backtop


Print 6 comment(s) - last by Trisped.. on Jun 27 at 9:51 AM


  (Source: NBC Universal)
Printing appears to be an inadvertent side effect, not an intended end goal

Trojan.Milicenso, first discovered in 2010, has grown into a wondrous piece of malware with a set of defense mechanisms that reminds one of state-created malware like Stuxnet.  However, this piece of malware is clearly the work of freeland black hats, which look to use the clever package to deliver popular malware payloads, like Adware.Eorezo, an adware targeting French-speaking users.

The malware's methodology of hiding itself starts with its update procedure.  The program only sends encrypted requests to attack servers, obfuscating the stolen details it has logged.  Returned files are also encrypted to preserve secrecy.

The malware DLL also uses heavy-duty 16-byte RC4 encryption to prevent its code from being reverse engineered.  It also contains clever -- and rather unique -- code to detect whether it's on a virtual machine, known public malware sandbox, or black-boxing site such as ThreatExpert.

Printbomb
The trojan supresses itself when on blackboxes/VMs. [Image Source: Symantec]

These precautions might have helped the Trojan escape detection or analysis by security professionals, were it not for an inadvertent error, much like Stuxnet's, which caused the malware to inadvertently list its presence.

In Stuxnet's case the red flag was failed code to confine the virus geographically to Iranian IPs.  In the Trojan.Milicenso's case it's an executable .spl (spool) file named [DRIVE_LETTER]\system32\Spool\PRINTERS\[RANDOM].spl, which leads the infected machine to inadvertently print pages of garbage -- a paper salesman's dream.

Despite the profit potential for the paper industry (at the expense of the trees, of course), it does not appear that outcome was intentional.  The malware authors went to great lengths to hide their program, but the mystery auto-printing allowed Symantec Corp. (SYMC) researchers to identify and quantify this latest variant.

Symantec and other antivirus providers have updated their software to detect and remove some variants of this Trojan.  However, new version with garbage padding to escape detection have been popping up, so we may be hearing more about this merry printing virus for a while now.

Sources: Symantec, SANS



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Just profit
By wifiwolf on 6/25/2012 5:59:33 PM , Rating: 2
Gone is the time when virus crafting was for fame. Now just profit.




RE: Just profit
By mindless1 on 6/25/2012 7:40:39 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah, I'm sure the author(s) own all the paper companies. Or not.


RE: Just profit
By Ammohunt on 6/26/2012 2:39:11 PM , Rating: 2
Famous for going to jail? as OJ how that worked out for him.


I'm not worried
By jemix on 6/25/2012 10:53:49 PM , Rating: 2
The article mentions that this trojan lays dormant when it determines that it is running on a virtual machine in order to avoid detection.

That's fine. But how does it cope with the fact that every time I power down the vm, it reverts to the last snap shot.

Sure, I may never know that the vm was infected, but who cares?




RE: I'm not worried
By Solandri on 6/26/2012 3:16:12 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The article mentions that this trojan lays dormant when it determines that it is running on a virtual machine in order to avoid detection.

Another possible work-around (one that I'm moving more towards, though not for anti-virus reasons) is to just run all your productivity apps inside virtual machines. Your main OS is just a hypervisor which manages the VMs. All your real work is done within the VMs.


Heavy-Duty?
By Trisped on 6/27/2012 9:51:58 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The malware DLL also uses heavy-duty 16-byte RC4 encryption
A 128 bit RC4 cipher with all the documentation about how bad its key generator is and known exploits is heavy-duty? I guess I need to kick up my security because I have been using normal-duty encryption for things I would not even consider RC4 for.




"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki