backtop


Print 24 comment(s) - last by Pryde.. on Mar 6 at 8:19 PM

With more money and an updated expansion plan, AMD hopes to catch up to Intel

On February 18th, Advanced Micro Devices held a special meeting of its shareholders to approve several financial transactions that would allow AMD to spin off its fabs into a joint venture with the Advanced Technology Investment Company (ATIC), wholly owned by the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.

AMD had been using "The Foundry Company" as a working title, and there was speculation that it would be adopted formally. Rumors of other names surfaced, such as AMD Foundry and Advanced Technology Foundries.

Instead, AMD has announced that the company will be known as "GLOBALFOUNDRIES". Official appearances of the name have shown it to be a single capitalized word. NVIDIA, the rival of AMD's graphics division ATI, also encourages the capitalization of its name in its marketing and press materials.

AMD received $700 million from ATIC as payment for its stake in GLOBALFOUNDRIES, which will assume approximately $1.1 billion of AMD's debt. This will enable AMD to regain profitability more quickly, as it will have to pay less interest on its crushing debt load. Its credit rating may also be upgraded, allowing access to capital that has been limited by the global credit crisis.

Paul Otellini, Intel's President and CEO, has publicly questioned AMD's future cost structure, with a prognosis that the "cost plus" contract between AMD and GLOBALFOUNDRIES will inevitably lead to a widening price/performance delta between the two CPU giants.

He stated: "The Mubadala guys will want a return on their investment", referring to Mubadala Development, a sovereign wealth fund also wholly owned by the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.

Mubadala currently owns 16.05% of AMD through its subsidiary West Coast Hitech (WCH), a Cayman Island based holding company. Mubadala paid AMD approximately $125 million for 58 million newly issued AMD shares and warrants for 35 million additional shares, with both transactions approved at the February shareholder meeting. If the warrants are fully exercised, Mubadala will own 142 million shares, accounting for 19.9% of AMD on a fully diluted basis, including outstanding stock options and restricted stock units.

Meanwhile, ATIC and AMD will each control 50% of GLOBALFOUNDRIES, but ATIC may see its ownership increase over time based on future capital infusions of up to $6 billion.

AMD's facilities in Dresden, Germany will be combined together into a new entity known as Fab 1. The fabrication plant formerly known as Fab 36 will be called Module 1, and will continue production of 45nm Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) CPUs. Fab 38 will be known as Module 2, and will continue transitioning to 32nm bulk silicon with a targeted introduction in 2010.
 
ATI may use GLOBALFOUNDRIES 32nm bulk silicon process for its future DirectX 11 parts, but has no plans to discontinue production at its key technology partner TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company). Instead, the ATI division will continue its policy of having dual-sourcing for suppliers where possible, as it still has agreements with UMC (United Microelectronics Corporation), another major foundry.

Fab 2 will be a new greenfield development built in the Luther Forest Technology Campus, located in Saratoga County, New York. The long delayed site was initially supposed to begin production on a 32nm SOI process, but will instead ramp up 22nm volume production in 2012.

The cost of construction and fabrication equipment at Fab 2 is expected to cost at least $4.2 billion, and was a key driver for the spin-off. Fab 2 will allow AMD to compete with Intel on future technologies, and was designed on the same principles as the Dresden site. It will be capable of expansion through additional production modules.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES expects 1400 new jobs will be created through direct employment at Fab 2, with more than 5000 jobs created indirectly throughout the region.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

i just hope it works
By inperfectdarkness on 3/5/2009 9:18:13 AM , Rating: 5
a non-competitive AMD means intel can be greedy with pricing; just like a non-competitive ATI means that NVIDIA can keep shelling out 2-year products with any number of "invented" product names--and not pay the piper for doing so.

i suspect that with proper management, AMD will be able to achieve performance parity with intel by the time these new fabs are complete. i say "performance" with respect to their manufacturing costs and the power consumption of their CPU's...not necessarily their processing power.




RE: i just hope it works
By ninjaquick on 3/5/2009 4:28:02 PM , Rating: 1
bcause their <1 year old tech is too big and clunky to streamline and make energy efficient.. wuuuut WUT??! Count it!


RE: i just hope it works
By Pryde on 3/5/2009 10:48:20 PM , Rating: 2
While Intel top of the line processors run $1000+ they have always had a great mid/low range product at a reasonable price ( and decent OC ) nor have they stopped releasing new processors rapidly. Intel had trouble with P4 just like AMD had troubles with Ph1.

AMD is the company of price gouging with the X2 and not releasing a new processor design. ( Ph1 a flop and took to long to reach market, Ph2 while good atm we have to wait and see how it will compete with i5. )


RE: i just hope it works
By iamezza on 3/6/2009 12:44:41 PM , Rating: 2
So do you think if AMD went bust that intel would still have "a great mid/low range product at a reasonable price"?


RE: i just hope it works
By Pryde on 3/6/2009 8:19:57 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think there would be an increase of price but instead we wouldn't see price cuts as often. We are moving away from pure performance and seeing more and more far cheaper but slower CPUs. 1.6Ghz Desktop Atom, Pair it with a 9400 IGP and you can pretty much do anything that the AVERAGE user ever needs. The Mid - High end is always going to come at a increased cost but it is the Low - Mid range that makes the profits ( in desktop area ) and increased cost will slow down people from upgrading which would hurt profits.

Intel has kept to a very similar pricing structure since the P3 days, OEMs, Servers etc would all have something to say about a drastic increase in price.


GLOBALFOUNDRIES build Intel chips?
By AntiM on 3/5/2009 10:01:17 AM , Rating: 2
Now that GLOBALFOUNDRIES is technically not under the control of AMD, it's possible (however remotely) that they could manufacture chips for Intel and NVIDIA. Intel has already partnered with TSMC to build their Atom processor.
If GLOBALFOUNDRIES were to stick to only manufacturing AMD chips, then there's no good reason for the spin-off.




RE: GLOBALFOUNDRIES build Intel chips?
By Judguh on 3/5/2009 10:41:16 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
If GLOBALFOUNDRIES were to stick to only manufacturing AMD chips, then there's no good reason for the spin-off.

Except to take a massive amount of AMD's debt off its shoulders...


By phazers on 3/5/2009 12:35:43 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Except to take a massive amount of AMD's debt off its shoulders...


IIRC, AMD will still have $4B debt on the ATI purchase left on its shoulders, since the spinoff only got rid of ~20% or $1.1B of the debt. So don't worry - there's plenty of debt remaining to be spun off :).


By Penti on 3/5/2009 9:17:14 PM , Rating: 2
Yes it's a great deal for AMD, and now both their manufacturing wing GLOBALFOUNDRIES and AMD will get a capital injection and investment in both wings will be easier and more attractive. It enables them working on both new designs and new fab technology.


I hope...
By FireSnake on 3/5/2009 9:25:06 AM , Rating: 3
... that they proceed as planned. Not only because they would have more profit with smaller technology, but for us who will be paying less.

The more competitive they are the better for us.

Even Intel fanboys must agree with this one - because they are paying less.




RE: I hope...
By Pryde on 3/5/2009 10:52:33 PM , Rating: 2
I doubt it, with the debt that AMD is in they will be trying to make as much as possible.


GLOBALFOUNDRIES
By InternetGeek on 3/5/2009 7:07:42 PM , Rating: 3
The name is sounds good when taken as two separate title-cased words: Global Foundries. Add the ", inc." if you want.

Otherwise it sounds so made-up, in the Nigerian-rich-guy sense. Just imagine getting an offer from them to make your chips:

quote:
Good Morning Sir/Madam

I'm MR. BOB SMITH from GLOBALFOUNDRIES. We want to build your chips for the amount of 20MILLIONDOLLARS. Please contact us if you're interested in this offer so we can arrange BANKTRANSFER.





RE: GLOBALFOUNDRIES
By AnnihilatorX on 3/6/2009 10:07:00 AM , Rating: 2
Is it just me but I think having a long string of capital letters is just a pain to the eyes.


Good news about saratoga plant
By rudolphna on 3/5/2009 11:38:05 AM , Rating: 4
This is good news for my area. I live in Ballston Spa, New york, located in Saratoga county. the actual plant will be built in Malta, which is about a 10 minute drive from my house. Everyone here is incredibly excited about the jobs and taxes the new fab will bring. AMD has already had a presentation at the BSCSD (Ballston spa central school district) to disscuss fundraisers, and ways AMD will be able to help the area's schools. As I said, everyone here, while most may not know much about AMD besides that it is a "chipmaker" they know that it will bring jobs and capital to the region. Thanks, AMD.




ugh
By Howard on 3/5/2009 7:59:23 PM , Rating: 2
I would love to talk about the newfound company but I can't seem to stop yelling.




Maybe I am to patriotic
By PAPutzback on 3/5/09, Rating: -1
RE: Maybe I am to patriotic
By FireSnake on 3/5/2009 9:27:10 AM , Rating: 4
And if it wasn't anything there, so what?

And, to calm you down ... a new factory is about to be built in the US.


RE: Maybe I am to patriotic
By PAPutzback on 3/5/2009 9:42:23 AM , Rating: 2
As long as some of the wealth is spread here, I can't complain. There used to be the fear of Japan buying up all the real Estate in California now it seems like all the tech companies are giving up a lot of their ownership to companies in the UAE.


RE: Maybe I am to patriotic
By Motoman on 3/5/2009 11:19:10 AM , Rating: 5
...it's not like there's a whole lot of US-based investment firms investing much anymore...

Reminds me of the time I pulled into a parking lot in my Dodge truck, and parked near a Honda something or other, the owner of which was having an, um, discussion with another gentleman. I have no idea what started it, but the "other" guy sees me pull in and as I get out of the truck, says something to the effect of "see, now there's a guy who knows what I'm talking about - he's an AMERICAN driving an AMERICAN truck."

The Honda owner, perplexed to begin with, looks at me in a rather befuddled way. I glance at his Honda and say "Well, my truck was built in Mexico City, and his Honda was built in Ohio - so you tell me."

Don't worry about who is invested in what and where something gets made. The economy is the economy.


RE: Maybe I am to patriotic
By FITCamaro on 3/5/2009 3:42:07 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah well Obama's proposed cap and trade policy will surely cause a loss of jobs here in the states in the manufacturing industry.


RE: Maybe I am to patriotic
By BionicBigfoot on 3/5/2009 1:55:48 PM , Rating: 2
Um AMD plans to open a multibillion dollar chip plant and create 2,000 new jobs in upstate rural NY. AMD announced today that it is a done deal and clearing land for the plant will begin in the next month. Not only will 2,000 premanent jobs inside the US be created but local construction businesses will be reaping the benefits as well.

I live in the Saratoga area and it's all over the news here.

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/188943-28-choose...

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-03/05/conte...


RE: Maybe I am to patriotic
By xeroshadow on 3/6/2009 3:57:12 AM , Rating: 2
Nice to see some good news for once. Makes me glad I purchased an AMD processor(not to mention I'm really happy with the performance of the Phenom II).


RE: Maybe I am to patriotic
By Noliving on 3/5/2009 6:10:36 PM , Rating: 2
Is that really a bad thing?


Irrelevant but..
By Sir Picto on 3/5/09, Rating: -1
"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki