backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 16 comment(s) - last by herrdoktor330.. on Mar 16 at 11:17 AM


This notice on the NTIA's sweb site gives details on the DTV converter coupons.
The U.S. government has unveiled a new plan to ease the transition when the nation's TV broadcasters officially flip the switch from analog to digital on February 19, 2009

According to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) plan introduced this week, all U.S. consumers will be eligible for up to an $80 subsidy to pay for analog-to-digital TV converters. Delivered in the form of coupons redeemable at electronics stores, the subsidy is designed to help consumers cope with the change and prevent their old analog TVs from "going dark."

The switchover will primarily affect the minority of U.S. TV viewers that rely on TV antennas and over-the-air (OTA) signals for their broadcast programming. According to the Federal Communications Commission, up to 90 percent of U.S. households currently get their TV signal via a satellite or cable provider. People who receive programming in this way are not likely to notice when broadcasters power down their analog transmitters for good in 2009.

Starting Jan. 1, 2008, all U.S. households will be eligible to request up to two $40 coupons, to be used toward the purchase of up to two digital-to-analog converter boxes. The coupons will be issued until the $990 million initial allocation for the program is exhausted. Once those funds are gone, the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 then authorizes Congress to increase funding by another $510 million. The second allocation will be available to OTA-only households, however. In other words, consumers will have to certify that they do not subscribe to cable, satellite or other pay television services in order to qualify for the second round of coupons. 

The coupons themselves will resemble retail "gift cards," and will expire three months after they arrive by U.S. mail. They cannot legally be used to purchase anything except a digital-to-analog converter.

One of the government's major goals in establishing the DTV transition plan is to clear the way for opening up vast amounts of broadcast spectrum for advanced wireless communications, including use by military public safety agencies.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

okay
By yacoub on 3/15/2007 7:37:20 AM , Rating: 2
So my little 15" TV from 1994 that has a coax cable connection which is how I get '24' (the only thing I watch on TV)... I assume I'll need a Digital-to-Analog converter box for it come 2009 if it's still working?

Also I imagine Comcast will not lower its "digital package" rates at all so everyone will be paying $60 for what-will-then-be-mandatory digital cable instead of how I am currently paying ~$13 for just a few basic stations... *sigh*




RE: okay
By BMFPitt on 3/15/2007 8:48:16 AM , Rating: 3
This only applies to antennas. All cable is unaffected. Your $13 package will be fine.


RE: okay
By RamarC on 3/15/2007 12:13:41 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
This only applies to antennas. All cable is unaffected. Your $13 package will be fine.

it will be unaffected for the near future. but cable will be going all digital within 18 months of the analog phase-out. why -- because of bandwidth. they'll finally have room for all the hd channels and many more "in-demand"/interactive channels.


RE: okay
By Soviet Robot on 3/15/2007 3:17:09 PM , Rating: 2
Cable is a digital medium. They're not changing much by making your analog TV obsolete. In fact, should comcast or any other cable company change all of their signals to digital, they would surely provide their customers with a converter box.


RE: okay
By herrdoktor330 on 3/16/2007 11:17:09 AM , Rating: 2
Hello. I just wanted to throw in my input from a cable industry worker servicing Time Warner, Comcast, and some of the other smaller "mom and pop" companies.

Sadly, all analog packages are going the way of the dodo. As of right now, it's the initiative of most cable companies to push digital boxes in people's homes under the guise of "enhanced cable", displaying the digital features with none of the extra content. Cable Companies are also rolling out "Simulcasting" or "Digital Multiplexing" which layers digital rebroadcasts over your regular analog channels. This leads to better picture quality, but at the expense of box rental fees.

Another interesting aside to this that you all may or may not know; commercials you see on digital cable are tailored to your viewing preferences. Try this test: take a tv in your home with analog cable and watch it side-by-side with your DCT enabled television. Wait for the commercial break. On your analog tv, you'll see an ad most likely for the cable company pushing digital service. On the other, you'll see an ad for something that you'd be more interested in. Example: lets say your wife watches primarily "woman focused" networks like Oh!, Lifetime, and so on on your digital box. Most of your advertising will be tailored to woman needs, like hygene products, perfumes and the like. If you watch more sports programming or wrestling, you'll see more ads for weight gainers, PPV events, or sports packages for sale. Cable Companies do regular routine data collection from your cable boxes tracking your viewing preferences to better market and target their advertising on you, the viewer.

Don't worry, my fellow tech friends. It's not all doom, gloom, and paranoia. The upshot of this analog reclaimation is that for about $20, your cable company can offer you more programming for your money. In reference to our friend who's paying $13 for basic tier, for a few dollars more in box rental he'll get more channels. Also, there's nothing binding you to digital boxes either. Much to my suprise, our friends at the FCC are really strong-arming the cable industry to make CableCard technology more compatable and accessable to their services, so you don't have to pay as much in box rental usually with rental prices somewhere around $1 a card.

The point I'm getting at with this long winded post is that the consumer, along with the cable and broadcast industry, has lot to gain from the push from analog broadcasts to all digital. But I believe that all of you who enjoyed reading this would enjoy a little "insider's insight" on the whole affair.


RE: okay
By Mitch101 on 3/15/2007 8:50:00 AM , Rating: 2
That's my gripe with all the companies being mandated to move to digital then my cable company shouldnt be able to charge me extra for a mandated product by the govt.

I have Direct TV but these Misc charges are rediculous.


RE: okay
By BigLan on 3/15/2007 8:57:04 AM , Rating: 2
As posted above, cable will continue to offer an analog package. It's only the analog 'over the air' broadcasts that are being turned off, so will only effect those people using rabit ears.


Typo
By rmaharaj on 3/15/2007 3:14:43 AM , Rating: 2
Don't mean to be a hardass, but...
quote:
One of the government's major in establishing...

There's a word missing there, maybe 'goals'?

Cheers!




RE: Typo
By fic2 on 3/15/2007 11:02:25 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
subsidy to pay for analog-to-digital


shouldn't that be digital-to-analog?

Anyway - yet another government program to give away our tax dollars. This for entertainment no less.

Where is my subsidy for attending a movie or something?


RE: Typo
By dever on 3/15/2007 1:26:03 PM , Rating: 1
Yes, this is one of the most disturbing uses of my tax dollars that I've seen in a long time. Who's running this operation, Fidel, from his hospital bed? I don't have cable, nor do I watch OTA programming. Yet, my paycheck is docked to provide someone else thier soap opera fix. I know this is just one of many idiotic handouts, but this one's just infuriating!


RE: Typo
By joelcfc25 on 3/15/2007 6:38:46 PM , Rating: 2
The program is costing $1.5 billion. The fiscal year 2008 budget proposed by the President is $2.9 trillion. My crude math tells me that's 0.05% of the total federal budget. Maybe you can find someone who will Paypal you back the smidgeon that was your share. For perspective, this program's entire budget is only about 5 times more than the proposed funding for Alaska's infamous "bridge to nowhere" that would connect a town of 8,000 to an island of 50 residents.

And the converter box program is now slated to benefit everyone--the originally proposed NTIA rule would have restricted eligibility to the estimated 19 to 21 million OTA-only households. If you had cable or satellite anywhere in your house you wouldn't have been eligible...even if you had only one TV with cable and 3 with rabbit ears. Now in the first phase you can snag a voucher to get that old TV in the basement or on your three-season porch into the modern age without dropping a few hundred on a new TV with an ATSC tuner.

I like decrying federal government wastefulness as much as the next guy, but this doesn't seem like a very worthy tilt at that windmill, especially considering the magnitude of this technological shift. I think the budget for this program--and the public education and advertising part of it--is laughably small. 20 million OTA-only households and the untold millions more that have cable/satellite but also some OTA televisions is a LOT of potentially furious retirees and old grannies who have no clue this is coming in 23 months. Lastly, the government is going to be raking in billions from the sale of the freed-up public spectrum, so you could think of that as recouping this cost.


OTA PVR Please?
By Mitch101 on 3/15/2007 8:48:21 AM , Rating: 2
I would like to see a set top OTA PVR with no subscription fees for under $400.00. Or even better one sold without a hard drive for $200.00 so I can choose if I want a 750gig or 1tb hard drive in the unit.

I have HDTV tuners set top boxes and Media Center with dual HD tuners which are nice but I would like to see a set top device already. Come on China I know you can make one and cheap!




RE: OTA PVR Please?
By psychobriggsy on 3/15/2007 9:48:01 AM , Rating: 2
These are quite common in Europe, but we use DVB instead of ATSC so they're useless for you. Basic Freeview digital TV receivers cost from £20, which is about $30. A few quid more gets you the seven day EPG and other stuff. Of course there are more deluxe versions at up to £80 or so, and the ones with built in hard drive and dual digital tuners and the like (between £100 and £200). e.g., http://www.amazon.co.uk/Daewoo-DSD9503T-160gb-Digi...

However our system only does SD digital TV. Our HD digital uses H.264, and will require new boxes (typical!). OTA HD digital in the US uses MPEG2, and will require a bit more CPU grunt to decode than SD which may make the boxes a little bit more costly.

Just to let you know that what you desire will arrive at some point.


RE: OTA PVR Please?
By RamarC on 3/15/2007 12:07:52 PM , Rating: 2
most dvd based dvrs are less than $200. the tv guide features/fees are the issue, not the hardware.


I might grab a couple
By Lazarus Dark on 3/15/2007 7:05:10 AM , Rating: 2
I mean, the money's basically already set aside for me, so I may as well get it, right? Though I'm guessing these things won't likely be very feature-filled, probably not much more than a 75ohm jack and a power cord, maybe a simple remote, maybe not even that. Hmm... I only need one, I wonder if I could get away with getting two coupons to get a better version for 80 bucks, probably not.

...
Wait, wait, wait. Now that I think about it, these won't even have hd output capability. Probably composite at best. All the hd channels will be downrezed to 480i.
Nevermind, this would be a complete waste of space for someone who really doesn't need it to get ota as their only source on an old analog tv. I guess I probably won't get one then, why bother? As for warning all the old people in my family about The Day The Analog Dies, well, even my great grandmother has digital cable on her 25 year old wood cabinet analog tv; so I don't know a single person that will even notice the analog ota has stopped.




RE: I might grab a couple
By joelcfc25 on 3/15/2007 6:49:11 PM , Rating: 2
S-video at best, and the inclusion of such an output will be optional for manufacturers of certified boxes.


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson










botimage
Copyright 2008 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki