backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 28 comment(s) - last by AlphaVirus.. on Mar 25 at 3:32 PM

Justice Department approves XM-Sirius merger.

Sirius and XM announced last year that the companies wanted to merge radio operations into one large satellite radio provider. It has taken over a year to find out if the XM/Sirius baby would be stillborn. However, the Justice Department today gave its seal of approval for the merger.

"After a careful and thorough review of the proposed transaction, the Division concluded that the evidence does not demonstrate that the proposed merger of XM and Sirius is likely to substantially lessen competition, and that the transaction therefore is not likely to harm consumers," said the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division in a statement.

"The Division reached this conclusion because the evidence did not show that the merger would enable the parties to profitably increase prices to satellite radio customers for several reasons, including: a lack of competition between the parties in important segments even without the merger; the competitive alternative services available to consumers; technological change that is expected to make those alternatives increasingly attractive over time; and efficiencies likely to flow from the transaction that could benefit consumers."

When Sirius and XM announced the intention to merge the two companies in February of 2007, the FCC was quick to say that the merger would be unlikely to gain approval, as it would create one large monopoly for satellite radio users. In March of 2007, former Attorney General John Ashcroft and the National Association of Broadcasters voiced their opinions saying they were very against the merger of Sirius and XM.

The proposed merger ran into more trouble in March when a patent infringement suit was filed against both XM and Sirius by Keystone Autonics. Keystone claimed that technology covered in a patent granted to George Hindman of Keystone Autonics was used by both companies.

XM and Sirius issued a statement to DailyTech saying the merger of the two companies would create more choice for consumers not less. A few months after that statement XM and Sirius revealed plans for ala carte services that would allow subscribers to choose programming from both XM and Sirius line-ups.

The FCC opened the topic of the XM/Sirius merger to public comment in June of 2007.

While the merger had more than its share of critics, one group that was vocal in its support for the merger was the Parents Television Council. This lobbying group said the mergers proposed ala carte programming would allow parents to block adult content, like Howard Stern, with greater ease.

Now that the merger has been approved, it’s up to XM and Sirius to prove to consumers that the merger will be a benefit to everyone, not just the satellite radio providers.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Hold off a little bit longer?
By Kefner on 3/24/2008 3:40:24 PM , Rating: 2
I was seriously considering signing up for a satellite radio provider soon, I guess I should hold off to see what the service offers are. I wonder if this info is on their sites yet. Guess I'll go check it out :)




RE: Hold off a little bit longer?
By RjBass on 3/24/2008 4:23:41 PM , Rating: 1
Since the merger still has yet to be approved by the FCC, details on exactly what offers they will have will most likely be non existent at the moment.


RE: Hold off a little bit longer?
By h0kiez on 3/24/2008 4:42:29 PM , Rating: 2
Not completely true. Certain plans/options were mandated as part of the approval. As for holding off, it may be smart, may not. I'm still using my lifetime sub that I paid $499 for a little over 4 years ago, so I'm interested to see what they'll do with that.


RE: Hold off a little bit longer?
By 9nails on 3/24/2008 10:57:55 PM , Rating: 2
I paid for my lifetime subscription about 2 years ago. I do hope that it continues to be all access while staying completely paid for. I'd be fairly upset if they remodel the service with "premium" channels and ask me to pay again. Then again, I hope that I can take advantage of some "grandfather clause" if they should remove the lifetime subscription. I understand that XM never had a lifetime subscription, which has me slightly worried that the model might fall after XM's design if that's still the larger subscription service.


By AlphaVirus on 3/25/2008 3:32:57 PM , Rating: 2
Wow that is a great deal, $500/lifetime. I had never knew about such a deal through sat radio. I might have to look into this because if you have it for, lets just say, 20yrs that is only a little over $1/month.

Did you have that through Sirius or XM? And was that a special at the time or is that an ongoing price? I understand once the merger is complete that things will change but I just want an idea of how it works.


By theapparition on 3/25/2008 7:15:41 AM , Rating: 2
The FCC does not have to approve this, it's a done deal.


Not a monopoly
By AlexWade on 3/24/2008 3:52:56 PM , Rating: 3
Although XM-Sirius will be the only satellite provider out there, they are not a monopoly. If they start to get complacent and raise their prices, I'll dump my subscription and go back to my iPod and CD's. That is why I was all for this merger. There is a legitimate and real threat to the merged company. I'm glad the merger went through. Now I get the things I want on Sirius and the things I want on XM.




RE: Not a monopoly
By mmntech on 3/24/2008 4:12:26 PM , Rating: 1
Same here when it comes to price increases. I was kind of mad when XM raised the price to $14.99 and if it goes any higher, it's not worth it. The other big question is the talent. I know a lot of people are worried O&A might be dumped in favour of Howard, which would be a great tragedy. I was kind of against the merger myself because of this.

Another thing worth considering is the hardware. Now that they're offering a la carte service, will old XM receivers be able to pick up the Sirius content and vice versa? There doesn't seem to be any clear info on that.


RE: Not a monopoly
By FITCamaro on 3/25/2008 8:57:27 AM , Rating: 2
If they start offering it for $4.99 a month or something, I might bite. Until then, I'm happy with the radio.

About the only guy on satellite I'd care to listen to is Bubba the Love Sponge. He used to be a DJ on my favorite station in Orlando until the FCC decided to come down on him because some lawmaker overheard his kid listening to him.

Him, Pat Lynch, and Taco Bob were hilarious in the mornings. Larry the Cable Guy was even there until his career took off more (although I'm less a fan of his now because its getting old).


Say hello to higher prices.
By 91TTZ on 3/24/2008 6:04:36 PM , Rating: 2
Currently, I get all of Sirius's channels for their flat rate. After the merger and the ala carte channel lineup is announced, I seriously doubt that you'll be able to get all the channels that we currently get for the same price.

They'll probably offer a low-tier plan for what I'm paying now, and I'll have to buy back the remaining channels which will bump up the bill considerably.




RE: Say hello to higher prices.
By tacojohn on 3/24/2008 8:15:30 PM , Rating: 2
Ala carte might be great for people who only want Howard Stern and baseball, but I like a lot of the XM channels, and I'm not looking forward to the merger going through. I highly doubt I'll be able to get even all my current XM channels for what I currently pay. I desperately hope they offer Sirius and XM legacy accounts, where I can continue to receive all the XM channels or their equivalents for what I currently pay.


well...
By Moishe on 3/24/2008 3:45:03 PM , Rating: 3
A-la-carte rocks... Good deal all around.




Dang it! No more free service!
By therealnickdanger on 3/24/2008 4:22:36 PM , Rating: 2
I've been a Sirius subscriber for almost 3 years and I love it. However, when it came time to renew my subscription in December, I decided not to. I only enjoy about 4 channels, so it wasn't really worth the price anymore. When I called to cancel and told them why, Sirius offered me free service until the merger was complete - after which point I could use the ala carte option to pick the stations I wanted.

No more free service. :(

LOL




RE: Dang it! No more free service!
By RjBass on 3/24/2008 4:25:21 PM , Rating: 1
Since the merger is not yet complete I would have to assume you are still getting your service for free.


ew
By NYHoustonman on 3/24/2008 4:49:12 PM , Rating: 2
O&A Party Rock

I'm not really liking this merger :|.




By Integral9 on 3/25/2008 10:25:23 AM , Rating: 2
I can't believe this was approved and the DirecTV / Dish Network merger was axed. How asinine is that? Not that I am unhappy about it's approval I think it's a good thing since, imo, satellite based transmission is still a bit too cost prohibitive. If this goes through the satellite TV providers should reopen their merger deal with the FCC siting this as grounds for approval. After all, they are competing with the same services / devices as the radio folks. Personally I think the FCC was just a little too chicken [poop] to allow the two TV companies to merge at the time. And this merger gives them a chance to test the results of allowing such a merger.




meh
By Flunk on 3/24/08, Rating: -1
RE: meh
By WileCoyote on 3/24/08, Rating: 0
RE: meh
By RjBass on 3/24/2008 4:21:58 PM , Rating: 1
Sirius alone has over 2 million subscribers, if not more then 3 million. So I really don't know what your getting at.


RE: meh
By Oregonian2 on 3/24/2008 5:22:23 PM , Rating: 2
Also XM radio provides the music channels on DirecTV which has a good many subscribers as well.


RE: meh
By SkeeterLDR2004 on 3/24/2008 5:03:56 PM , Rating: 4
From the Wall Street Journal's website at 5:01 EST:

Sirius has 8.3 Million Subscribers
XM has 9 Million Subscribers

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/i...

Total of 17.3 Million subscribers, or about 5.8% of the US population.


RE: meh
By nitrous9200 on 3/24/2008 5:20:21 PM , Rating: 2
And growing steadily too, according to this graph ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/60/XM_a... ) No surprise, many new cars come with satellite radios and free trials, and it's great being able to get a lot of good programming wherever you are, and online as well.


RE: meh
By SkeeterLDR2004 on 3/24/2008 7:37:50 PM , Rating: 2
I know that the growth rate of satellite radio is going to continue to accelerate if this merger is completed. I was tempted to jump on to the Sirius bandwagon a few month ago, but I couldn't justify paying $13 a month for 5 stations. If they offer a la carte stations for $1 each, I'll definitely sign up. My point is that my mentality is probably similar to millions of others.


RE: meh
By 9nails on 3/24/2008 10:50:33 PM , Rating: 2
Sirius came with my car and a 90-day demo. I was happy with the the selection of channels and thrilled by the lack of commercials. I listen to the comedy, pop, rock, and hip-hop stations fairly regularly. At the time, it was easy to justify a lifetime subscription since I do expect to keep my car for long term. Today, my subscription is still well worth the cost since I have access to free internet streaming of music as well. So I can listen to Sirius in the car and on my Work/Home PC's. I'd say that the lifetime subscription is worthy of investigation if it's still being offered and you have the money. (tax rebate?)


RE: meh
By Sunrise089 on 3/24/2008 5:31:10 PM , Rating: 2
And not all Americans are drivers, so it's a large proportion of that group. Even more importantly, many people can listen to one sat radio tuner. The real comparison would be between sat radio subscribers and cable/satellite TV accounts. I'd guess that number is something like 125M, so it's probably fair to say that sat radio has something like 10-15% the reach of television.

Hardly a drop in the bucket.


RE: meh
By ebakke on 3/24/2008 6:43:09 PM , Rating: 2
something like 10-15% the reach of cable television.


RE: meh
By Chaser on 3/24/2008 5:24:53 PM , Rating: 2
Satellite radio is not for everyone.


RE: meh
By mpjesse on 3/24/2008 7:47:15 PM , Rating: 2
Hmmm... I guess 17,000,000 people isn't a lot to you. While it may be a small percentage of the US population, it happens to be a growing business. Revenues should be around $2 billion for both companies combined this year.

As for the market not being large enough for 2 providers, I do agree with you. But that may change in a few years. Satellite radio is growing at a breakneck pace. Consider this: in 2004 there were approximately 4 million subscribers on both Sirius and XM. Today there are 17 million. XM and Sirius, on average, have added 3 million new subscribers every year.


"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki