it very hard to believe they'll be shipping them in bulk in a mere 18 months.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Khato on 12/13/2006 1:17:10 AM , Rating: 2
Ayup, Intel will be manufacturing the 45nm CPU's come Q3'07, and shipping for revenue in Q4 I believe it is. After all, have to let the conroe refresh have some time in which to have it's fun, now don't we?

I'm ever skeptical about AMD's manufacturing, though of late they seem to have gotten better. (The initial 130nm T-bred A was late and hot, though as always, hard to say how much a process and how much a design issue.)

As to the 45nm SRAM chips, Intel's was January '06, while AMD's was April '06. The more interesting point about AMD's being that the few things I've found about it seem to imply that immersion lithography wasn't used in it. Heh, and that would be the most possible stumbling block in their 45nm process I'd think.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Viditor on 12/13/2006 1:28:27 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The more interesting point about AMD's being that the few things I've found about it seem to imply that immersion lithography wasn't used in it

A good point, though I haven't heard one way or the other. Remember that (unlike Intel) they have kept their processing method very much under wraps...
I have been hearing that AMD was going immersion for the last 6 months now, but i haven't seen anything concrete about it.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Khato on 12/13/2006 1:56:20 AM , Rating: 2
Mmmmm, I don't quite remember what info on P1266 has and hasn't been released yet, going from the info on Intel's process site it isn't much. In fact, there's no mention of the tricks being implemented, just some of their results, and I'd hate to ruin a surprise.

Whereas AMD's press release today states the use of ultra-low k interconnect dielectrics and immersion lithography in their 45nm process. While the ultra-low k interconnect dielectric shouldn't pose much of a problem, I do wonder at how immersion lithography will go. After all, I don't believe that there has been any mass production with immersion lithography thus far, and I'd imagine it to require a fair bit more retooling than the norm.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Viditor on 12/13/2006 2:08:59 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Mmmmm, I don't quite remember what info on P1266 has and hasn't been released yet, going from the info on Intel's process site it isn't much. In fact, there's no mention of the tricks being implemented, just some of their results, and I'd hate to ruin a surprise

All that I've read so far is that they will use a new high-k metal gate that they released a white paper on a little over a year ago...
http://www.intel.com/technology/silicon/si11031.ht...


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Khato on 12/13/2006 12:06:13 PM , Rating: 2
Ahhhh, so they have released that tidbit already? You had me wondering by the comment about AMD/IBM 45nm process looking better than Intel's.

Hehe, high-k gate dielectric and metal gate electrode >> decreasing wire capacitance by a small amount and possibly etching neater lines.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Viditor on 12/13/2006 11:59:26 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
high-k gate dielectric and metal gate electrode >> decreasing wire capacitance by a small amount and possibly etching neater lines


If that were the extent of the improvements, I would agree with you...but look again at the MASSIVE increase in PMOS and NMOS.
The new DSL process increases efficiency by as much as 80% I believe.
Don't get me wrong, Intel's high-k/metal is absolutely brilliant...and it may indeed prove to be better. At this point my GUESS is that it won't be, but that is more of a WAG than anything else.
The defect decrease from immersion will certainly help AMD's yields and should keep costs down significantly.
Either way, we are going to be seeing some awesome chips coming out over the next 2 years, and at very reasonable pricing too!


RE: th wonders of AMD
By masher2 (blog) on 12/14/06, Rating: 0
RE: th wonders of AMD
By Viditor on 12/14/2006 7:52:58 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Its not going to reduce defect rates...in fact, the resultant increase in defect rates is one of the primary factors speaking against its use

Which is why the article on reduced defects for the IBM/AMD process is so exciting!
I seem to recall that AMD wasn't expected to be successful with SOI either...in fact Intel commented that it wasn't really possible economically until at least 45nm or below.


RE: th wonders of AMD
By Khato on 12/14/2006 1:03:48 AM , Rating: 2
Hehe, I guess that the 80% pmos/24% nmos channel drive current increase compared to unstrained transistors might be a massive increase for AMD/IBM. I'm more tempted to call it playing catch up to Intel whose strained silicon tech will be on its third process node at 45nm.

Adding greater experience in strained silicon together with the high-k gate dielectric/metal gate should result in the Intel 45nm process having even greater channel drive current than the AMD/IBM. Not to mention the fact that high-k gate dielectrics say bye bye to gate leakage.

Mmm, and I wonder how the dielectric constant of the AMD/IBM 'ultra-low-k' interconnect dielectric compares to the Intel? It's hard to say since they don't often state the actual numbers, just the results of it in comparison to another previous unknown quantity, lol.

Oh, and boo hiss to reasonable pricing! Let's get those budget machines back up over $1000 with 30% of that going to the CPU manufacturers =D