backtop

Print E-mail del.icio.us 29 comment(s) - last by CvP.. on Jan 30 at 3:36 AM

Radeon 3870 X2 Edition @ AnandTech
DailyTech's roundup of hardware reviews from around the web for Monday

Radeon HD 3870 X2 Reviews
AnandTech
TechReport
PCPerspective
HardwareCunucks
HotHardware
OCC
BootDaily
TweakTown
OCCafe
DriverHeaven
LegitReviews
ChileHardware (Spanish)

Motherboard
MSI P35 Platinum @ BootDaily
GIGABYTE X38T-DQ6 @ TweakTown
ASUS P5E3 Deluxe WiFi X38 Motherboard Review @ HardwareLogic.com
               
Video
ECS N8800GT-512MX DT @ t-break
GeForce 8800 GT Roundup @ InsideHW.com
Sparkle 8800GTS 512MB @ Madshrimps
               
Memory
OCZ 4GB Reaper X HPC PC2-6400 Memory Review @ Virtual-Hideout


Display
Samsung SyncMaster 2232GW 22-inch @ ThinkComputers

Cases
Sunbeamtech Rheobus Extreme @ Pro-Clockers
Nexus Caterpillar  @ TechwareLabs
               
Cooling
Cooler Master Cosmos @ FPSLabs

Photography
Fujifilm FinePix A920 @ TrustedReviews

CE
SanDisk Sansa Clip MP3 Player @ TechwareLabs
Samsung SGH-D880 @ TechARP
Logitech Squeezebox @ LaptopLogic
Palm Treo 750 @ Techgage

Networking
Netgear WFS709TP @ TrustedReviews

Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Yawn...
By Chiggs on 1/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: Yawn...
By deeznuts on 1/28/2008 6:51:57 PM , Rating: 2
RE: Yawn...
By dr4gon on 1/28/2008 6:53:02 PM , Rating: 2
They'll fight the same way they've been fighting, a lower price.

$450 seems pretty fair to me especially when the 3870 is retailing at ~$230+ per card. This is two together and has the possibility of running crossfire X with 4 rv670s together.

The new 9800GX2 will certainly be better in drivers (as most newer games are sponsored by nvidia with the exception of half life title) and will be much faster but have a hefty price tag (replacing and probably more expensive than the 8800 Ultra)


RE: Yawn...
By Chiggs on 1/28/2008 6:59:35 PM , Rating: 2
You raise some fair points. I almost bought a 3870 because I couldn't find an 8800GT for weeks.

I am excited about the future of multi-GPU cards, I just wish this one performed a little better, and it's price was $399.99. That would be tough to beat. As it stands now, the cards are $449.99 and they'll probably be more in the next couple of days.

Still, AMD is staying competitive in this field, which is a sight better than what's going on in processor land.


RE: Yawn...
By StevoLincolnite on 1/28/2008 7:11:34 PM , Rating: 2
Thats very true, but ATI's Crossfire is more efficient than SLI at the moment. - And isn't the R700 supposedly coming out soon?


RE: Yawn...
By DingieM on 1/29/2008 3:34:45 AM , Rating: 2
Be prepared to pay a hefty price for the nVidia solution. nVidia has problems with thermal characteristics. I've heard it many times now.
That will cost extra to shield the card against overheating.

AMD/ATI has surpassed nVidia in the thermal characteristics area and board layout (almost all digital now).
ATI's solution will stay much cooler, also because of its advanced powersaving.

And the current driver of the HD3870 X2 is not very good, it can do much faster, but we have to wait for that.


RE: Yawn...
By Sahrin on 1/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: Yawn...
By Chiggs on 1/28/2008 7:27:02 PM , Rating: 2
Except the cost of an automobile alone pretty much makes the other 50% that you do lose a bit more noticeable than say, some low ticket item you discard fairly quickly.

How much value does a new car lose the minute you drive it off the lot?


RE: Yawn...
By mmntech on 1/28/2008 7:47:06 PM , Rating: 2
I think it's 30% per annum in the first year and 20% for every year after if I remember my high school level accounting correctly.

$450 is pretty fair for that card though since two stand alone 3870s in Crossfire would cost about $460-$500.


RE: Yawn...
By xsilver on 1/28/2008 8:39:28 PM , Rating: 2
your $50 USD card will still be worth $10 in 3 years time. I still see radeon 9250's that sell on ebay, I have no idea why anybody would want one but hey.

Your $450 card depreciates about the same amount actually (to $50 or so) but the problem being that the total dollar amount is a whole lot more.


RE: Yawn...
By Hieyeck on 1/29/2008 9:31:23 AM , Rating: 2
of course, the R9200 series was a beast of a budget card...

not EVERYTHING depreciates: jewellery and real estate for example. of course, they still take the initial hit, but at most, you'd only lose the cost of processing (the craftsmanship or commission). After a few years however, it's almost garaunteed to appreciate in value, barring unfortunate events. (losing the ring, having the property fall off into the ocean or something)


RE: Yawn...
By masher2 (blog) on 1/28/2008 11:19:34 PM , Rating: 5
> "Think about how quickly your average "sponge" loses value. Or a gallon of gasoline?"

Err, if you bought a gallon of gas for $1.50 five years ago, you could sell it for $3.00 today. That's appreciation, not depreciation.


RE: Yawn...
By Sahrin on 1/29/2008 6:20:41 PM , Rating: 2
If you bought a gallon of gasoline and came back to it three years later to sell it, it would either have evaporated or turned into hydrocarbon soup - you're welcome to try and get 3/gal of oil scum.

If, however, you burned the gasoline - you would now have several pounds of CO2 and SO2 and HSO2...not worth very much, either.

The car loses value because you "use it up." Likewise, the gasoline loses value as you use it up (1 gallon becaome a half gallong becomes a quarter gallon). I didn't realize this analogy would be so unclear. My apologies.


RE: Yawn...
By wordsworm on 1/28/2008 11:04:41 PM , Rating: 2
I don't consider $449 too expensive for the industry's finest. I just newegged a GTX for $470. I'd like to see graphs for video card prices over the next and last 4 weeks. I've seen v90 640 MB cards for less than $300. These are still competitive and I can't help but wonder where they're going to fall. Can someone say $150 at the end of the year? That's great, I'd love to go SLI on my 320 for $140 by the end of the year.

I think this is really just the beginning for AMD. Merging two alpha dogs together is obviously going to create some short term problems. But the long term gains have strong potential. Of course, failure is always a possibility, but I think this recent success of AMD's is a sign of things to come.

The fact that AMD has expertise in servers with multiple CPU has got to be useful to creating a video card with multiple GPU.

The biggest question is: will the techworld be turned over on its ear when fusion finally makes its debut?


RE: Yawn...
By jbzx86 on 1/29/2008 9:19:48 AM , Rating: 1
Yeah, and the performance isn't as good as most of these "review" sites claim either. Remember, many of them (if not all) use canned time demos to "benchmark". I didn't see HardOCP.com up there in the list of review sites... why is that? They do actual in-game benchmarks, playing the game just like you and I would. They show a TOTALLY different story here. In fact, they compared it directly to the 8800 GTX of old and the GTX wins in all games BUT HL2 EP2.


[H]ardOCP
By CvP on 1/29/2008 11:24:38 AM , Rating: 2
their review of 3870 X2 was intentionally left out?!




RE: [H]ardOCP
By Chiggs on 1/29/2008 11:29:11 AM , Rating: 2
I found that amusing, as well. It's arguably one of the better reviews.

Canned time demos are crapola.


RE: [H]ardOCP
By ghost101 on 1/29/2008 1:10:02 PM , Rating: 4
So youu've bought in to the canned timedemo remark which has been quickly removed.

You do realise that the way they test their games is by actually playing the game with no strict limits on mimicing previous tests. So you want one test to perform worse? Fire an extra rocket now anad again.

All sites tend to use different timedemos where one isnt provided within the game. So if nearly all sites show similar relative performance between the 8800gtx and 3870x2, how can hardocp not question their methodology? They are clearly subject to high variance. Just look at some of their graphs. The differences in fps swings 20fps one way and then 20fps the other. How can that possibly be accurate.

Yes, timedemos will give different fps measurements, but the relative performance should remain the same. Unless you can explain that, hardocp's review should be rejected.


RE: [H]ardOCP
By ghost101 on 1/29/2008 1:27:36 PM , Rating: 2
Should clarify when i say differences in fps, i mean the relative performance between both cards and not the normal swings within a game.


RE: [H]ardOCP
By Chiggs on 1/29/2008 2:11:58 PM , Rating: 2
I think you're intentionally highlighting only the negative aspects of how they test, and completely avoiding the positives. As far as perfectly recreating each playthrough, of course they can't do that. But they can certainly play through a level with each card and give a damn good rundown of which card does better (minimums, maximums, etc). In fact, I'd argue that their testing method takes a lot longer than what the other guys do, which is why most of them probably don't do it this way.

And if you're insinuating that Kyle and crew are biased and paid off by Nvidia, then please provide some proof of this. If that's truly the case, then I can definitely see your concern with their testing methods.

But from my own experience, I've found HardOCP to be a pretty reliable hardware site...much more so than that joke called Tom's Hardware.